Skip to main content
Log in

The cohesive band model: a cohesive surface formulation with stress triaxiality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the cohesive surface model cohesive tractions are transmitted across a two-dimensional surface, which is embedded in a three-dimensional continuum. The relevant kinematic quantities are the local crack opening displacement and the crack sliding displacement, but there is no kinematic quantity that represents the stretching of the fracture plane. As a consequence, in-plane stresses are absent, and fracture phenomena as splitting cracks in concrete and masonry, or crazing in polymers, which are governed by stress triaxiality, cannot be represented properly. In this paper we extend the cohesive surface model to include in-plane kinematic quantities. Since the full strain tensor is now available, a three-dimensional stress state can be computed in a straightforward manner. The cohesive band model is regarded as a subgrid scale fracture model, which has a small, yet finite thickness at the subgrid scale, but can be considered as having a zero thickness in the discretisation method that is used at the macroscopic scale. The standard cohesive surface formulation is obtained when the cohesive band width goes to zero. In principle, any discretisation method that can capture a discontinuity can be used, but partition-of-unity based finite element methods and isogeometric finite element analysis seem to have an advantage since they can naturally incorporate the continuum mechanics. When using interface finite elements, traction oscillations that can occur prior to the opening of a cohesive crack, persist for the cohesive band model. Example calculations show that Poisson contraction influences the results, since there is a coupling between the crack opening and the in-plane normal strain in the cohesive band. This coupling holds promise for capturing a variety of fracture phenomena, such as delamination buckling and splitting cracks, that are difficult, if not impossible, to describe within a conventional cohesive surface model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babuska I, Melenk JM (1997) The partition of unity method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40:727–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Oh B (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. RILEM Mater Struct 16:155–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Belytschko T, Fish J, Engelman BE (1988) A finite element with embedded localization zones. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 70:59–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:601–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33:2899–2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R, Gutiérrez MA (1999) A unified framework for concrete damage and fracture models including size effects. Int J Fract 95:261–277

    Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R, Remmers JJC, Needleman A (2006) Mesh-independent discrete numerical representations of cohesive-zone models. Eng Fract Mech 73:160–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R, Réthoré J, Abellan MA (2006) Numerical approach for arbitrary cracks in a fluid-saturated porous medium. Arch Appl Mech 75:595–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R (2006) Modern domain-based discretization methods for damage and fracture. Int J Fract 138:241–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R, Crisfield MA, Remmers JJC, Verhoosel CV (2012) Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith AA (1920) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans 221:163–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth I yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R (1962) Accelerations waves in solids. J Mech Phys Solids 10:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillerborg A, Modeér M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6:773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huespe AE, Needleman A, Oliver J, Sanchez PJ (2009) A finite thickness band method for ductile fracture analysis. Int J Plast 25:2349–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huespe AE, Needleman A, Oliver J, Sanchez PJ (2012) A finite strain, finite band method for modeling ductile fracture International. J Plast 28:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin GR (1957) Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. ASME J Appl Mech 24:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller K, Weihe S, Siegmund T, Kröplin B (1999) Generalized cohesive zone model: incorporating triaxiality dependent failure mechanisms. Comput Mater Sci 16:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moës N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive cracks. Eng Fract Mech 69:813–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needleman A (1987) A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion of debonding. J Appl Mech 54:525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz M, Leroy Y, Needleman A (1987) A finite element method for localized failure analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 61:189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, de Vree HPJ (1996) Gradient-enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:3391–3403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijaudier-Cabot G, Bažant ZP (1987) Nonlocal damage theory. ASCE J Eng Mech 113:1512–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remmers JJC, de Borst R, Needleman A (2003) A cohesive segments method for the simulation of crack growth. Comput Mech 31:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Réthoré J, de Borst R, Abellan MA (2007) A discrete model for the dynamic propagation of shear bands in fluid-saturated medium. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31:347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Réthoré J, de Borst R, Abellan MA (2008) A two-scale model for fluid flow in an unsaturated porous medium with cohesive cracks. Comput Mech 42:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JR (1976) The localization of plastic deformation. In: Koiter WT, vol. 1, (eds) Theoretical and applied mechanics (Proceedings of the 14th international congress on theoretical and applied mechanics). North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 207–220

  • Rots JG (1991) Smeared and discrete representations of localized fracture. Int J Fract 51:45–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schellekens JCJ, de Borst R (1993a) On the numerical integration of interface elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36:43–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellekens JCJ, de Borst R (1993b) A nonlinear finite-element approach for the analysis of mode I free edge delamination in composites. Int J Solids Struct 30:1239–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegmund T, Brocks W (2000) A numerical study on the correlation between the work of separation and the dissipation rate in ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 67:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simo JC, Oliver J, Armero F (1993) An analysis of strong discontinuities induced by softening relations in rate-independent solids. Comput Mech 12:277–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simone A (2004) Partition of unity-based discontinuous elements for interface phenomena: computational issues. Commun Numer Methods Eng 20:465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssens MGA, van der Giessen E, Sluys LJ (2000) Modeling of crazing using a cohesive surface methodology. Mech Mater 32:19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoosel CV, Remmers JJC, Gutiérrez MA (2009) A dissipation-based arc-length method for robust simulation of brittle and ductile failure. Int J Numer Methods Eng 77:1290–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (2011) An isogeometric approach to cohesive zone modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87:336–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells GN, Sluys LJ (2001) A new method for modelling cohesive cracks using finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2667–2682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells GN, de Borst R, Sluys LJ (2002) A consistent geometrically non-linear approach for delamination. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54:1333–1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack-growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42:1397–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René de Borst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Remmers, J.J.C., de Borst, R., Verhoosel, C.V. et al. The cohesive band model: a cohesive surface formulation with stress triaxiality. Int J Fract 181, 177–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9834-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9834-3

Keywords

Navigation