Skip to main content
Log in

Academic hindrances in the integration of employability skills development in teaching and assessment practice

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of employability skills is an important graduate outcome of most contemporary university degrees. Given the critical role of academics in teaching and assessing curriculum, they are held responsible for furthering the employability skills development of university graduates; yet little is known about the factors that hinder academics in integrating employability skills into the university curriculum. Based on the Theories of Action Framework, this research compared academics’ espoused understanding of employability skills and reported practice against their actual practices to identify the hindrances. Their understandings of employability skills and of their espoused practice were collected through interviews with academics and content analysis of curriculum documents. The data, drawn from direct observation of teaching and assessment practices and follow-up interviews, were analysed to investigate actual teaching and assessment practices. The findings indicate a disjuncture between espoused practice and actual practice. The disjuncture can be explained by the individual nature of teaching and assessment practice that is influenced by academic experience, position, and disciplinary boundaries. As such, academics face a number of competing challenges, constraints, and demands within the scope of their practice that impede the consistent and systematic integration of employability skills in the university curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this study, ‘academics’ refers to subject coordinators/lecturers (who design and deliver the curriculum) and tutors (also known as teaching assistants, graduate student instructors, casual academics, sessional staff or teachers, hourly paid staff and graduate teaching assistants) who deliver and assess, but do not design, the curriculum.

References

  • Argyris, S. E., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in ‘close-up’ research on teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., Gareth, P., & Coate, K. (2001). Conceptualising curriculum change. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A., Dunne, E., & Carre, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D., Richardson, S., & McKinnon, P. (2016). Enacting strategies for graduate employability: How universities can best support students to develop generic skills. Office for Learning and Teaching. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/.

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A32134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clanchy, J., & Ballard, B. (1995). Generic skills in the context of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 14(2), 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basic qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage.

  • Cranmer, S. (2006). Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thoussand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSfW. (2013). Core Skills for Work Development Framework. edited by Innovation Department of Industry, Climate Change,Science, Research and Tertiary Education and Department of Educaton, Employment and Workplace Relations. Canberra.

  • Curtis, D., and P. McKenzie. 2001. Employability skills for Australian industry: Literature review and framework development: Report to the Business Council of Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Curtis6/publication/

  • de la Harpe, B., & David, C. (2012). Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Harpe, B., Radloff, A., & Wyber, J. (2000). Quality and generic (professional) skills. Quality in Higher Education, 6(3), 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEEWR. (2012). Employability skills framework stage 1: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEST. (2002). Employability skills for the future. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferns, S., & Lilly, L. (2015). Driving institutional engagement in WIL: Enhancing graduate employability. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1), 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, D. J., Leah, K. H., Baldwin, R., & Zehner, M. (2013). An exploratory study of factors affecting undergraduate employability. Education & Training, 55(7), 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, B., Brimble, M., & Cameron, C. (2011). WIL and generic skill development: The development of business students’ generic skills through work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific journal of Cooperative Education, 12(2), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • GCA. (2016). Graduate outlook 2015: The report of the 2015 Graduate Outlook Survey: Perspectives on graduate recruitment. Graduate Careers Australia Ltd http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Graduate-Outlook-Report-2015-FINAL1.pdf.

  • Gregory, J., & Jones, R. (2009). ‘Maintaining Competence’: A grounded theory typology of approaches to teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 57(6), 769–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris-Reeves, B., & Mahoney, J. (2017). Brief work-integrated learning opportunities and first-year university students’ perceptions of employability and academic performance. Australian Journal of Career Development, 26(2), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, L. (2013). Competing perspectives on graduate employability: Possession, position or process? Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 538–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (2009). An international profile of industry-relevant competencies and skill gaps in modern graduates. International Journal of Management Education, 8(3), 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (2012). Business undergraduates’ perceptions of their capabilities in employability skills: Implications for industry and higher education. Industry & Higher Education, 26(5), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (2013). Business graduate employability - where are we going wrong? Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 776–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012a). Non-technical competencies in undergraduate business degree programs: Australian and UK perspectives. Studies in Higher Education, 37(5), 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012b). Non-technical skill gaps in Australian business graduates. Education & Training, 54(2/3), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2010). Generic attributes in accounting: The significance of the disciplinary context. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 19(1–2), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, P. (2009). Espoused theories and theories-in-use of information literacy: A model for reflection and evaluation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

  • Kerr, P. (2010). "Conceptions and practice of information literacy n academic libraries: Espoused theories and theories in use." Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Communication, Information and Library Studies, Graduate School - New Brunswick, Rugers, The State University of New Jersey.

  • Kinash, S., Crane, L., Judd, M., & Knight, C. (2016). Discrepant stakeholder perspectives on graduate employability strategies. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 951–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2014). War for talent: Time to change direction. https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/07/war-for-talent.pdf

  • Leong, R., & Kavanagh, M. (2013). A work-integrated learning (WIL) framework to develop graduate skills and attributes in an Australian university’s accounting program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, E. (1992). Key competencies: Report of the committee to advise the Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment on employment-related key competencies for post compulsory education and training. Canberra: Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C., Clement, M., & Light, G. (2009). Rethinking our underlying assumptions about what we do and why we do it: Academic development as a case. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(3), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray, S., Dutton, M., McQuaid, R., & Richard, A. (2016). Employer demands from business graduates. Education & Training, 58(1), 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messum, D., Wilkes, L., Peters, K., & Jackson, D. (2016). Content analysis of vacancy advertisements for employability skills: Challenges and opportunities for informing curriculum development. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1).

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: California: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, B. (2015). Assuring graduate capabilities: Evidencing levels of achievement for graduate employability. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, B., & Whelan, B. (2011). Designing an e-portfolio for assurance of learning focusing on adoptability and learning analytics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 1026–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand oaks: Sage Publications.

  • Radloff, A., de la Harpe, B., Dalton, H., Thomas, J., & Lawson, A. (2008). Assessing graduate attributes: Engaging academic staff and their students. ATN Assessment, 1(1).

  • Suleman, F. (2016). Employability skills of higher education graduates: Little consensus on a much-discussed subject. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suleman, F. (2018). The employability skills of higher education graduates: Insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education, 76(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: California: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Dr. Chi Baik and Ron Baird for helpful comments on drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1. Semi-structural interview questions

Interview protocol: Semi-structured interviews.

Project: An examination of the extent that academics integrate employability skills in the business curriculum

Date of interview

 

Time of interview

 

Place

 

Interviewer

 

Interviewee:

 

Position of interviewee:

 

Project Description

 

Proposed Questions

1. What is your understanding of employability skills?

2. What skills do you think your students should possess upon the completion of your subject?

3. What would you describe as your role in preparing future graduates with required employability skills?

4. What do you know about the university’s direction with regard to the integration of employability skills within curriculum?

5. To what extent is the integration of employability skills integrated at the program level of your faculty?

6. What do you think is the best way to prepare students with a broad range of skills that will prepare them for employment in the workplace?

• What is the purpose of lectures/tutorials/workshops/e-learning delivery?

• What is the purpose of assessment?

• Room that you teach from – is it conducive to the practice/learning of employability skills?

7. Have you made any recent changes to your curriculum that seeks to include employability skills? If yes, in what ways? If not, why not?

8. Do you see the need to make changes to your curriculum in the future? Why/Why not?

9. Other questions/notes

Appendix 2. Selected subjects and classroom types (for each macrogenre)

Subjects

Macrogenre sequence of lessons over 12 weeks

Classroom type observed

1 class per week

Duration

First year accounting

Lectures

12 weeks

2 h

Tutorials

12 weeks

1 h

Third year accounting

Lectures

12 weeks

2 h

Workshop

12 weeks

1.5 h

First year economics

Lectures

12 weeks

2 h (2 × 1 h)

Tutorials

12 weeks

1 h

Third year economics

Lectures

12 weeks

2 h (2 × 1 h)

Tutorials

12 weeks

1 h

Appendix 3. The observational protocol

Direct observation of teaching practice protocol

Project: An examination of the extent that academics integrate employability skills in the business curriculum

Description Notes

Reflection Notes

Subject Code/Name

 

Semester

 

Week Number

 

Date of observation

 

Time of Observation

 

Observer:

 

Academic being observed:

 

Position of individual being observed:

 

Topic

 

Type of teaching delivery

 

Describe place of observation (layout, physical setting)

Introduction/Opening to teaching delivery

Describe Teaching delivery

Closing

Appendix 4. Follow-up semi-structured interview questions

Interview protocol: Follow-up semi-structured interviews

Project: An examination of the extent that academics integrate employability skills in the business curriculum

Date of follow-up interview

 

Time of follow-up interview

 

Place

 

Interviewer

 

Interviewee:

 

Position of interviewee:

 

Project Description

 

Questions about curriculum documentation

1. Tell more about learning outcome (x, y, z)

2. Give me an example of how you set out to ensure learning outcome (x, y, z) was achieved by the students.

3. Tell me more about (x, y, z) learning and teaching activity? Why was this included? What are the benefits it has for student learning or the acquisition of employability skills

Questions about observed teaching and learning activities (including any online activities)

1. Tell me more about (example of observed teaching activity).

2. Why did you decide to do (example) during (specific tutorial/lecture/workshop)?

3. What is the purpose of (example of activity/questions/tasks)?

Questions about assessment and feedback

1. Describe the skills students gained from completing assessment (a, b, c).

2. Describe what ways did assessment (a, b, c) provide students with the

3. Describe in what ways do you see feedback on assessment as a means to allow students to reflect on the skills gained/practiced/enhanced.

4. In what way does feedback on assessment provide students the opportunity to learn what skills are important for employment?

Other questions/comments

Appendix 5

Table 1 Typology: accounting academics’ observed teaching practice
Table 2 Typology: economics academics’ observed teaching practice

Appendix 6. Observed practice overview

Table 3 First year accounting lecture
Table 4 First year accounting tutorials
Table 5 Third year accounting lectures
Table 6 Third year accounting workshops
Table 7 First year economics lectures
Table 8 First year economic tutorials
Table 9 Third year economics lecture
Table 10 Third year economic tutorials

Appendix 7. Employability skills identified in assessment tasks

Subject and year

Analysis skills

Critical thinking skills

Written skills

Verbal skills

Teamwork skills

First year accounting

 

  Tutorial participation and contribution

    

  Group assignment

 

 

  Final exam

    

Third year accounting

 

  Workshop participation and contribution

    

  Test

     

  Group assignment

 

  

  Final exam

    

First year economics

  Tutorial participation and attendance

     

  Multiple choice test online

     

  Assignment 1

 

  

  Assignment 2

  

  Final exam

     

Third year economics

  Tutorial participation and attendance

     

  Group assignment 1

    

  Group assignment 2

    

  Mid-semester exam

     

  Final exam

     

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cotronei-Baird, V.S. Academic hindrances in the integration of employability skills development in teaching and assessment practice. High Educ 79, 203–223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00405-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00405-4

Keywords

Navigation