Skip to main content
Log in

Yield and miraculin content of nine miracle fruit (Synsepalum Dulcificum) morphotypes

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Miracle fruit (Synsepalum dulcificum) is an understudied tropical fruit species with potential as a source of natural, non-caloric sweetener. Miracle fruit berries have been consumed in Africa for over 100 years. The fruit pulp contains a protein called miraculin, a natural, non-caloric sweetener, that changes the perception of sour foods and beverages to sweet. Demand for natural, non-caloric sweeteners like miraculin is increasing due to the growing number of people affected by chronic diseases associated with high sugar consumption. Miracle fruit could play a role in reducing sugar content in some food and beverage applications, but basic plant yield data and miraculin content in the fruit is generally lacking. To overcome these limitations, fruit yield and miraculin content were analyzed for individual plants from a commercial miracle fruit farm growing nine plant morphotypes. Miracle fruit plants in general followed synchronized flowering periods with six harvest peaks within a single year with the largest yields from May to July. Total average yield ranged from 0.06 to 3.44 kg/tree/year for individual plants. The highest yielding plant morphotype was ‘Imperial’ with 2.76 kg/tree/yr. Average fruit weight ranged from 1.22–1.54 g, and pulp thickness ranged from 0.21–0.31 cm. A simplified extraction and quantification method was used to quantify miraculin from fruits. Miraculin content ranged from 0.07 for a ‘Holly’ morphotype to 1.30 mg/g of juice for a ‘Flame’ morphotype as measured by HPLC using recombinant miraculin as a protein standard. Overall, this study identified variation in both yield and miraculin content across sixty-six mature miracle fruit plants. These results will be useful for selecting superior plant types and provide foundational information supporting a new industry growing the natural, non-caloric sweetener miraculin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HPLC:

High performance liquid chromatography

Ni NTA:

Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors recognize Erik and Kris Tietig of The Miracle Fruit Farm (Homestead, FL) for access to the mature miracle fruit collection, and Jason Ryder of Miraculex (Davis, CA) for providing the recombinant miraculin protein standard.

Funding

This study was funded by USAID Cooperative Agreement Award No. AID-OAA-A-15–00039 and by a research grant to AC by The Miracle Fruit Farm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan H. Chambers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AC received funding from The Miracle Fruit Farm to conduct the biochemical analysis of miracle fruit. The Miracle Fruit Farm was not involved in data collection, analysis, or reporting of results.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demesyeux, L., Brym, M., Valdes, D. et al. Yield and miraculin content of nine miracle fruit (Synsepalum Dulcificum) morphotypes. Euphytica 216, 181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02710-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02710-x

Keywords

Navigation