Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening participation for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to family history: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Familial Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of observational studies to identify and summarise the level of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation for people at increased risk due to family history of the disease. Medline, Cinhal, Embase and PsychInfo databases were comprehensively searched between January 1995 and May 2012 to identify relevant articles. To be included, studies had to report on screening for people who had at least one first-degree relative with CRC and no previous personal diagnosis of the disease. Pooled screening participation levels were calculated for each screening modality. Seventeen studies, accounting for a total of 13,269 subjects with a family history of CRC met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies, including a total of 6,901 subjects had a pooled faecal occult blood testing screening participation (at least once) of 25 % (95 % CI 12–38). Five studies including a total of 5,091 subjects had a pooled sigmoidoscopy-based screening participation (at least once) of 16 % (95 % CI 7–27). Seven studies including a total of 9,965 subjects had pooled participation colonoscopy-based screening (at least once) of 40 % (95 % CI 26–54). There was a significant level of screening heterogeneity between studies. This review identified a substantial underuse of CRC screening for people at increased risk of developing the disease. It highlights the potential opportunity that exists for increasing screening participation among this segment of the population and the need to adjust the current CRC screening policies towards that objective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127(12):2893–2917. doi:10.1002/ijc.25516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baglietto L, Jenkins MA, Severi G et al (2006) Measures of familial aggregation depend on definition of family history: meta-analysis for colorectal cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 59(2):114–124. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johns LE, Houlston RS (2001) A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol 96(10):2992–3003. doi:10.1016/S0002-9270%2801%2903239-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor DP, Burt RW, Williams MS, Haug PJ, Cannon-Albright LA (2010) Population-based family history-specific risks for colorectal cancer: a constellation approach. Gastroenterology 138(3):877–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aaltonen L, Johns L, Jarvinen H, Mecklin JP, Houlston R (2007) Explaining the familial colorectal cancer risk associated with mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient and MMR-stable tumors. Clin Cancer Res 13(1):356–361. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hampel H, Frankel WL, Martin E et al (2008) Feasibility of screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(35):5783–5788. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jasperson KW, Tuohy TM, Neklason DW, Burt RW (2010) Hereditary and familial colon cancer. Gastroenterology 138(6):2044–2058. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Lin HH et al (2001) The colon cancer burden of genetically defined hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Gastroenterology 121(4):830–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carstensen B, Soll-Johanning H, Villadsen E, Sondergaard JO, Lynge E (1996) Familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in the general population. Int J Cancer 68(4):428–435. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19961115)68:4<428:AID-IJC5>3.0.CO;2-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Macklin MT (1960) Inheritance of cancer of the stomach and large intestine in man. J Natl Cancer Inst 24:551–571

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. St John DJ, McDermott FT, Hopper JL, Debney EA, Johnson WR, Hughes ES (1993) Cancer risk in relatives of patients with common colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 118(10):785–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH et al (1996) Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348(9040):1472–1477. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O (1996) Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348(9040):1467–1471. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR et al (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 328(19):1365–1371. doi:10.1056/NEJM199305133281901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradshaw N, Holloway S, Penman I, Dunlop MG, Porteous MEM (2003) Colonoscopy surveillance of individuals at risk of familial colorectal cancer. Gut 52(12):1748–1751. doi:10.1136/gut.52.12.1748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement (2008). Ann Intern Med 149(9):627–637

  17. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ et al (2010) Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut 59(5):666–689. doi:10.1136/gut.2009.179804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58(3):130–160. doi:10.3322/CA.2007.0018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rees G, Martin PR, Macrae FA (2008) Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: a review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 17(3):221–232. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00834.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mills EJ, Nachega JB, Buchan I et al (2006) Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa and North America: a meta-analysis. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 296(6):679–690. doi:10.1001/jama.296.6.679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stasi R, Sarpatwari A, Segal JB et al (2009) Effects of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review. Blood 113(6):1231–1240. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-167155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liljegren A, Lindgren G, Brandberg Y et al (2004) Individuals with an increased risk of colorectal cancer: perceived benefits and psychological aspects of surveillance by means of regular colonoscopies. J Clin Oncol 22(9):1736–1742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ait Ouakrim D, Boussioutas A, Lockett T et al (2012) Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5(2):240–247. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clavel-Chapelon F, Joseph R, Goulard H (1999) Surveillance behavior of women with a reported family history of colorectal cancer. Prev Med 28(2):174–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cockburn J, Paul C, Tzelepis F, McElduff P, Byles J (2002) Screening for bowel cancer among NSW adults with varying levels of risk: a community survey, 3 edn. The Cancer Council NSW Cancer Education Research Program, School of Medical Practice and Population Health, University of Newcastle, Wallsend, New South Wales. jillc@mail.newcastle.edu.au, pp 236–41

  27. Codori AM, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL, Boyd P (2001) Health beliefs and endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer: potential for cancer prevention. Prev Med 33(2 Pt 1):128–136. doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0862

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Courtney RJ, Paul CL, Sanson-Fisher RW et al (2012) Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: a community-level perspective. Med J Aust 196(8):516–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eisinger F, Giordanella JP, Didelot R et al (1996) Screening practices and familial antecedents of colorectal cancer. Survey with a voluntary population. [French]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 20(8–9):627–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fletcher RH, Lobb R, Bauer MR et al (2007) Screening patients with a family history of colorectal cancer. J Gen Intern Med 22(4):508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Griffith KA, McGuire DB, Royak-Schaler R, Plowden KO, Steinberger EK (2008) Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Cancer 113(2):276–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Harris MA, Byles JE (1997) A survey of screening compliance among first degree relatives of people with colon cancer in New South Wales. J Med Screen 4(1):29–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mack LA, Cook LS, Temple WJ, Carlson LE, Hilsden RJ, Paolucci EO (2009) Colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: benefits and barriers. Ann Surg Oncol 16(8):2092–2100. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0528-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, McLaughlin JR, Goel V (2003) Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med 25(3):187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S et al (2002) Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psychol 21(1):3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Murff HJ, Peterson NB, Fowke JH et al (2008) Colonoscopy screening in African Americans and Whites with affected first-degree relatives. Arch Intern Med 168(6):625–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Richardson JL, Danley K, Mondrus GT, Deapen D, Mack T (1995) Adherence to screening examinations for colorectal cancer after diagnosis in a first-degree relative. Prev Med 24(2):166–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shah M, Zhu K, Palmer RC, Jatoi I, Shriver C, Wu H (2007) Breast, colorectal, and skin cancer screening practices and family history of cancer in U.S. women. J Womens Health 16(4):526–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shah M, Zhu K, Palmer RC, Wu H (2007) Family history of cancer and utilization of prostate, colorectal and skin cancer screening tests in U.S. men. Prev Med 44(5):459–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thrasher JF, Cummings KM, Michalek AM, Mahoney MC, Moysich KB, Pillittere DM (2002) Colorectal cancer screening among individuals with and without a family history. J Publ Health Manag Pract JPHMP 8(2):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vernon SW, Briss PA, Tiro JA, Warnecke RB (2004) Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer 101(5 Suppl):1131–1145. doi:10.1002/cncr.20513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ritvo P, Myers R, Del Giudice ME et al (2009) Fecal occult blood testing: people in Ontario are unaware of it and not ready for it. Can Fam Physician 55(2):176–177.e4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN et al (2004) Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer 100(10):2093–2103. doi:10.1002/cncr.20276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shapiro JA, Seeff LC, Thompson TD, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW (2008) Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17(7):1623–1630. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor DP, Cannon-Albright LA, Sweeney C et al (2011) Comparison of compliance for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance by colonoscopy based on risk. Genet Med 13(8):737–743. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182180c71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Imperiale TF (2007) Toward risk stratification for screening and surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: one small step for the colonoscopist. Gastroenterology 133(4):1364–1367. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S et al (2003) Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: a test of a mediational model, 1 edn. Prev Med An Int J Devot Pract Theory. Elsevier Science, Netherlands

  48. Antoniou AC, Pharoah PP, Smith P, Easton DF (2004) The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 91(8):1580–1590. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fletcher SW (2011) Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective. Epidemiol Rev 33(1):165–175. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxr003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Freedman AN, Slattery ML, Ballard-Barbash R et al (2009) Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 27(5):686–693. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF (2003) Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 139(12):959–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Levitzky BE, Brown CC, Heeren TC, Schroy PC 3rd (2011) Performance of a risk index for advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia among a racially/ethnically diverse patient population (risk index for advanced proximal neoplasia). Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1099–1106. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Win AK, Macinnis RJ, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA (2012) Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(3):398–410. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lin OS (2011) Editorial: risk scoring for colon cancer screening: validated, but still not ready for prime time. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1107–1109. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hopper JL (2005) Application of genetics to the prevention of colorectal cancer. Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer 166:17–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP et al (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Madlensky L, McLaughlin J, Goel V (2003) A comparison of self-reported colorectal cancer screening with medical records. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 12(7):656–659

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Driss Ait Ouakrim was supported by a Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation PhD scholarship (CSIRO, Preventative Heath Flagship). The study was conducted independently of funding agencies. Mark Jenkins is supported by a National Health & Medical Research Council, Australia Senior Research Fellow grant. The study was conducted independently of funding agencies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Driss Ait Ouakrim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ait Ouakrim, D., Lockett, T., Boussioutas, A. et al. Screening participation for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to family history: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Familial Cancer 12, 459–472 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-013-9658-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-013-9658-3

Keywords

Navigation