Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beta-Anomaly: Evidence from the Indian Equity Market

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigates the existence of beta-anomaly in the Indian equity market. A growing body of literature shows that financial markets do not reward the risk (defined in terms of standard deviation or market beta). These results (known as ‘low-risk anomaly’ and ‘low-beta-anomaly’) are quite puzzling from the theoretical perspective. This study presents an empirical test of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in the Indian equity market to examine the existence of low risk/low beta anomaly. The study covers 650 actively traded stocks for a period of 189 months from July 2002 to March 2018, and the Fama–MacBeth procedure has been used for testing CAPM. The beta-shorted portfolios are formulated using both equal and value-weights. The results of the study were found robust after controlling for outliers and correcting the bias in standard errors, as suggested by Petersen (in Rev Financ Stud 22(1):435–480, 2009). We confirm the presence of ‘low-beta-anomaly’ in India. A non-linear relationship was found between CAPM beta and expected returns. This relationship follows a quadratic function, where expected returns initially increase with beta and then start declining, resulting in the negative risk premium for high-beta portfolios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S., & Zlate, A. (2014). Capital flows to emerging market economies: A brave new world? Journal of International Money and Finance, 48, 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asness, C., Frazzini, A., Gormsen, N. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2019). Betting against correlation: Testing theories of the low-risk effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(3), 629–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badshah, I. U. (2018). Volatility spillover from the fear index to developed and emerging markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Bradley, B., & Taliaferro, R. (2014). The low-risk anomaly: A decomposition into micro and macro effects. Financial Analysts Journal, 70(2), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Bradley, B., & Wurgler, J. (2011). Benchmarks as limits to arbitrage: Understanding the low-volatility anomaly. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(1), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N. L., & Haugen, R. A. (2012). Low-risk stocks outperform within all observable markets of the world. Available at SSRN 2055431.

  • Balasubramanian, N., Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. (2010). The relation between firm-level corporate governance and market value: A case study of India. Emerging Markets Review, 11(4), 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bali, T. G., Brown, S. J., Murray, S., & Tang, Y. (2017). A lottery-demand-based explanation of the beta anomaly. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(6), 2369–2397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C. B., Goldreyer, E., Lockwood, L., & Rodriguez, M. (2002). Robustness of size and value effects in emerging equity markets, 1985–2000. Emerging Markets Review, 3(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G. (1995). Market integration and investment barriers in emerging equity markets. The World Bank Economic Review, 9(1), 75–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (1997). Emerging equity market volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(1), 29–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2002). Research in emerging markets finance: Looking to the future. Emerging markets review, 3(4), 429–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2003). Emerging markets finance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(1–2), 3–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2017). Emerging equity markets in a globalizing world. Available at SSRN 2344817.

  • Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., & Lundblad, C. (2007). Liquidity and expected returns: Lessons from emerging markets. The review of financial studies, 20(6), 1783–1831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., Lundblad, C. T., & Siegel, S. (2011). What segments equity markets? The Review of Financial Studies, 24(12), 3841–3890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder, H. (2018). Do stocks outperform treasury bills? Journal of Financial Economics, 129(3), 440–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. The Journal of business, 45(3), 444–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., Jensen, M. C., & Scholes, M. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. Studies in the theory of capital markets, 81(3), 79–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, D., Falkenstein, E., & Van Vliet, P. (2014). Explanations for the volatility effect: An overview based on the CAPM assumptions. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 40(3), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, D., Pang, J., & Van Vliet, P. (2013). The volatility effect in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 16, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, D. C., & Van Vliet, P. (2007). The volatility effects. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 34(1), 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, M. E. (1970). Portfolio theory: A step toward its practical application. The Journal of Business, 43(2), 152–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, M. E., & Friend, I. (1973). A new look at the capital asset pricing model. The Journal of Finance, 28(1), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. J. (1971). Capital market equilibrium with divergent borrowing and lending rates. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 6(5), 1197–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Du, D. Y., Rhee, S. G., & Zhang, L. (2008). The returns to value and momentum in Asian markets. Emerging Markets Review, 9(2), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chui, A. C., & Wei, K. J. (1998). Book-to-market, firm size, and the turn-of-the-year effect: Evidence from Pacific-Basin emerging markets. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 6(3–4), 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giorgi, E. G., Post, T., & Yalçın, A. (2019). A concave security market line. Journal of Banking & Finance, 106, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D. K., & McConnell, J. J. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diether, K. B., Malloy, C. J., & Scherbina, A. (2002). Differences of opinion and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2113–2141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donadelli, M., & Persha, L. (2014). Understanding emerging market equity risk premia: Industries, governance and macroeconomic policy uncertainty. Research in International Business and Finance, 30, 284–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. D. (2009). A requiem for the retail investor? Virginia Law Review, 1105–1129.

  • Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International economic review, 10(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1998). Value versus growth: The international evidence. The journal of finance, 53(6), 1975–1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (2000). On the conditional relationship between beta and return in international stock returns. International Review of Financial Analysis, 9(3), 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, T., Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. J. (2011). Individual investors and volatility. The Journal of Finance, 66(4), 1369–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijns, B., Huynh, T. D., Tourani-Rad, A., & Westerholm, P. J. (2018). Institutional trading and asset pricing. Journal of Banking & Finance, 89, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghysels, E., Plazzi, A., & Valkanov, R. (2016). Why invest in emerging markets? The role of conditional return asymmetry. The Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2145–2192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandes, M., Panigo, D. T., & Pasquini, R. A. (2010). On the estimation of the cost of equity in Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 11(4), 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, B., & Kumar, A. (2013). Speculative retail trading and asset prices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(2), 377–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, X., Li, K., & Li, Y. (2019). Investor Overconfidence and the Security Market Line: New Evidence from China. Macquarie University Faculty of Business & Economics Research Paper.

  • Hanauer, M. X., & Lauterbach, J. G. (2019). The cross-section of emerging market stock returns. Emerging Markets Review, 38, 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. R. (1995). Predictable risk and returns in emerging markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 8(3), 773–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, R. A., & Heins, A. J. (1975). Risk and the rate of return on financial assets: Some old wine in new bottles. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10(5), 775–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., & Sraer, D. A. (2016). Speculative betas. The Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2095–2144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R., & Wang, Z. (1996). The conditional CAPM and the cross-section of expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90(2), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshipura, M., & Joshipura, N. (2016). The volatility effect: Evidence from India. Applied Finance Letters, 5(1), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshipura, N., & Joshipura, M. (2017). Beta anomaly and comparative analysis of beta arbitrage strategies. NMIMS Management Review.

  • Jylhä, P. (2018). Margin requirements and the security market line. The journal of Finance, 73(3), 1281–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karolyi, Andrew G. (2016). Home bias, an academic puzzle. Review of Finance, 20(6), 2049–2078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., Kogan, J., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Globalization and corporate governance convergence?: A cross-country analysis. Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K. P., & Brooks, R. D. (2010a). Why do emerging stock markets experience more persistent price deviations from a random walk over time? A country-level analysis. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 14(S1), 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K., & Brooks, R. D. (2010b). Are emerging stock markets less efficient? A survey of empirical literature. In Emerging markets: Performance, analysis and innovation (pp. 21–38). CRC Press.

  • Love, I., & Klapper, L. F. (2002). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. The World Bank.

  • Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1973). An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica, 41(5), 867–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. H., & Scholes, M. (1972). Rates of return in relation to risk: A reexamination of some recent findings. Studies in the theory of capital markets, 23.

  • Nishiotis, G. P. (2002). Investment barriers and international asset pricing: Evidence from closed-end country funds. Working paper, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.

  • Pandey, S., & Samanta, A. (2016). an investigation of low volatility anomaly in Indian stock market. Social Sciences, 4(01).

  • Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettengill, G. N., Sundaram, S., & Mathur, I. (1995). The conditional relation between beta and returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30(1), 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambhia, R., Joshipura, M., & Joshipura, N. (2013). Low risk anomaly: A new enemy of market efficiency. IUP Journal of Financial Risk Management, 10(3), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests Part I: On past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, B., & Gonenc, H. (2010). Pecking order behavior in emerging markets. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 21(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkowitz, M. A., & Beedles, W. L. (1978). Diversification in a three-moment world. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13(5), 927–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stattman, D. (1980). Book values and stock returns. The Chicago MBA: A Journal of Selected Papers, 4(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A., & Czapkiewicz, A. (2017). Digesting anomalies in emerging European markets: A comparison of factor pricing models. Emerging Markets Review, 31, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Accounting and Finance Area, Indian Institute of Management Kashipur, Bazpur Road, Kashipur (Udham Singh Nagar), Uttarakhand, 244713, India

    Asgar Ali & K. N. Badhani

Authors
  1. Asgar Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. N. Badhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asgar Ali.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A., Badhani, K.N. Beta-Anomaly: Evidence from the Indian Equity Market. Asia-Pac Financ Markets 28, 55–78 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-020-09316-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-020-09316-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation