Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is recycled water use risky? An Urban Australian community’s perspective

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of a global water crisis has seen the necessity for a sustainable approach to water management. Policies directed towards water recycling have been implemented in many regions of the world. In Australia, prolonged drought conditions in most major cities during the past decade have led to serious national calls for less drinking water to be used (Prime Minister’s Science Engineering and Innovation Council, 2003), and a strategic policy response from many State Governments, including bold targets for water recycling. A key consideration to the realisation of these policies is greater understanding of community attitudes to recycled water use, without which, a number of recycled water projects have failed (Hurlimann and McKay, 2004). Despite the critical nature of community attitudes, little research has been conducted, especially in relation to perception of risk, which has been found to be critical in the adoption of new technologies (Cvetkovich and Lofstedt, 1999). This paper investigates an urban Australian community’s perception of risk involved with using recycled water. Key findings include: perception of risk increased as the use of recycled water became increasingly personal. Perception of risk was significantly negatively related to trust, perception of fairness and information. Trust in the Water Authority to manage risk was significantly related to perception of trust, communication and integrity of the Authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.C. and Narus, J.A.: 1990, ‘A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships,’ Journal of Marketing 54, 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attwater, R. and Derry, C.: 2005, ‘Engaging Communities of Practice for Risk Communication in the Hawkesbury Water Recycling Scheme,’ Action Research 3(2), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics: 2004, 4610.0: Water Account Australia, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 5 July 2004, <http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/a7f8ae8188119911ca2568d40004 eaf7?OpenDocument>.

  • Babbie, E.: 1989, The Practice of Social Research, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baggett, S., Jeffrey, P., and Jefferson, B.: 2006, ‘Risk Perception in Participatory Planning for Water Reuse,’ Desalination 187, 149–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G.M.: 2000, ‘Risk Communication: Factors Affecting Impact,’ British Medical Bulletin 56:1, 110–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruvold, W.H.: 1988, ‘Public Opinion on Water Reuse Options,’ Water Pollution Control Federation 60(1), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments: 2004, Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative, Canberra, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 21 September 2004, <http://www.coag.gov.au/meetings/250604/iga_national_water_initiative.pdf>.

  • Cvetkovich, G. and Lofstedt, R.E.: 1999, Social Trust and the Management of Risk, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daughton, C.G.: 2004, ‘Ground Water Recharge and Chemical Contaminants: Challenges in Communicating the Connections and Collisions of Two Disparate Worlds,’ Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 24(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Human Services, Environment Protection Agency, and Government of South Australia: 1999, South Australian Reclaimed Water Guidelines, Environment Protection Agency, Adelaide.

  • Dillon, P.: 2000, ‘Water Reuse in Australia: Current Status, Projections and Research,’ paper presented at the Water Recycling Australia Conference, Adelaide, October 19–20.

  • Flynn, J., Burns, W., Mertz, C.K., and Slovic, P.: 1992, ‘Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High-level Radioactive Waste Depository: Analysis of a Structural Model,’ Risk Analysis 12(3), 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., and Shepherd, R.: 1996, ‘What Determines Trust in Information about Food Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs,’ Risk Analysis 16(4), 473–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Western Australia: 2003, A State Water Strategy, for Western Australia, Government of Western Australia, Perth, viewed 21 September 2004, <http://www.ourwaterfuture.com.au/ Docs/State_Water_Strategy_complete.pdf>.

  • Hurlimann, A. and McKay, J.: 2004, ‘Attitudes to Reclaimed Water for Domestic Use: Part 2. Trust,’ Water, Journal of the Australian Water Association 31(5), 40–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, T.F.: 1966, ‘Consumer Buying Intentions and Purchase Probability: An Experiment in Survey Design,’ American Statistical Association Journal September, 658–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. and Zadoroznyj, M.: 2005, ‘Managing Sustainable Urban Water Reuse: Structural Context and Cultures of Trust,’ Society and Natural Resources 18, 557–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J. and Hurlimann, A.C.: 2003, ‘Attitudes to Reclaimed Water for Domestic Use: Part 1 Age,’ Water, Journal of the Australian Water Association 30(5), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Po, M., Kaercher, J.D., and Nancarrow, B.E.: 2003, Literature Review of Factors Influencing Public Perceptions of Water Reuse, CSIRO Land and Water, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Science Engineering and Innovation Council: 2003, Recycling Water For Our Cities, Federal Government of Australia, Canberra.

  • Selnes, F.: 1998, ‘Antecedents and Consequences of Trust and Satisfaction in Buyer-seller Relationships,’ European Journal of Marketing 32(3/4), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Government of Victoria: 2002, New Water for Victoria, Victoria’s Water Recycling Action Plan, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne, viewed 21 September2002, <http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/dse/nrenlwm.nsf/93a98744f6ec41bd4a256c8e00013aa9/fd52871f222b5a 214a256dea0024ed8c/$ FILE/ATTMOAOP/Water%20Recycling%20Action%20Plan.pdf>.

  • Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc.: 1997, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS, Chicago, IL.

  • Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc.: 1997, SPSS Conjoint 8.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL.

  • Stenekes, N., Schaefer, A.I., and Ashbolt, N.: 2001, ‘Community Involvement in Water Recycling—Issues and Needs,’ paper presented at the Recent Advances in Water Recycling Technologies Workshop, Brisbane, 26 November.

  • Sydney Water: 1999, Community Views on Re-Cycled Water, Sydney Water, Sydney.

  • Toze, S.: 2005, ‘Water Reuse and Health Risks—Real vs Perceived,’ in S. Khan, M.H. Muston, and A.I. Schaefer (eds.), Proceedings from Integrated Concepts in Water Recycling, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, pp. 680–690.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Anna C. Hurlimann (Lecturer)

Authors
  1. Anna C. Hurlimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna C. Hurlimann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurlimann, A.C. Is recycled water use risky? An Urban Australian community’s perspective. Environmentalist 27, 83–94 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9019-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9019-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation