Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine early mathematical skill differences among preschool children in US Head Start classrooms. Latent class analysis based on six early mathematical subtest scores (i.e. counting aloud, measurement, counting objects, numbers and shapes, pattern recognition, and grouping) from a sample of 279 Head Start children yielded evidence for a high-achieving class, a typical-achieving class, and a low-achieving class, relative to other children attending Head Start. Average skill profiles of the three latent classes were in general parallel to one another, reflecting that most of the differences across latent classes were in level rather than type of skills. Changes in subtest scores over a 3-month interval indicated that the skill levels of the low-achieving class at time 2 were still below those of the typically achieving class at time 1. These findings provide evidence for skill variability among children enrolled in Head Start and a group of children who appear unlikely to demonstrate the skill level of their peers without additional instruction or intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Administration for Children and Families (2002). Head Start history. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://acf.hhs.gov/programs/hsb/about/history.htm.
Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J. & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2005). Mathematical thinking intervention programmes for preschool children with normal and low number sense. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20, 131–146.
Bauer, D. J. & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3–29.
Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333–339.
Chiu, M. (2007). Approaches to the teaching of creative and non-creative mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 55–79.
Correra, J., Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (1999). Young children’s understanding of division: The relationship between division terms in a noncomputational task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 321–329.
Denton, K. & West, J. (2002). Children’s reading and mathematics achievement in kindergarten and first grade. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
DiPerna, J. C., Morgan, P. L. & Lei, P.-W. (2007). Development of Early Arithmetic, Reading, and Learning Indicators for Head Start (The EARLI Project). Semi-Annual Performance Report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families (Award No. 90YF0047/01).
Dowker, A. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 324–332.
Duncan, G., Dowsett, C., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A., Klebanov, P. & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.
Feigenson, L., Dahaene, S. & Spelke, E. (2004). Core systems of number. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.
Gersten, R., Jordan, N. & Flojo, J. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304.
Ginsburg, H., Cannon, J., Eisenband, J. & Pappas, S. (2006). Mathematical thinking and learning. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of early childhood development (pp. 208–229). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Jordan, N., Kaplan, D. & Hanich, L. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586–597.
Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 36–46.
Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., Olah, L. & Locuniak, M. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153–175.
Kroesbergen, E. & Van Luit, J. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97–114.
Kroesbergen, E., Van Luit, J., Van Lieshout, E., Van Loosbroek, E. & Van de Rijt, B. (2009). Individual differences in early numeracy: The role of executive functions and subitizing. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 226–236.
Lazarsfeld, P. & Henry, N. (1968). Latent structure analysis. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
Lo, Y., Mendell, N. & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.
Mulligan, J. & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21, 33–49.
Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus 6.12 [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
National Council of Mathematics Educators (2004). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved May 15, 2004, from http://www.nctm.org/standards.
Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monto Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.
O’Sullivan, J. & Howe, M. (1996). Causal attributions and reading achievement: Individual differences in low-income families. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 363–387.
Okamoto, Y. & Case, R. (1996). Exploring the microstructure of children’s central conceptual structures in the domain of number. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, 27–59.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between rich and poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–115). New York: Russell Sage.
Robinson, N., Lanzi, R., Weinberg, R., Ramey, S. & Ramey, C. (2002). Familiy factors associated with high academic competence in former Head Start children at third grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 281–294.
Siraj-Blatchford, I. & Nah, K.-O. (2014). A comparison of the pedagogical practices of mathematics education for young children in English and South Korea. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 145–165.
Stebbins, M. & McIntosh, D. (1996). Decision-making utility of the Bracken Basic Concept Scale in identifying at-risk preschoolers. School Psychology International, 17(3), 293–303.
Stein, M., Silbert, J. & Carnine, D. (1997). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (2005). Head Start Impact Study: First year findings. Washington, DC.
Vermunt, J. K. & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. J. & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities and achievement. Chicago: Riverside Publishing.
Yang, X., Shaftel, J., Glasnapp, D. & Poggio, J. (2005). Qualitative or quantitative differences? Latent class analysis of mathematical ability for special education students. The Journal of Special Education, 38(4), 194–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Q., Lei, Pw., DiPerna, J.C. et al. Identifying Differences in Early Mathematical Skills Among Children in Head Start. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 1403–1423 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9552-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9552-y