Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fate and efficiency of 15N-labelled slow- and controlled-release fertilizers

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slow- and controlled-release N fertilizers are designed to increase efficiency and reduce N losses by better synchronizing N availability with plant demand. This paper reviews the use of 15N with these fertilizers to collect quantitative data on the efficiency, residual value and N losses for which relatively few data are available compared with conventional labelled urea and ammonium-based fertilizers. In general, studies of slow-release forms (isobutylidene diurea, oxamide, ureaform) with rice and upland crops show one or more benefits, including improved N uptake efficiency, and reduced N losses via leaching or NH3 volatilization under conditions which favor such losses (coarse textured soils, alkaline pH, respectively). Benefits from residual 15N may accrue in the year following application. Studies with controlled-release 15N-labelled sulfur coated urea (SCU) show benefits in situations such as paddy soils where losses from broadcast urea are a substantial problem. In experiments with 15N polyolefin-coated urea (POCU), rice plant recovery of broadcast conventional urea or ammonium salts ranged from 24 % with losses of 50–45 % with losses of 33 %. Where 15N labelled SCU or POCU was used, the rice recovery ranged from 26 % with losses of 14–72 % with losses of 10 %. Experiments using POCU with corn, barley and potato show similar results. The paucity of published data obtained using 15N points to the need for further studies that will provide concrete evidence for the development of innovative fertilizers with enhanced efficiency and an evidence-based set of recommendations for their selection and use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acquaye S, Inubushi K (2004) Comparative effects of app1ication of coated and non-coated urea in clayey and sandy paddy soi1 microcosms examined by the 15N tracer technique. I. Effects on growth, N uptake, and yield of rice crop. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50:205–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama H, Yan XY, Yagi K (2010) Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 16:1837–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen AL, Stevenson FJ, Kurtz LT (1973) Chemical distribution of residual fertilizer nitrogen in soil as revealed by nitrogen-15 studies. J Environ Qual 2:120–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azeem B, KuShaari KZ, Man ZB, Basit A, Thanh TH (2014) Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. J Control Release 181:11–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton JD, Hubbard WA, Speer RC (1967) Coated urea, thiourea, urea-formaldehyde, hexamine, oxamide, glycoluril, and oxidized nitrogen-enriched coal as slowly available sources of nitrogen for orchardgrass. Agron J 59:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergner H, Görsch R (1979) Metabolism of labelled isobutylidene diurea in sheep. Ann Rech Vét 10:382–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MA, Volk GM (1966) Evaluation of ureaform fertilizer using nitrogen-15-labelled materials in sandy soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 30:278–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calancea L, Bologa M, Chiriac M (1990) Utilization of 15N to evaluate the availability of nitrogen from different fertilizers for Lolium multiflorum. Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Biologia 35:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter MF, Vlek PLG, Touchton JT (1986) Agronomic evaluation of new ureaforms for flooded rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1055–1060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Suter H, Islam A, Edis R, Freney JR, Walker CN (2008) Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: a review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers. Soil Res 46:289–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson CB, Carter MF, Holt LS (1988) Mineralization and nitrification of ureaform fertilizers. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 17:85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Craswell ET, Godwin DC (1984) The efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to cereals grown in different climates. In: Lauchli A, Tinker PB (eds) Advances in plant nutrition. Praeger Publishers, New York, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Craswell ET, De Datta SK, Hartantyo M, Obcemea WN (1981) Time and mode of nitrogen fertilizer application to tropical wetland rice. Fert Res 2:247–259

  • Craswell ET, De Datta SK, Weeraratne CS, Vlek PLG (1985) Fate and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to wetland rice. I. The Philippines. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 6:49–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Nobili M, Santi S, Mondini C (1992) Fate of nitrogen (15N) from oxamide and urea applied to turf grass: a lysimeter study. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 33:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado JA, Mosier AR (1996) Mitigation alternatives to decrease nitrous oxides emissions and urea-nitrogen loss and their effect on methane flux. J Environ Qual 25:1105–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeMent JD, Hunt CM, Stanford G (1961) Nitrogen fertilizers, hydrolysis, nitrification, and nitrogen availability of oxamide, as influenced by granule size. J Agric Food Chem 9:453–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelstad OP, Getsinger JG, Stangel PJ (1972) Tailoring of fertilizers for rice. Bulletin Y-52. National Fertilizer Development Centre, TVA, Muscle Shoals

  • Fillery IRP, Vlek PLG (1986) Reappraisal of the significance of ammonia volatilization as an N loss mechanism in flooded rice fields. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 9:79–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JB, Drinkwater LE (2009) The fate of nitrogen in grain cropping systems: a meta-analysis of 15N field experiments. Ecol Applic 19:2167–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez ME, Gonzalez A, Toro CA, Cea M, Sepúlveda N, Diez MC, Navia R (2012) Biochar as a renewable matrix for the development of encapsulated and immobilized novel added-value bioproducts. J Biobased Mat Bio 6:237–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guertal EA (2009) Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers in vegetable production: a review. Hort Technol 19:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck RD (1994) Synthesis of 15N-labelled isobutylidene diurea, oxamide, and ureaforms for use in agronomic studies. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25:191–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WA., Rodney PB, Fearon CG, Ogiste LG (1980) Field studies of N-15 labelled urea and isobutylidene diurea. III. Residual fertilizer N recovery by ryegrass. In: Agronomy Abstracts, 72nd annual meeting, American Society of Agronomy, p 168

  • Hossain MZ, Shibuya K, Saigusa M (2001) No-tillage transplanting system of rice with controlled availability fertilizer in the nursery box. II. Improvement of the initial growth of rice in the no-tillage transplanting system. Tohoku J Agric Sci 51:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Inubushi K, Acquaye S, Tsukagoshi S, Shibahara F, Komatsu S (2002) Effects of controlled-release coated urea (CRCU) on soil microbial biomass N in paddy fields examined by the 15N tracer technique. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 63:291–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jahns T, Kaltwasser H (2000) Mechanism of microbial degradation of slow-release fertilizers. J Polymer Environ 8:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahns T, Schepp R, Kaltwasser H (1997) Purification and characterisation of an enzyme from a strain of Ochrobactrum anthroi that degrades condensation products of urea and formaldehyde (ureaform). Can J Microbiol 43:1111–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamekawa K, Nagai T, Sekiya S, Yoneyama T (1990) Nitrogen uptake by paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.) from15N labelled coated urea and ammonium sulfate. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36:333–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanno H (2008) Uptake process and recovery of co-situs applied polyolefin-coated urea as affected by release pattern on corn (Zea mays) under humid climate in Northeastern Japan. Tohoku J Agric Res 58:65–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katyal JC, Singh B, Vlek PLG, Craswell ET (1985) Fate and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to wetland rice. II. Punjab, India. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 6:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ, Six J, van Kessel C (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Adv Agron 87:85–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li G-H, Zhao L-P, Zhang S-X, Hosen Y, Yagi K (2011) Recovery and leaching of 15N-labelled coated urea in a lysimeter system in the North China Plain. Pedosphere 21:763–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt OR, Clark SB (1969) Properties and value of 1, l-diureido isobutane (IBDU) as a long-lasting nitrogen fertilizer. J Agric Food Chem 17:1269–1271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan KT, Cushman KE, Sato S (2009) Release mechanisms for slow- and controlled-release fertilizers and strategies for their use in vegetable production. Hort Technol 19:10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray TP, Austin ER, Howard RG, Bradford TJ (1985) Reactions of molten urea with formaldehyde. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 24:420–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogiste LG, Hill WA, Fearon CG (1980) Field studies of N-15 labelled urea and isobutylidene diurea. 1. Sweet potato yield and fertilizer N recovery. In: Agronomy Abstracts, 72nd annual meeting, American Society of Agronomy, p 173

  • Ramesh K, Reddy DD (2011) Zeolites and their potential uses in agriculture. Adv Agron 113:215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodney PB, Fearon CG, Ogiste LG, Hill WA (1982) Recovery of isotopically labelled fertilizer-N by tomato ryegrass sweet-potato rotation. Hort Sci 17:157

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio JL, Hauck RD (1986) Uptake and use patterns of nitrogen from urea, oxamide, and isobutylidene diurea by rice plants. Plant Soil 94:109–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoji S, Gandeza AT, Kimura K (1991) Simulation of crop response to polyolefin-coated urea: II. Nitrogen uptake by corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1468–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timilsena YP, Adhikari R, Casey P, Muster T, Gilla H, Adhikari B (2015) Enhanced efficiency fertilisers: a review of formulation and nutrient release patterns. J Sci Food Agric 95:1131–1142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tlustos P, Blackmer AM (1992) Release of nitrogen from ureaform fractions as influenced by soil pH. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1807–1810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trenkel ME (2010) Slow- and controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers: An option for enhancing nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. Int Fert Assoc, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerman RL, Kurtz LT (1972) Residual effects of 15N-labelled fertilizers in a field study. Soil Sci Soc Am J 36:91–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman RL, Kurtz LT, Hauck RD (1972) Recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizers in field experiments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 36:82–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zvomuya F, Rosen CJ, Russelle MP, Gupta SC (2003) Nitrate leaching and nitrogen recovery following application of polyolefin-coated urea to potato. J Environ Qual 32:480–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The senior author thanks the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) for a visiting scientist fellowship (Pesquisador Visitante No 101.466/2014), EMBRAPA-Solos as the host Institution and the University of Melbourne for financial assistance with travel expenses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric T. Craswell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chalk, P.M., Craswell, E.T., Polidoro, J.C. et al. Fate and efficiency of 15N-labelled slow- and controlled-release fertilizers. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 102, 167–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9697-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9697-2

Keywords

Navigation