Abstract
The development of employability skills is an important graduate outcome of most contemporary university degrees. Given the critical role of academics in teaching and assessing curriculum, they are held responsible for furthering the employability skills development of university graduates; yet little is known about the factors that hinder academics in integrating employability skills into the university curriculum. Based on the Theories of Action Framework, this research compared academics’ espoused understanding of employability skills and reported practice against their actual practices to identify the hindrances. Their understandings of employability skills and of their espoused practice were collected through interviews with academics and content analysis of curriculum documents. The data, drawn from direct observation of teaching and assessment practices and follow-up interviews, were analysed to investigate actual teaching and assessment practices. The findings indicate a disjuncture between espoused practice and actual practice. The disjuncture can be explained by the individual nature of teaching and assessment practice that is influenced by academic experience, position, and disciplinary boundaries. As such, academics face a number of competing challenges, constraints, and demands within the scope of their practice that impede the consistent and systematic integration of employability skills in the university curriculum.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this study, ‘academics’ refers to subject coordinators/lecturers (who design and deliver the curriculum) and tutors (also known as teaching assistants, graduate student instructors, casual academics, sessional staff or teachers, hourly paid staff and graduate teaching assistants) who deliver and assess, but do not design, the curriculum.
References
Argyris, S. E., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in ‘close-up’ research on teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 151–158.
Barnett, R., Gareth, P., & Coate, K. (2001). Conceptualising curriculum change. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 435–449.
Bennett, A., Dunne, E., & Carre, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 71–93.
Bennett, D., Richardson, S., & McKinnon, P. (2016). Enacting strategies for graduate employability: How universities can best support students to develop generic skills. Office for Learning and Teaching. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/.
Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A32134.
Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.
Clanchy, J., & Ballard, B. (1995). Generic skills in the context of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 14(2), 156–166.
Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basic qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage.
Cranmer, S. (2006). Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 169–181.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thoussand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
CSfW. (2013). Core Skills for Work Development Framework. edited by Innovation Department of Industry, Climate Change,Science, Research and Tertiary Education and Department of Educaton, Employment and Workplace Relations. Canberra.
Curtis, D., and P. McKenzie. 2001. Employability skills for Australian industry: Literature review and framework development: Report to the Business Council of Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Curtis6/publication/
de la Harpe, B., & David, C. (2012). Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 493–510.
de la Harpe, B., Radloff, A., & Wyber, J. (2000). Quality and generic (professional) skills. Quality in Higher Education, 6(3), 231–243.
DEEWR. (2012). Employability skills framework stage 1: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
DEST. (2002). Employability skills for the future. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Department of Education, Science and Training.
Ferns, S., & Lilly, L. (2015). Driving institutional engagement in WIL: Enhancing graduate employability. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1), 116–133.
Finch, D. J., Leah, K. H., Baldwin, R., & Zehner, M. (2013). An exploratory study of factors affecting undergraduate employability. Education & Training, 55(7), 681–704.
Freudenberg, B., Brimble, M., & Cameron, C. (2011). WIL and generic skill development: The development of business students’ generic skills through work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific journal of Cooperative Education, 12(2), 79–83.
GCA. (2016). Graduate outlook 2015: The report of the 2015 Graduate Outlook Survey: Perspectives on graduate recruitment. Graduate Careers Australia Ltd http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Graduate-Outlook-Report-2015-FINAL1.pdf.
Gregory, J., & Jones, R. (2009). ‘Maintaining Competence’: A grounded theory typology of approaches to teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 57(6), 769–785.
Harris-Reeves, B., & Mahoney, J. (2017). Brief work-integrated learning opportunities and first-year university students’ perceptions of employability and academic performance. Australian Journal of Career Development, 26(2), 32–37.
Holmes, L. (2013). Competing perspectives on graduate employability: Possession, position or process? Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 538–554.
Jackson, D. (2009). An international profile of industry-relevant competencies and skill gaps in modern graduates. International Journal of Management Education, 8(3), 29–58.
Jackson, D. (2012). Business undergraduates’ perceptions of their capabilities in employability skills: Implications for industry and higher education. Industry & Higher Education, 26(5), 345–356.
Jackson, D. (2013). Business graduate employability - where are we going wrong? Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 776–790.
Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012a). Non-technical competencies in undergraduate business degree programs: Australian and UK perspectives. Studies in Higher Education, 37(5), 541–567.
Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012b). Non-technical skill gaps in Australian business graduates. Education & Training, 54(2/3), 95–113.
Jones, A. (2010). Generic attributes in accounting: The significance of the disciplinary context. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 19(1–2), 5–21.
Kerr, P. (2009). Espoused theories and theories-in-use of information literacy: A model for reflection and evaluation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
Kerr, P. (2010). "Conceptions and practice of information literacy n academic libraries: Espoused theories and theories in use." Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Communication, Information and Library Studies, Graduate School - New Brunswick, Rugers, The State University of New Jersey.
Kinash, S., Crane, L., Judd, M., & Knight, C. (2016). Discrepant stakeholder perspectives on graduate employability strategies. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 951–967.
KPMG. (2014). War for talent: Time to change direction. https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/07/war-for-talent.pdf
Leong, R., & Kavanagh, M. (2013). A work-integrated learning (WIL) framework to develop graduate skills and attributes in an Australian university’s accounting program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(1), 1–14.
Mayer, E. (1992). Key competencies: Report of the committee to advise the Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment on employment-related key competencies for post compulsory education and training. Canberra: Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment and Training.
McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C., Clement, M., & Light, G. (2009). Rethinking our underlying assumptions about what we do and why we do it: Academic development as a case. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(3), 261–280.
McMurray, S., Dutton, M., McQuaid, R., & Richard, A. (2016). Employer demands from business graduates. Education & Training, 58(1), 112–132.
Messum, D., Wilkes, L., Peters, K., & Jackson, D. (2016). Content analysis of vacancy advertisements for employability skills: Challenges and opportunities for informing curriculum development. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: California: SAGE.
Oliver, B. (2015). Assuring graduate capabilities: Evidencing levels of achievement for graduate employability. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching.
Oliver, B., & Whelan, B. (2011). Designing an e-portfolio for assurance of learning focusing on adoptability and learning analytics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 1026–1041.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand oaks: Sage Publications.
Radloff, A., de la Harpe, B., Dalton, H., Thomas, J., & Lawson, A. (2008). Assessing graduate attributes: Engaging academic staff and their students. ATN Assessment, 1(1).
Suleman, F. (2016). Employability skills of higher education graduates: Little consensus on a much-discussed subject. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 169–174.
Suleman, F. (2018). The employability skills of higher education graduates: Insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education, 76(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: California: SAGE.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Dr. Chi Baik and Ron Baird for helpful comments on drafts of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1. Semi-structural interview questions
Interview protocol: Semi-structured interviews.
Project: An examination of the extent that academics integrate employability skills in the business curriculum
Date of interview | |
Time of interview | |
Place | |
Interviewer | |
Interviewee: | |
Position of interviewee: | |
Project Description | |
Proposed Questions | |
1. What is your understanding of employability skills? | |
2. What skills do you think your students should possess upon the completion of your subject? | |
3. What would you describe as your role in preparing future graduates with required employability skills? | |
4. What do you know about the university’s direction with regard to the integration of employability skills within curriculum? | |
5. To what extent is the integration of employability skills integrated at the program level of your faculty? | |
6. What do you think is the best way to prepare students with a broad range of skills that will prepare them for employment in the workplace? • What is the purpose of lectures/tutorials/workshops/e-learning delivery? • What is the purpose of assessment? • Room that you teach from – is it conducive to the practice/learning of employability skills? | |
7. Have you made any recent changes to your curriculum that seeks to include employability skills? If yes, in what ways? If not, why not? | |
8. Do you see the need to make changes to your curriculum in the future? Why/Why not? | |
9. Other questions/notes |
Appendix 2. Selected subjects and classroom types (for each macrogenre)
Subjects | Macrogenre sequence of lessons over 12 weeks | ||
---|---|---|---|
Classroom type observed | 1 class per week | Duration | |
First year accounting | Lectures | 12 weeks | 2 h |
Tutorials | 12 weeks | 1 h | |
Third year accounting | Lectures | 12 weeks | 2 h |
Workshop | 12 weeks | 1.5 h | |
First year economics | Lectures | 12 weeks | 2 h (2 × 1 h) |
Tutorials | 12 weeks | 1 h | |
Third year economics | Lectures | 12 weeks | 2 h (2 × 1 h) |
Tutorials | 12 weeks | 1 h |
Appendix 3. The observational protocol
Direct observation of teaching practice protocol
Project: An examination of the extent that academics integrate employability skills in the business curriculum
Description Notes | Reflection Notes |
Subject Code/Name | |
Semester | |
Week Number | |
Date of observation | |
Time of Observation | |
Observer: | |
Academic being observed: | |
Position of individual being observed: | |
Topic | |
Type of teaching delivery | |
Describe place of observation (layout, physical setting) | |
Introduction/Opening to teaching delivery | |
Describe Teaching delivery | |
Closing |
Appendix 4. Follow-up semi-structured interview questions
Interview protocol: Follow-up semi-structured interviews
Project: An examination of the extent that academics integrate employability skills in the business curriculum
Date of follow-up interview | |
Time of follow-up interview | |
Place | |
Interviewer | |
Interviewee: | |
Position of interviewee: | |
Project Description | |
Questions about curriculum documentation | |
1. Tell more about learning outcome (x, y, z) | |
2. Give me an example of how you set out to ensure learning outcome (x, y, z) was achieved by the students. | |
3. Tell me more about (x, y, z) learning and teaching activity? Why was this included? What are the benefits it has for student learning or the acquisition of employability skills | |
Questions about observed teaching and learning activities (including any online activities) | |
1. Tell me more about (example of observed teaching activity). | |
2. Why did you decide to do (example) during (specific tutorial/lecture/workshop)? | |
3. What is the purpose of (example of activity/questions/tasks)? | |
Questions about assessment and feedback | |
1. Describe the skills students gained from completing assessment (a, b, c). | |
2. Describe what ways did assessment (a, b, c) provide students with the | |
3. Describe in what ways do you see feedback on assessment as a means to allow students to reflect on the skills gained/practiced/enhanced. | |
4. In what way does feedback on assessment provide students the opportunity to learn what skills are important for employment? | |
Other questions/comments |
Appendix 5
Appendix 6. Observed practice overview
Appendix 7. Employability skills identified in assessment tasks
Subject and year | Analysis skills | Critical thinking skills | Written skills | Verbal skills | Teamwork skills |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First year accounting | |||||
Tutorial participation and contribution | ✓ | ||||
Group assignment | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Final exam | ✓ | ||||
Third year accounting | |||||
Workshop participation and contribution | ✓ | ||||
Test | |||||
Group assignment | ✓ | ✓ | |||
Final exam | ✓ | ||||
First year economics | |||||
Tutorial participation and attendance | |||||
Multiple choice test online | |||||
Assignment 1 | ✓ | ✓ | |||
Assignment 2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
Final exam | |||||
Third year economics | |||||
Tutorial participation and attendance | |||||
Group assignment 1 | ✓ | ||||
Group assignment 2 | ✓ | ||||
Mid-semester exam | |||||
Final exam |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cotronei-Baird, V.S. Academic hindrances in the integration of employability skills development in teaching and assessment practice. High Educ 79, 203–223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00405-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00405-4