Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying Differences in Early Mathematical Skills Among Children in Head Start

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine early mathematical skill differences among preschool children in US Head Start classrooms. Latent class analysis based on six early mathematical subtest scores (i.e. counting aloud, measurement, counting objects, numbers and shapes, pattern recognition, and grouping) from a sample of 279 Head Start children yielded evidence for a high-achieving class, a typical-achieving class, and a low-achieving class, relative to other children attending Head Start. Average skill profiles of the three latent classes were in general parallel to one another, reflecting that most of the differences across latent classes were in level rather than type of skills. Changes in subtest scores over a 3-month interval indicated that the skill levels of the low-achieving class at time 2 were still below those of the typically achieving class at time 1. These findings provide evidence for skill variability among children enrolled in Head Start and a group of children who appear unlikely to demonstrate the skill level of their peers without additional instruction or intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Administration for Children and Families (2002). Head Start history. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://acf.hhs.gov/programs/hsb/about/history.htm.

  • Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J. & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2005). Mathematical thinking intervention programmes for preschool children with normal and low number sense. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. J. & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. (2007). Approaches to the teaching of creative and non-creative mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correra, J., Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (1999). Young children’s understanding of division: The relationship between division terms in a noncomputational task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, K. & West, J. (2002). Children’s reading and mathematics achievement in kindergarten and first grade. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPerna, J. C., Morgan, P. L. & Lei, P.-W. (2007). Development of Early Arithmetic, Reading, and Learning Indicators for Head Start (The EARLI Project). Semi-Annual Performance Report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families (Award No. 90YF0047/01).

  • Dowker, A. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G., Dowsett, C., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A., Klebanov, P. & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, L., Dahaene, S. & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Jordan, N. & Flojo, J. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H., Cannon, J., Eisenband, J. & Pappas, S. (2006). Mathematical thinking and learning. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood development (pp. 208–229). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N., Kaplan, D. & Hanich, L. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., Olah, L. & Locuniak, M. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroesbergen, E. & Van Luit, J. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroesbergen, E., Van Luit, J., Van Lieshout, E., Van Loosbroek, E. & Van de Rijt, B. (2009). Individual differences in early numeracy: The role of executive functions and subitizing. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 226–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. & Henry, N. (1968). Latent structure analysis. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N. & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J. & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus 6.12 [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Mathematics Educators (2004). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved May 15, 2004, from http://www.nctm.org/standards.

  • Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monto Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, J. & Howe, M. (1996). Causal attributions and reading achievement: Individual differences in low-income families. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, Y. & Case, R. (1996). Exploring the microstructure of children’s central conceptual structures in the domain of number. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between rich and poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–115). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N., Lanzi, R., Weinberg, R., Ramey, S. & Ramey, C. (2002). Familiy factors associated with high academic competence in former Head Start children at third grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. & Nah, K.-O. (2014). A comparison of the pedagogical practices of mathematics education for young children in English and South Korea. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, M. & McIntosh, D. (1996). Decision-making utility of the Bracken Basic Concept Scale in identifying at-risk preschoolers. School Psychology International, 17(3), 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M., Silbert, J. & Carnine, D. (1997). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (2005). Head Start Impact Study: First year findings. Washington, DC.

  • Vermunt, J. K. & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. J. & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities and achievement. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Shaftel, J., Glasnapp, D. & Poggio, J. (2005). Qualitative or quantitative differences? Latent class analysis of mathematical ability for special education students. The Journal of Special Education, 38(4), 194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiong Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Q., Lei, Pw., DiPerna, J.C. et al. Identifying Differences in Early Mathematical Skills Among Children in Head Start. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 1403–1423 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9552-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9552-y

Keywords

Navigation