Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The provision and utility of science and uncertainty to decision-makers: earth science case studies

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates how scientific information and expertise was provided to decision-makers for consideration in situations involving risk and uncertainty. Seven case studies from the earth sciences were used as a medium for this exposition: (1) the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand, (2) agricultural farming-system development in North West Queensland, (3) operational flood models, (4) natural disaster risk assessment for Tasmania, (5) deep sea mining in New Zealand, (6) 3-D modelling of geological resource deposits, and (7) land-based pollutant loads to Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. Case studies are lead-authored by a diverse range of scientists, based either in universities, industry, or government science agencies, with diverse roles, experiences, and perspectives on the events discussed. The context and mechanisms by which scientific information was obtained, presented to decision-makers, and utilised in decision-making is presented. Sources of scientific uncertainties and how they were communicated to and considered in decision-making processes are discussed. Decisions enacted in each case study are considered in terms of whether they were scientifically informed, aligned with prevailing scientific evidence, considered scientific uncertainty, were informed by models, and were (or were not) precautionary in nature. The roles of other relevant inputs (e.g. political, socioeconomic considerations) in decision-making are also described. Here we demonstrate that scientific evidence may enter decision-making processes through diverse pathways, ranging from direct solicitations by decision-makers to independent requests from stakeholders following media coverage of relevant research. If immediately relevant scientific data cannot be provided with sufficient expediency to meet the demands of decision-makers, decision-makers may (i) seek expert scientific advice and judgement (to assist with decision-making under conditions of high epistemic uncertainty), (ii) delay decision-making (until sufficient evidence is obtained), and/or (iii) provide opportunities for adjustment of decisions as additional information becomes available. If the likelihood of occurrence of potentially adverse future risks is perceived by decision-makers to exceed acceptable thresholds and/or be highly uncertain, precautionary decisions with adaptive capacity may be favoured, even if some scientific evidence suggests lower levels of risk. The efficacy with which relevant scientific data, models, and uncertainties contribute to decision-making may relate to factors including the expediency with which this information can be obtained, the perceived strength and relevance of the information presented, the extent to which relevant experts have participated and collaborated in scientific communications to decision-makers and stakeholders, and the perceived risks to decision-makers of favouring earth science information above other, potentially conflicting, scientific and non-scientific inputs. This paper provides detailed Australian and New Zealand case studies showcasing how science actions and provision pathways contribute to decision-making processes. We outline key learnings from these case studies and encourage more empirical evidence through documented examples to help guide decision-making practices in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.geonet.org; www.drquigs.com.

  2. http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/5248119/Free-public-quake-lectures; http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/canterbury-earthquake-2010/4255970/Thirst-for-quake-info-at-lecture.

  3. https://royalsociety.org.nz/assets/documents/Information-paperThe-Canterbury-Earthquakes.pdf.

  4. http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2011/0012/latest/DLM3653522.html.

  5. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/quake-outcasts-and-fowler-v-minister-for-canterbury-earthquake-recovery/@@images/fileDecision.

  6. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/83446819/High-Court-denies-uninsured-Quake-Outcasts-appeal.

  7. https://www.naturalhazards.org.nz/content/download/9099/49062/file/Hazards_Platform_Partnership_Agreement.pdf.

  8. https://ceraarchive.dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/Documents/memorandum-for-cabinet-land-damage-june-2011_0.pdf.

  9. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/quake-outcasts-and-fowler-v-minister-for-canterbury-earthquake-recovery/@@images/fileDecision.

  10. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/quake-outcasts-and-fowler-v-minister-for-canterbury-earthquake-recovery/@@images/fileDecision.

  11. http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/7656654/Brownlee-fed-up-with-moaning-residents.

  12. http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/8220906/I-told-you-so-says-Brownlee-on-rockfall.

  13. http://proposeddistrictplan1.ccc.govt.nz/.

  14. http://proposeddistrictplan1.ccc.govt.nz/.

  15. http://www.chchplan.ihp.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/310_495-CCC-and-Crown-Joint-Memorandum-re-Preparations-for-Hearing-of-Natural-Hazards-8-12-14.pdf.

  16. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/10574099/Alpine-Fault-unlikely-to-trigger-Port-Hills-rockfall.

  17. http://www.chchplan.ihp.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/IHP_Natural-Hazards-PART_180315.pdf.

  18. http://www.chchplan.ihp.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Technical-expert-witness-caucusing-report-Natural-Hazards-full-signed.pdf).

  19. http://www.chchplan.ihp.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Technical-expert-witness-caucusing-report-Natural-Hazards-full-signed.pdf.

  20. http://www.chchplan.ihp.govt.nz/hearings/.

  21. http://www.eqrecoverylearning.org/assets/downloads/2016-02-01-rec3020-cera-residential-red-zone-survey-report.pdf.

  22. http://www.eqrecoverylearning.org/assets/downloads/2016-02-01-rec3020-cera-residential-red-zone-survey-report.pdf.

  23. https://www.hrc.co.nz/red-zones-report/.

  24. http://www.eqrecoverylearning.org/assets/downloads/2016-02-01-rec3020-cera-residential-red-zone-survey-report.pdf.

  25. https://www.hrc.co.nz/red-zones-report/.

  26. https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/scientists-side-campbell-moon-man-quake-prediction-dispute-ck-87208.

  27. https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?pid=csiro:EP1313098.

  28. https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/our-north-our-future-white-paper-on-developing-northern-australia.

  29. www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/.

  30. www.armonline.com.au.

  31. www.armonline.com.au.

  32. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/global_report_drowning/en/.

  33. http://www.watersafety.com.au/Portals/0/AWSC%20Strategy%202016-20/RLS_AWSS2016_Report_2016LR.pdf.

  34. http://www.floodcommission.qld.gov.au/publications/final-report.

  35. http://book.arr.org.au.s3-website-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/.

  36. https://anuga.anu.edu.au/.

  37. http://www.floodcommission.qld.gov.au/publications/final-report/.

  38. http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019%2F152362%2Fcif-seq-floods-20120605.pdf.

  39. http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/bureau-of-meteorology-under-fire-after-a-weekend-of-wild-weather-and-storms-in-queensland-left-many-unprepared/news-story/d9cc7f437770f3dc22fe95a45516e0d9.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-22/locals-query-why-no-warning-was-given-for-heavy-rain/8377698.

  40. http://book.arr.org.au.s3-website-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/.

  41. http://www.watersafety.com.au/Portals/0/AWSC%20Strategy%202016-20/RLS_AWSS2016_Report_2016LR.pdf.

  42. http://www.ses.tas.gov.au/h/em/risk-mgmt/tsndra.

  43. https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/resources/handbook-10-national-emergency-risk-assessment-guidelines/.

  44. https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/eez-applications/view/EEZ000004.

  45. https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/FileAPI/proposal/EEZ000004/Boards-Decision/EEZ000004-Trans-Tasman-Resources-decision-17June2014.pdf.

  46. https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/FileAPI/proposal/EEZ000004/Boards-Decision/EEZ000004-Trans-Tasman-Resources-decision-17June2014.pdf.

  47. https://www.ttrl.co.nz/fileadmin/user_upload/TTR_Media_Statement_Marine_Consent_Application_23Aug16_-_updated.pdf.

  48. https://www.epa.govt.nz/public-consultations/decided/trans-tasman-resources-limited-2016/.

  49. https://www.ttrl.co.nz/fileadmin/user_upload/TTR_Media_Statement_DMC_Decision_10Aug17.pdf.

  50. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/the-taranaki-whanganui-conservation-board-v-the-environmental-protection-authority/@@images/fileDecision?r=222.009077804.

  51. https://www.ttrl.co.nz/fileadmin/user_upload/TTR_Seeks_Leave_to_Appeal_21_September_2018.pdf.

  52. https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/eez-applications/view/EEZ000006.

  53. See applicant proposal documents at https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/eez-applications/view/EEZ000006.

  54. See Applicant proposal documents at https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/eez-applications/view/EEZ000006.

  55. See Boards decision at https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/eez-applications/view/EEZ000006.

References

  • Apel H, Thieken A, Merz B (2006) A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8603-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armour JD, Hateley LR, Pitt GL (2009) Catchment modelling of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient loads with SedNet/ANNEX in the Tully-Murray basin. Mar Freshw Res 60:1091–1096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascough J II, Maierb H, Ravalico J, Strudley M (2008) Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecol Model 219:383–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Geomechanics Society (2007) Practice note guidelines for landslide risk management. J News Aust Geomech Soc 42:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock B (1992) The effects of uncertainty on optimal nitrogen applications. Appl Econ Perpect Policy 14:271–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/1349506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow K, Thayalakumaran T, Moody P (2016) Extending “SafeGauge for Nutrients” to high rainfall cropping in Australia. In: 7th International Nitrogen Imitative Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2016

  • Barnes L, Gruntfest E, Hayden M, Schultz D, Benight C (2007) False alarms and close calls: a conceptual model of warning accuracy. Weather Forecast 22:1140–1147. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF1031.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley R, Speirs WJ, Ellis TW, Waters DK (2012) A review of sediment and nutrient concentration data from Australia for use in catchment water quality models. Marine Pollut Bull 65:101–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beaven S, Wilson T, Johnston L, Johnston D, Smith R (2016) Role of boundary organization after a disaster: New Zealand’s natural hazards research platform and the 2010–2011 canterbury earthquake sequence. Nat Hazards Rev 18:05016003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Potter S, Wein A, Doyle E, Ratliff J (2015) Aftershock communication during the Canterbury earthquakes, New Zealand: implications for response and recovery in the built environment. In: New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, 2015

  • Behnam A, Visbeck M (2013) The future of fish–The fisheries of the future. Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnam A, Visbeck M (2014) Marine resources—Opportunities and risks. Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernecker T, Woollands M, Wong D, Moore D, Smith M (2001) Hydrocarbon prospectivity of the deep water Gippsland Basin, Victoria, Australia. APPEA J 41:91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berryman K (2012) Geoscience as a component of response and recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence of 2010–2011. N Z J Geol Geophys 55:313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollmann Moritz et al (2010) Living with the oceans. Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Borella J, Quigley M, Sohbati R, Almond P, Gravley DM, Murray A (2016a) Chronology and processes of late Quaternary hillslope sedimentation in the eastern South Island. N Z J Quat Sci 31:691–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borella J, Quigley M, Vick L (2016b) Anthropocene rockfalls travel farther than prehistoric predecessors. Sci Adv 2:e1600969. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boskalis Offshore (2014a) Appendix 3: compilation of literature on the Chatham Rise phosphorite deposit

  • Boskalis Offshore (2014b) Appendix 4: summary and analysis of site investigation data

  • Bosomworth B, Cowie B (2016) Response to the independent reviews of DNRM activities under Action 8 & 9 of Reef Plan 2013. Land and Water Science, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, State of Queensland

  • Breznitz S (1984) Cry wolf: the psychology of false alarms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie J (2012) Great Barrier Reef dying beneath its crown of thorns. The Conversation

  • Bruns A, Burgess J (2012) Local and global responses to disaster: #eqnz and the Christchurch earthquake. In: disaster and emergency management conference, Brisbane Exhibition and Convention Centre, AST Management Pty Ltd, Brisbane, QLD, pp 86–103

  • Cheong L, Bleisch S, Kealy A, Tolhurst K, Wilkening T, Duckham M (2016) Evaluating the impact of visualization of wildfire hazard upon decision-making under uncertainty. Int J Geogg Inf Sci 30:1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiswell SM (2014) Appendix 8: Physical oceanographic data available on the Chatham Ris

  • Clark JS (2005) Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecol Lett 8(1):2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke H, Pappenberger F (2009) Ensemble flood forecasting: a review. J Hydrol 375:613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates L, Haynes K, O’Brien J, McAneney J, de Oliveira F (2014) Exploring 167 years of vulnerability: an examination of extreme heat events in Australia 1844–2010. Environ Sci Policy 42:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colyvan M et al. (2017) Addressing risk in conditions of uncertainty, ignorance, and partial knowledge. In: An interdisciplinary approach to living in a risky world. Recommendations from the Theo Murphy High Flyers Workshop, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, ACT, pp. 5–7

  • Comrie N (2011) Review of the 2010–11 flood warnings and response. Victorian Government, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox H, Hammer G, McLean G, King C National WhopperCropper – risk management discussion support software. In ‘New directions for a diverse planet. In: Fischer T, Turner N, Angus J, Mcintyre L, Robertson M, Borrell A, Lloyd D (eds) Proceedings for the 4th international crop science congress, Brisbane, Australia, 2004

  • CRP (2014) Appendix 7: other voyages overview

  • Cubrinovski M et al (2010) Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 43:243–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgliesh N, Cocks B, Horan H (2012) APSoil-providing soils information to consultants, farmers and researchers. In: capturing opportunities and overcoming obstacles in Australian Agronomy” Proceedings of the 16th ASA conference, Armidale, NSW Australia, 2012

  • Darnell R, Henderson BL, Kroon FJ, Kuhnert PM (2012) Statistical power of detecting trends in total suspended sediment loads to the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Pollut Bull 65:203–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De’Ath G, Fabricius KE, Sweatman H, Puotinen M (2012) The 27-year decline of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef and its causes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:17995–17999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow K, Cutter S (1998) Crying wolf: repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders. Coast Manage 26:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper D (1995) Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. J R Stat Soc 57:45–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Durden J et al (2016) Report on the managing impacts of deep-sea reSource exploitation (MIDAS) workshop on environmental management of deep-sea mining. Res Ideas Outcomes 2:e10292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Authority NZ (2017) Decision on marine consents and marine discharge consents application: EEZ000011, Trans-Tasman Resources Limited. Extracting and processing ireon sand within the South Taranaki Bight, Wellington

  • Environmental Protection Authority NZ (2012) Exclusive economic zone and continental shelf environmental effects act 2012. The New Zealand Federal Government, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Authority NZ (2015) Decision on marine consent application by Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited to mine phosphorite nodules on the Chatham Rise. Environmental Protection Authority, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson D, Horwood L, Boden J, Mulder R (2014) Impact of a major disaster on the mental health of a well-studied cohort. JAMA Psychiatry 71:1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, A. (1990) Confronting Uncertainty in Risk Management: A Guide for Decision Makers. Center for Risk Management, Resources for the Future

  • Fischer R (2009) Exploiting the synergy between genetic improvement and agronomy of crops in rainfed farming systems of Australia. In: Sadras V, Calderini D (eds) Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B, Davis AL (2014) Communicating scientific uncertainty. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(Supplement 4):13664–13671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberger M et al (2011) Probabilistic assessment of liquefaction potential for Christchurch in the next 50 years. vol 2011/15. GNS Science, Lower Hutt

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde KM et al. (2016) Report on the implications of MIDAS results for policy makers with recommendations for future regulations to be adopted by the EU and the ISA

  • Gladish DW et al (2016) Spatio-temporal assimilation of modelled catchment loads with monitoring data in the Great Barrier Reef. Ann Appl Stat 10:1590–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill K, Ristau J, Reyners M, Fry B, Holden C (2010) The Darfield (Canterbury) Mw 7.1 earthquake of September 2010: preliminary seismological report. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 43:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman P (2014) The art of science advice to government. Nature 507:163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golder Associates Ltd (2014a) Appendix 35(i): draft environmental management and monitoring plan

  • Golder Associates Ltd (2014b) Marine consent application and environmental impact assessment

  • Golder Associates Ltd (2014c) Marine Consent application and environmental impact assessment: non-technical summary

  • Grogan R (2017) Regulating extractive industries: what works in practice?, Practitioners’ perspectives on the effective implementation of environmental legislation

  • Halfar J, Fujita RM (2002) Precautionary management of deep-sea mining. Mar Policy 26:103–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00041-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannington M, Petersen S, Kratschell A (2017) Subsea mining moves closer to shore. Nat Geosci 10:158–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herron DA (2011) First steps in seismic interpretation. Geophysical monograph series number 16. Society of Exploration Geophysicists

  • Holzworth D et al (2014) APSIM—Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environ Modell Softw 62:327–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes T, Cinner J (2017) The world’s coral reefs. The Conversation

  • Hughes M, Quigley M, van Ballegooy S, Deam B, Bradley B, Hart D (2015) The sinking city: earthquakes increase flood hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand. GSA Today 25:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes T et al (2017) Coral reefs in the anthropocene. Nature 546:82–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Allan S, Peters K, O’Donnell R (2014) Appendix 2: genesis of the Chatham Rise deposit: a synthesis of current literature (Kenex 2010)

  • Jarihani B, Sidle RC, Bartley R, Roth CH, Wilkinson S (2017) Characterisation of hydrological response to rainfall at multi spatio-temporal scales in savannas of semi-arid Australia. Water 9:540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey S, Carter J, Moodie K, Beswick A (2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environ Modell Softw 16:309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins L, Brill R The effect of time of sowing on phenology and yield of chickpeas at Trangie Central West, NSW, 2011. In: capturing opportunities and overcoming obstacles in Australian Agronomy, Proceedings of the 16th ASA Conference, Armidale, Australia, 2012

  • Jones JWAJM, Basso B, Boote KJ, Conant RT, Foster I, Godfray HCJ, Herrero M, Howitt RE, Janssen S, Keating BA, Munoz RM, Porter CH, Rosenzweig C, Wheeler TR et al (2016) Brief history of agricultural systems modeling. Agric Syst 155:240–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon FJ et al (2012) River loads of suspended solids, nitrogen, phosphorus and herbicides delivered to the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Mar Pollut Bull 65:167–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon FJ, Thorburn P, Schaffelke B, Whitten S (2016) Towards protecting the Great Barrier Reef from land-based pollution. Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnert PM, Henderson BL, Lewis SE, Bainbridge ZT, Wilkinson SN, Brodie JE (2012) Quantifying total suspended sediment export from the Burdekin River catchment using the loads regression estimator tool. Water Resour Res 48:256. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnert PM, Pagendam DE, Bartley R, Gladish DW, Lewis SE, Bainbridge ZT (2017) Making management decisions in the face of uncertainty: a case study using the Burdekin catchment in the Great Barrier Reef Marine and Freshwater Research Submitted

  • Leonard M et al (2014) A compound event framework for understanding extreme impacts WIREs. Clim Change 5:113–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lescinski J (2014) Statement of evidence of Jamie Lescinski for Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited. EPANZ, Welllington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay M, Aillères L, Jessell M, de Kemp E, Betts P (2012) Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia. Tectonophysics 546–547:10–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Anklam E, Collier ZA, DiMase D, Renn O (2014) Risk-based standards: integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches. Environ Syst Decis 34:134–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey B, Quigley M (2014) Strong proximal earthquakes revealed by cosmogenic 3He dating of prehistoric rockfalls, Christchurch, New Zealand. Geology 42:975–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann J (1993) Computers in geology—25 years of progress. In: Davis J, Herzfeld UZ (eds) Uncertainty in geology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin H (1999) Adakitic magmas: modern analogues of Archaean granitoids. Lithos 46:411–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massey C et al (2014) Determining rockfall risk in Christchurch using rockfalls triggered by the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. Earthq Spectra 30:155–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell RW, Littlejohn RP, Blennerhassett JD (2010) Phosphorus fertilizer form affects phosphorus loss to waterways: a paired catchment study. Soil Use Manag 26:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00289.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean M, Blackburn G (2013) A new regional velocity model for the Gippsland Basin. Department of Primary Industries

  • Moody P, Agustina L, Robinson B, McHugh A, Dang Y (2013) Safegauge: a web-based decision support tool for informing nutrient management in the Queensland sugar industry vol???

  • Moore D, Wong D (2002) Eastern and Central Gippsland Basin, Southeast Australia; Basement Interpretation and Basin Links. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Australia

  • Morgan M, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty. A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 346

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R, Weinmann E, Hill P Use of Monte Carlo Simulation to Estimate the Expected Probability of Large to Extreme Floods. In: Boyd M, Ball J, Babister M, Green J (eds) 28th International Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium: About Water, Barton, ACT, Australia, 2003. Institution of Engineers, Australia

  • Neale T (2015) Scientific knowledge and scientific uncertainty in bushfire and flood risk mitigation. Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, East Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker M, Steenkamp D (2012) The economic impact of the Canterbury earthquakes. Reserve Bank N Z Bull 75:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechlivanidis I, Jackson B, McIntyre N, Wheater H (2011) Catchment scale hydrological modelling: a review of model types, calibration approaches and uncertainty analysis methods In the context of recent developments in technology and applications. Glob NEST J 13:193–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr (2003) The role of models in prediction for decision. In: Lauenroth WK (ed) Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 111–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr, Conant RT (2003) Best practices in prediction for decision-making: lessons from the atmospheric and earth sciences. Ecology 84(6):1351–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QAO (2015) Managing water quality in Great Barrier Reef catchments vol Report 20: 2015-2015. Queensland Audit Office, The State of Queensland

  • Queensland Government (2009) Great Barrier Reef first report card 2009 baseline. Reef water quality protection plan. Queensland Government, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government (2015) Great Barrier Reef report card 2014. Reef water quality protection plan. Queensland Government, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley M, Forte A (2017) Science website traffic in earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220160172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley M et al (2010) Surface rupture of the Greendale fault during the Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake, New Zealand: initial findings. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 43:236–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley M, Bastin S, Bradley B (2013) Recurrent liquefaction in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Geology 41:419–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley M et al (2016) The 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence: environmental effects, seismic triggering thresholds and geologic legacy. Tectonophysics 672–673:228–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, M et al. (in review at Minerva) The provision and utility of earth science to decision-makers

  • Rahmanian V, Moore P, Mudge W, Spring D (1990) Sequence stratigraphy and the habitat of hydrocarbons, Gippsland Basin, Australia, vol 50. Geological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Recommendations from the 2016 Theo Murphy High Flyers Think Tank. An interdisciplinary approach to living in a risky world. (2017). Canberra: Australian Academy of Science. https://www.science.org.au/files/userfiles/events/documents/think-tank-risk-recommendations-1.pdf

  • Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Secretariat (2009) Reef Water Quality Protection Plan 2009. For the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area and Adjacent Catchments. vol http://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/about/assets/reefplan-2009.pdf. Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Secretariat, Brisbane, Australia

  • Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Secretariat (2013) Reef Water Quality Protection Plan 2013. Securing the Health and Resilience of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area and Adjacent Catchments. vol http://www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/resources/assets/reef-plan-2013.pdf. Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Secretariat, Brisbane, Australia

  • Regan H, Colyvan M, Burgman M (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12:618–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, Nielsen O, Gray D, Sexton J, Davies G (2015) Anuga user manual release 2.0. Geoscience Australia, Symonston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D, Pielke R Jr (1999) Prediction in science and policy. Technol Soc 21(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saywell T (2016) Rubicon's F2 deposit is uneconomic: new geological model decimates gold resource. The Northern Miner January 18-January 24, Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, p 1

  • Spittlehouse J, Joyce P, Vierck E, Schluter P, Pearson J (2014) Ongoing adverse mental health impact of the earthquake sequence in Christchurch, New Zealand. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 48:756–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterk R (2014) Independent JORC (2012) Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate on the Chatham Rise Project in New Zealand

  • Stirling M et al (2012) National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1514–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone R, Hammer G, Marcussen T (1996) Prediction of global rainfall probabilities using phases of the Southern Oscillation Index. Nature 384:252–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swierczek E, Backe G, Holford S, Tenthorey E, Mitchell A (2015) 3D seismic analysis of complex faulting patterns above the Snapper Field, Gippsland Basin: implications for CO2 storage. Aust J Earth Sci 62:77–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Syers JK, Mackay AD, Brown MW, Currie LD (1986) Chemical and physical characteristics of phosphate rock materials of varying reactivity. J Sci Food Agric 37:1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740371102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S, McLennan S (1995) The geochemical evolution of the continental crust. Rev Geophys 33:241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayalakumaran T, Barlow K, Moody P ()2015 Extending “SafeGauge for Nutrients” to rainfed dairy systems in Victoria, Australia. In: 21st international congress on modelling and simulation, Gold Coast, Australia, 2015

  • Thiele S, Jessell M, Lindsay M, Wellmann J, Pakyuz-Charrier E (2016) The topology of geology 2: topological uncertainty. J Struct Geol 91:74–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremlett J (2015) Project 2058, One Ocean: Principles for the stewardship of a healthy and productive ocean. The McGuinness Institute, as part of Project 2058, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Van den Honert R, McAneney J (2011) The 2011 Brisbane floods: causes, impacts and implications. Water 3:1149–1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/w3041149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dissen R, Hornblow S, Villamor P, Quigley M, Litchfield N, Nicol A, Barrell D Greendale Fault rupture of 2010 (Darfield Earthquake, New Zealand): an example of recurrence interval and ground surface displacement characterisation for land-use planning and engineering design purposes. In: 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2015

  • Villamor P et al (2012) Map of the 2010 Greendale Fault surface rupture, Canterbury, New Zealand: application to land use planning. N Z J Geol Geophys 55:223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl T, Jain S, Bender J, Meyers S, Luther M (2015) Increasing risk of compound flooding from storm surge and rainfall for major US cities. Nature Clim Change 5:1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedding LM et al (2015) Managing mining of the deep seabed. Science 349:144–145. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wein A, Potter S, Johal S, Doyle E, Becker J (2016) Communicating with the public during an earthquake sequence: improving communication of geoscience by coordinating roles. Seismol Res Lett 87:112–118. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellmann J, Horowitz F, Schill E, Regenauer-Lieb K (2010) Towards incorporating uncertainty of structural data in 3D geological inversion. Tectonophysics 490:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger C, Hussey K, Pittock J (2013) Living with floods: key lessons from Australia and abroad. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, QLD, Australia

  • White C et al (2010) Climate futures for Tasmania: extreme events technical report. Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart

    Google Scholar 

  • White C et al (2013) On regional dynamical downscaling for the assessment and projection of temperature and precipitation extremes across Tasmania, Australia. Clim Dyn 41:3145–3165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1718-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White C, Remenyi T, McEvoy D, Trundle A, Corney S (2016a) 2016 Tasmanian State Natural Disaster Risk Assessment. University of Tasmania

  • White C, Remenyi T, McEvoy D, Trundle A, Corney S (2016b) 2016 Tasmanian State Natural Disaster Risk Assessment: All Hazard Summary. University of Tasmania

  • Wilkinson SN, Dougall C, Kinsey-Henderson A, Searle RD, Ellis RJ, Bartley R (2014) Development of a time-stepping sediment budget model for assessing land use impacts in large river basins. Sci Total Environ 468–469:1210–1224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RA (2014) Statement of evidence of Raymond Allen Wood for Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited

  • Wood RA, Falconer R (2016) Chatham Phosphate—a strategic resource. In: Christie AB (ed) Mineral Deposits of New Zealand Exploration and Research vol 31. vol AusIMM Monograph 31, vol 31. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp 517–522

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The modelling conducted in case study 2 and analysis activities reported, and the development of the armonline.com.au tools were made possible through funding provided by the Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries under the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries—University of Southern Queensland Broad Acre Grains Partnership. Dr Lance Pedergast (Senior Development Agronomist with the Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) assisted in the design, analysis and communication of chickpea analysis presented in this case study. Mr Howard Cox (Senior Agronomist Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) has contributed to the design and development of the ARM online tools. The author of case study 5 (PD) would like to thank Ray Wood and Renee Grogan for discussing many aspects of the CRP application and EPANZ hearing and decision. Their comments and suggestion greatly improved the original document. Hamish Campbell is also acknowledged for providing a thorough review of the draft. The authors thank the Australian Academy of Science (https://www.science.org.au/) for providing the opportunity to participate in the 2016 Theo Murphy High Flyers Think Tank (https://www.science.org.au/news-and-events/news-and-media-releases/2016-theo-murphy-think-tank-living-risky-world). From this intellectually challenging and stimulating event, this multi-disciplinary authorship team emerged, with broadened perspectives that benefitted the authors’ collaborative effort to tackle the challenging topics that are presented herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark C. Quigley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quigley, M.C., Bennetts, L.G., Durance, P. et al. The provision and utility of science and uncertainty to decision-makers: earth science case studies. Environ Syst Decis 39, 307–348 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09728-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09728-0

Keywords

Navigation