Abstract
Fuzzy risk analysis is widely used in risk assessment of components by linguistic terms. Fuzzy numbers are used to quantify the associated uncertainty. This study employs fuzzy risk analysis to evaluate processes for implementing statistical process control (SPC) in a specified manufacturing system. To reach this goal, fuzzy risk analysis has been applied based on both ranking and similarity of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers in a stepwise procedure. Therefore, a new approach has been introduced for fuzzy risk analysis of processes to overcome the shortcomings of previous fuzzy risk analysis approaches. As a result, fuzzy risk analysis is used as a decision making technique to select critical processes under uncertainty. Also, the application of the proposed SPC implementation algorithm is illustrated in the manufacturing line of a car battery factory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ament C, Goch G (2001) A process oriented approach to automated quality control. CIRP A Manuf Technol 50(1):251–254
Antony J, Balbontin A, Taner T (2000) Key ingredients for the effective implementation of statistical process control. Work Study 49(6):242–247
Boc K, Vaculík J, Vidriková D (2013) Risk analysis in managerial process and fuzzy approach. Transp Telecommun 14(3):214–222
Chen SH (1999) Ranking generalized fuzzy number with graded mean integration. In: Proceedings of the eighth international fuzzy systems association world congress Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Chen SJ, Chen SM (2003) Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11(1):45–56
Chen SJ, Chen SM (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl Intell 26(1):1–11
Chen S-J, Chen S-M (2008) Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Comput Math Appl 55(8):1670–1685
Chen SM, Chen JH (2009) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads. Expert Syst Appl 36(3 PART 2):6833–6842
Cook GE, Maxwell JE, Barnett RJ, Strauss AM (1997) Statistical process control application to weld process. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 33(2):454–563
Does RJM, Schippers WAJ, Trip A (1997) A framework for implementation of statistical process control. Int J Qual Sci 2(3):181–198
Goh TN, Xie M, Xie W (1998) Prioritizing processes in initial implementation of statistical process control. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 45(1):66–72
Haleh H, Khorshidi HA, Hoseini SM (2010) A new approach for fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity by using decision making approach. IEEE international conference on management of innovation and technology (ICMIT), Singapore, pp 1112–1117
Hejazi SR, Doostparast A, Hosseini SM (2011) An improved fuzzy risk analysis based on a new similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9179–9185
Hongyuan Z, Yanliang L, Jing Z (2012) Research on the health status monitoring model and monitoring system of destruction equipment for high-risk goods based on the fuzzy combination mode. Prognostics and system health management (PHM), 2012 IEEE conference on, 23–25 May 2012, pp 1–6
Khorshidi HA, Gunawan I, Esmaeilzadeh F (2013) Implementation of SPC with FMEA in less-developed industries with a case study in car battery manufactory. Int J Qual Innov 2(2):148–157
Madhuri KU, Babu SS, Shankar NR (2014) Fuzzy risk analysis based on the novel fuzzy ranking with new arithmetic operations of linguistic fuzzy numbers. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(5):2391–2401
Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
Mousavi SM, Jolai F, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2013) A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems. Group Decis Negot 22(2):207–233
Nugent TP (1994) Improved roll texturing through implementation of statistical process control. Iron Steelmak 21(6):21–27
Patra K, Mondal SK (2015) Fuzzy risk analysis using area and height based similarity measure on generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its application. Appl Soft Comput J 28:276–284
Roes KCB, Dorr D (1997) Implementing statistical process control in service processes. Int J Qual Sci 2(3):149–166
Schmucker KJ (1984) Fuzzy sets, natural language computations, and risk analysis. Computer Science Press, MD
Shewhart WA (1980) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee
Simpson DS, Roberts T, Walker C, Cooper KD, O’brien F (2005) Using statistical process control (SPC) chart techniques to support data quality and information proficiency: the underpinning structure of high-quality health care. Qual Prim Care 13(1):37–43
Wang Y-M, Elhag TMS (2006) Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl 31(2):309–319
Wei SH, Chen SM (2009) A new approach for fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generaliazed fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Appl 36:589–598
Ye J (2012) Multicriteria group decision-making method using vector similarity measures for trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Group Decis Negot 21(4):519–530
Yong D, Qi L (2005) A TOPSIS-based centroid-index ranking method of fuzzy numbers and its application in decision-making. Cybern Syst 36(6):581–595
Zhang WR (1986) Knowledge representation using linguistic fuzzy relations, PhD Thesis, University of South Carolina
Zhao X (2011) A process oriented quality control approach based on dynamic SPC and FMEA repository. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 18(8):444–451
Zhao X, Ma YB, Rui C, Bai XL, Ning LY (2009) Research and application of intelligent quality control system based on FMEA repository. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information technology and computer science Kiev, Ukrine
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khorshidi, H.A., Gunawan, I. & Nikfalazar, S. Application of Fuzzy Risk Analysis for Selecting Critical Processes in Implementation of SPC with a Case Study. Group Decis Negot 25, 203–220 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9439-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9439-5