Skip to main content
Log in

Reflecting on stakeholders’ perceptions in an Ecological Risk Assessment workshop: Lessons for practitioners

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new form of Ecological Risk Assessment aims to improve environmental decision-making through strong stakeholder engagement, often in workshop situations. This wider focus increases interaction between workshop practitioners and stakeholders for reflecting on, and learning from, each others perceptions. In this article, we analyse and discuss a one day workshop that was concerned with trialling this method of deriving an Ecological Risk Assessment. We found that stakeholders had issues with some elements of the workshop process. The decision problem was formulated prior to the workshop and without consultation among all the stakeholders. Consequently, the original decision problem was rejected for a mutually derived broader focus and this resulted in a loss of clarity and purpose. Stakeholders did not wholly concur with the prioritising of ecological values over social and economic values and some stakeholders objected to defining assessment endpoints, because it implies a reductionist approach that doesn’t capture significance and understanding of systems. Ecological Risk Assessment workshops are complex and require significant practitioner and stakeholder development to provide useful and mutually derived outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.): 2003, Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 393 pp.

  • Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A.: 1982, Risk and Culture, University of California Press, California, 221 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P.: 1993, ‘Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach,’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., McDaniels, T., and Fields, D.: 2001, ‘Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights Through Structured Environmental Decisions,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20(3), 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., Burgman, M., Webb, A., Allison, G., Chapman, M., Duivenvoorden, L., Feehan, P., Grace, M., Lund, M., Pollino, C., Carey, J., and McCrea, A.: 2005, ‘Ecological Risk Management Framework for the Irrigation Industry,’ Report to National Program for Sustainable Irrigation, Water Studies Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

  • Patton, M.Q.: 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn., Sage Publications, California, 598 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, C. and Burrows, D.: 2005, ‘Improved Dissolved Oxygen Status Following Removal of Exotic Weed Mats in Important Fish Habitat Lagoons of the Tropical Burdekin River Floodplain, Australia,’ Marine Pollution Bulletin 51, 138–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, G.W.: 1993, Ecological Risk Assessment, Lewis Publishers, Michigan, 538 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. M. Kellett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kellett, B.M., Beilin, R.I., Bristow, K.L. et al. Reflecting on stakeholders’ perceptions in an Ecological Risk Assessment workshop: Lessons for practitioners. Environmentalist 27, 109–117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9017-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9017-8

Keywords

Navigation