Abstract
In this paper, we describe an approach to rank sport players based on their efficiency. Although is extremely useful to analyze the performance of team games there is no unanimity on the use of a single index to perform such a ranking. We propose a method to summarize the huge amount of information collected at different aspects of a sport team which is almost daily publicly available. The tool will allow agents involved in a player’s negotiation to show the strengths (and weaknesses) of the player with respect to other players. The approach is based on applying a multicriteria outranking methodology using as alternatives the potential players and as criteria different efficiency indices. A novel automatic parameter tuning approach is detailed that will allow coaches and sports managers to design templates and sports strategies that improve the efficiency of their teams. We report the results performed over the available information on the ACB Basketball League, and we show how it can be easily implemented and interpreted in practice by decision-makers non familiar with the mathematical side of the methodology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alamar BC (2013) Sports analytics: a guide for coaches, managers, and other decision. Columbia University Press, New York
Berri DJ, Bradbury JC (2010) Working in the land of metricians. J Sports Econ 11(1):29–47
Berri DJ, Krautmann AC (2006) Shrinking on the court: testing for the incentives effects of guaranteed pay. Econ Inq 44(3):536–546
Berri DJ, Brook SL, Schmidt MB (2007) Does one simply need to score to score? Int J Sport Finance 2:142–148
Brans JP, Mareschal B (1992) Promethee-V: MCDM problems with segmentation constraints. INFOR 30(2):85–96
Brans JP, Mareschal B (1994) The Promcalc and Gaia decision-support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decis Support Syst 12(4–5):297–310
Brans JP, Mareschal B (1995) The PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. J Decis Syst 4:213–223
Brans JP, Mareschal B (2016) PROMETHEE methods. In: Greco S, Figueira J, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin, pp 187–219
Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Manag Sci 31(6):647–656 (1985, d’Avenir, 183–213, Presses de L’Université Laval)
Cooper WW, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2009) Selecting non-zero weights to evaluate effectiveness of basketball players with DEA. Eur J Oper Res 195:563–574
Corrente S, Figueira JR, Greco S (2014) The SMAA-PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 239(2):514522
Decision Lab 2000 (1999) Getting started guide. Visual Decision Inc. Montreal, Canada. Replaced by Visual PROMETHEE. http://www.promethee-gaia.net
Drust B (2010) Performance analysis research: meeting the challenge. J Sports Sci 28(9):921–922
Greco A, Figueira JR, Ehrgott M (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin
Gutiérrez O, Ruiz JL (2013) Data envelopment analysis and cross-efficency evaluation in the management of sport teams: the assessment of game performance of players in the Spanish handball league. J Sport Manag 27(3):217–229
Heeren D (1992) Basketball abstract. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Jochemczyk LW, Nowak A (2010) Constructing a network of shared agreement: a model of communication processes in negotiations. Group Decis Negot 19(6):591–620
Lewin D, Rosenbaum DT (2007) The pot calling the kettle black. Are NBA statistical models more irrational than “irrational” decision-makers?. In: New England symposium on statistics in sports, Harvard University Science Center
Llamazares B (2018) An analysis of the generalized TODIM method. Eur J Oper Res 270:1
Mertz J, Hoover LD, Burke JM, Bellar D, Jones ML, Leitzelar B, Judge WL (2016) Ranking the greatest NBA players: a sport metrics analysis. Int J Perform Anal Sport 13(3):737–759
Montajabiha M (2016) An extended PROMETHE II multi-criteria group decision making technique based on intuitionistic fuzzy logic for sustainable energy planning. Group Decis Negot 25(2):221–244
Oliver D (2004) Basketball on paper. Rules and tools for performance analysis. Brasseys INC, Washington
Puente C, Del Coso J, Salinero JJ, Abián-Vicén J (2015) Basketball performance indicators during the ACB regular season from 2003 to 2013. Int J Perform Anal Sport 15(3):935–948
Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Nonconvex optimization and its appli-cations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL, Ergu D (2015) When is a decision-making method trustworthy? criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 14(6):1171–1187
Soylu B (2010) Integrating Promethee II with the Tchebycheff function for multi criteria decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 9(4):525–545
Winston WL (2009) Mathletics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Zhang W, Ju Y, Gomes LFAM (2017) The SMAA-TODIM approach: modeling of preferences and a robustness analysis framework. Comput Ind Eng 114:130–141
Ziv G, Lidor R, Arnon M (2010) Predicting team rankings in basketball: the questionable use of on-court performance statistics. Int J Perform Anal Sport 10(2):103–114
Živković Ž, Nikolić D, Savić M, Djordjević P, Mihajlović I (2017) Prioritizing strategic goals in higher education organizations by using a SWOT-PROMETHEE/GAIAGDSS model. Group Decis Negot 26(4):829–846
Acknowledgements
The first and second authors were partially supported by project PP2016-PIP06 (Universidad de Granada) and the research group SEJ-534 (Junta de Andalucía). The first author was also partially supported by Project MTM2016-74983-C2-1-R (MINECO, Spain).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blanco, V., Salmerón, R. & Gómez-Haro, S. A Multicriteria Selection System Based on Player Performance: Case Study—The Spanish ACB Basketball League. Group Decis Negot 27, 1029–1046 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9583-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9583-9