Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Combustible Facade Systems with Glass, ACP and Firestops in Full-Scale, Real Fire Experiments

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combustible facade systems used in modern buildings envelops have received much attention in recent times due to their involvement in propagation of accidental fires in such buildings. This study presents findings from four full-scale real fire experiments performed on a three-story structure (each room being of plan dimensions \(10'\times 20'\) and story height \(10'\)) with combustible facade systems involving firestops, aluminum composite panels and glass. Two experiments simulated external fire-spread mechanism through the leap-frog effect (one with external fire source and one with internal fire source). The other two experiments were designed to study internal fire spread mechanism due to failure of firestops, a crucial design component of facade systems which is overlooked by most standardized facade fire tests. The experiments indicated that a facade fire can reach from one story to the next in about 3 min and hence, can severely limit the response and egress time for higher floors of a building. Further, the experiments showed that the facade system was exposed to heat flux levels in excess of \(100\,\mathrm{kW}/\mathrm{m}^{2}\) with maximum temperatures reaching \(1000^{\circ }\mathrm{C}\). The existing testing standards consider lower incident flux levels and the gas burners used in most existing test methods can reach maximum temperatures of around \(700^{\circ }\mathrm{C}\) only. These findings indicate a significant gap between current testing standards and real fire performance of facade systems. A study of failure mechanisms of individual components during the experiments showed the need of considering the system in its entirety rather than performing component level testing. The importance of firestops also became evident through these experiments. Properly designed firestop system ensured good compartmentation and prevented spread of fire to the upper floors, whereas improper firestop allowed fire to spread easily to upper floors. It is expected that the insights presented in this study will be useful to improve facade designs as well as to develop more robust testing procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andresen I, Haghighat F, Heiselberg P, Li Y, Olesen BW, Perino M, Principi P, da Silva FM, Yoshie R, Zhang J (2008) State-of-the-art review: vol. 1. State-of-the-art report: NNEX 44: integrating environmentally responsive elements in buildings, vol 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark. Annex 44 Website: www.civil.aau.dk/Annex44

  2. Peng L, Ni Z, Huang X (2013) Review on the fire safety of exterior wall claddings in high-rise buildings in China. Procedia Eng 62:663–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gandhi P, Jagdish V, Karthikeyan G, Chakravarthy A, Nakrani D, Ghoroi C, Srivastava G (2017) Performance of glass-ACP façade system in a full-scale real fire test in a \(\text{ G }+2\) structure. Procedia Eng 210:512–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Rt Hon Sir Martin Moore-Bick (2019) Grenfell tower inquiry: phase 1 report. Technical report, United Kingdom

  5. Nguyen KTQ, Weerasinghe P, Mendis P, Ngo T, Barnett J (2016) Performance of modern building façades in fire: a comprehensive review. Electron J Struct Eng 16:1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. White N, Delichatsios M (2015) Fire hazards of exterior wall assemblies containing combustible components. Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. White N, Delichatsios M, Ahrens M, Kimball A (2013) Fire hazards of exterior wall assemblies containing combustible components. In: MATEC Web of conferences, vol 9, p 02005. EDP Sciences

  8. White N, Delichatsios M (2014) Fire hazards of exterior wall assemblies containing combustible components. The Fire Protection Research Foundation, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Quincy, MA

  9. Nishio Y, Yoshioka H, Noguchi T, Kanematsu M, Ando T, Hase Y, Hayakawa T (2016) Fire spread caused by combustible facades in Japan. Fire Technol 52(4), 1081–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bisby L (2018) Grenfell tower inquiry: phase 1 final expert report. Technical report, The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

  11. Kolaitis DI, Asimakopoulou EK, Founti MA (2016) A full-scale fire test to investigate the fire behaviour of the ventilated facade system. In: Proceedings of 14th international fire and engineering conference Interflam, vol 2, pp 1127–1138

  12. Bjegović D, Pečur IB, Milovanović B, Rukavina MJ, Bagarić M (2016) Comparative full-scale fire performance testing of ETICS systems. Gradevinar 68(05), 357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Östman B, Tsantaridis L (2015) Fire scenarios for multi-storey facades with emphasis on full-scale testing of wooden facades. Fire Technol 51(6), 1495–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kotthoff I, Riemesch-Speer J (2013) Mechanism of fire spread on facades and the new technical report of EOTA “large-scale fire performance testing of external wall cladding systems”. In: MATEC Web of conferences, vol 9, p 02010. EDP Sciences

  15. Srivastava G, Ghoroi C, Gandhi P, Jagdish V, Karthikeyan G, Chakravarthy A, Nakrani D (2018) Development of a unique full-scale real-fire façade testing facility at IIT Gandhinagar. Curr Sci 115(9):1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kayacan I, Doğan ÖM (2008) Pyrolysis of low and high density polyethylene. part I: non-isothermal pyrolysis kinetics. Energy Sources Part A 30(5):385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah J, Jan MR, Mabood F, Jabeen F (2010) Catalytic pyrolysis of ldpe leads to valuable resource recovery and reduction of waste problems. Energy Convers Manag 51(12), 2791–2801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bystritskaya EV, Karpukhin ON, Tsverava VG, Nepovinnykh VI, Rusin MY (2011) Thermal degradation of silicone sealant. Int Polym Sci Technol 38:47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Building Code of India Part 4 Fire and Life Safety (2005) Standard, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  20. Zalok E, Eng P (2011) Validation of methodologies to determine fire load for use in structural fire protection. The Fire Protection Research Foundation, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Quincy, MA

  21. EN 1991-1-2 Eurocode 1: action on structures—part 1-2: general actions–actions on structures exposed to fire. Standard, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (2002)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of this work from the Centre for Safety Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar and Underwriters Laboratories is gratefully acknowledged. Partial support from industry partners Shah Bhogilal Jethalal and Brothers and Hilti India Pvt. Ltd. is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Srivastava.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastava, G., Nakrani, D. & Ghoroi, C. Performance of Combustible Facade Systems with Glass, ACP and Firestops in Full-Scale, Real Fire Experiments. Fire Technol 56, 1575–1598 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00943-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00943-4

Keywords

Navigation