Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors and association with severity of keratoconus: the Australian study of Keratoconus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significance

Our results show that asthmatic patients tend to have more severe KC and thus close monitoring for disease progression would be advised, and appropriate treatment strategies may be actioned stabilise the condition that may reduce the need for future corneal transplantation.

Purpose

To explore a wide range of risk factors associated with the severity of keratoconus (KC).

Methods

A cross-sectional study of KC patients was undertaken in Melbourne, Australia. A questionnaire addressing age, gender, educational background, ocular and medical history, smoking and alcohol consumption, and physical examination comprising anthropometric measurements was collected; eye examination was undertaken. The associations between a range of risk factors and the severity of KC were determined using univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses.

Results

A total of 260 KC subjects were included in this study. Mean age of subject was 35.5 (SD = 14.8) years and the majority of the subjects were European 171 (68.2%). Initial univariate regression analysis identified the following risk factors at the p < 0.1 level with KC: higher body mass index, smoking cigarettes, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and asthma were associated with increased severity of KC, whereas eczema was associated with less severe KC. Following multivariable regression analysis, only asthma remained as a significant risk factor associated with 2.2 diopters (D) steeper average mean keratometry compared to KC subjects having no asthma [p = 0.03; β = 2.18; 95% confidence intervals: 1.22, 4.14].

Conclusion

Our study describes the comprehensive assessment of all the known risk factors in a large KC cohort recruited in Australia. Our study has reported asthma as the only risk factor found to be significantly associated with the severity of KC. The results of this study allow us to better understand the aetiology of KC and such knowledge could be useful in instigate systemic management of patients to slow or prevent KC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rabinowitz YS (1998) Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 42:297–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Godefrooij DA, Mangen MJ, Chan E et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. Ophthalmology 124:1485–1495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams KA, Lowe M, Bartlett C et al (2008) Risk factors for human corneal graft failure within the Australian corneal graft registry. Transplantation 86:1720–1724

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ et al (2014) The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 28:189–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Balasubramanian SA, Pye DC, Willcox MD (2013) Effects of eye rubbing on the levels of protease, protease activity and cytokines in tears: relevance in keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 96:214–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galvis V, Tello A, Carreno NI et al (2017) Risk factors for keratoconus: atopy and eye rubbing. Cornea 36:e1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barr JT, Wilson BS, Gordon MO et al (2006) Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study. Cornea 25:16–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Szczotka LB, Barr JT, Zadnik K (2001) A summary of the findings from the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study. CLEK Study Group Optom 72:574–584

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner H, Barr JT, Zadnik K (2007) Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 30:223–232

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB et al (1998) Baseline findings in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2537–2546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB et al (2000) Corneal scarring and vision in keratoconus: a baseline report from the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study. Cornea 19:804–812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zadnik K, Barr JT, Gordon MO et al (1996) Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study group. Cornea 15:139–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weed KH, Macewen CJ, Giles T et al (2008) The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus study: demographics, corneal signs, associated diseases, and eye rubbing. Eye (Lond) 22:534–541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Agrawal VB (2011) Characteristics of keratoconus patients at a tertiary eye center in India. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 6:87–91

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Woodward MA, Blachley TS, Stein JD (2016) The association between sociodemographic factors, common systemic diseases, and keratoconus: an analysis of a nationwide heath care claims database. Ophthalmology 123(457–465):e452

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison RJ, Klouda PT, Easty DL et al (1989) Association between keratoconus and atopy. Br J Ophthalmol 73:816–822

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Khor WB, Wei RH, Lim L et al (2011) Keratoconus in Asians: demographics, clinical characteristics and visual function in a hospital-based population. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 39:299–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nemet AY, Vinker S, Bahar I et al (2010) The association of keratoconus with immune disorders. Cornea 29:1261–1264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Owens H, Gamble G (2003) A profile of keratoconus in New Zealand. Cornea 22:122–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Burdon KP, Coster DJ, Charlesworth JC et al (2008) Apparent autosomal dominant keratoconus in a large Australian pedigree accounted for by digenic inheritance of two novel loci. Hum Genet 124:379–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burdon KP, Macgregor S, Bykhovskaya Y et al (2011) Association of polymorphisms in the hepatocyte growth factor gene promoter with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:8514–8519

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bykhovskaya Y, Li X, Epifantseva I et al (2012) Variation in the lysyl oxidase (LOX) gene is associated with keratoconus in family-based and case-control studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4152–4157

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Tang YG et al (2006) Two-stage genome-wide linkage scan in keratoconus sib pair families. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:3791–3795

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu Y, Vitart V, Burdon KP et al (2013) Genome-wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nat Genet 45:155–163

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shneor E, Millodot M, Blumberg S et al (2013) Characteristics of 244 patients with keratoconus seen in an optometric contact lens practice. Clin Exp Optom 96:219–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sahebjada S, Fenwick EK, Xie J et al (2014) Impact of keratoconus in the better eye and the worse eye on vision-related quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:412–416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sahebjada S, Schache M, Richardson AJ et al (2014) Association of the hepatocyte growth factor gene with keratoconus in an Australian population. Plos One 9:e84067

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sahebjada S, Schache M, Richardson AJ et al (2013) Evaluating the association between keratoconus and the corneal thickness genes in an independent Australian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:8224–8228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sabiston DW (1966) The association of keratoconus, dermatitis and asthma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc New Zealand 18:66–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Merdler I, Hassidim A, Sorkin N et al (2015) Keratoconus and allergic diseases among Israeli adolescents between 2005 and 2013. Cornea 34:525–529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bak-Nielsen S, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Ivarsen A et al (2018) A nationwide population-based study of social demographic factors, associated diseases and mortality of keratoconus patients in Denmark from 1977 to 2015. Acta Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. To T, Stanojevic S, Moores G et al (2012) Global asthma prevalence in adults: findings from the cross-sectional world health survey. BMC Pub Health 12:204

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cookson WO, Moffatt MF (2000) Genetics of asthma and allergic disease. Hum Mol Genet 9:2359–2364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ellwood P, Asher MI, Billo NE et al (2017) The global asthma network rationale and methods for phase i global surveillance: prevalence, severity, management and risk factors. Eur Respir J. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01605-2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sabti S, Tappeiner C, Frueh BE (2015) Corneal cross-linking in a 4-year-old child with keratoconus and down syndrome. Cornea 34:1157–1160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kankariya VP, Kymionis GD, Diakonis VF et al (2013) Management of pediatric keratoconus - evolving role of corneal collagen cross-linking: an update. Indian J Ophthalmol 61:435–440

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferreira MA, Matheson MC, Duffy DL et al (2011) Identification of IL6R and chromosome 11q13.5 as risk loci for asthma. Lancet 378:1006–1014

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M et al (2009) STRING 8–a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D412-416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shetty R, Sharma A, Pahuja N et al (2017) Oxidative stress induces dysregulated autophagy in corneal epithelium of keratoconus patients. Plos One 12:e0184628

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li YR, Li J, Zhao SD et al (2015) Meta-analysis of shared genetic architecture across ten pediatric autoimmune diseases. Nat Med 21:1018–1027

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. An-Nakhli FR (2015) Association between diabetes and keratoconus: a case-control study. Cornea 34:e10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Knox Cartwright NE, Tole DM (2011) Diabetes and keratoconus. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kosker M, Rapuano CJ (2015) Association between diabetes and keratoconus: a case-control study. Cornea 34:e17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kosker M, Suri K, Hammersmith KM et al (2014) Another look at the association between diabetes and keratoconus. Cornea 33:774–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuo IC, Broman A, Pirouzmanesh A et al (2006) Is there an association between diabetes and keratoconus? Ophthalmology 113:184–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Naderan M, Naderan M, Rezagholizadeh F et al (2014) Association between diabetes and keratoconus: a case-control study. Cornea 33:1271–1273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Prakash G, Sharma N, Titiyal JS (2007) Association between diabetes and keratoconus? Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seiler T, Huhle S, Spoerl E et al (2000) Manifest diabetes and keratoconus: a retrospective case-control study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:822–825

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Gerber Y et al (2009) Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:715–719

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R et al (2007) Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3026–3031

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Touboul D, Roberts C, Kerautret J et al (2008) Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:616–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Greene PR, Medina A (2016) The progression of nearwork myopia. Optom Open Access. https://doi.org/10.4172/2476-2075.1000120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank participants from the Keratoconus study who made this work possible. The authors would also like to thank the Eye surgery associates, Lindsay and associates and Keratoconus Australia, Mr Tony Ngo for their assistance with recruitment. A preliminary report on some of these data was presented at the Asia cornea society meeting, Taipei, Taiwan, Dec, 2014.

Funding

This study was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project ideas grant APP1187763 and senior research fellowship (1138585 to PNB), Lions Eye Donation Service (SS), Angior Family Foundation (SS) and Perpetual Impact Philanthropy grant (SS). The Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) receives operational infrastructure support from the Victorian government. The sponsor or funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srujana Sahebjada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Royal victorian eye and ear hospital human research and ethics committee (Project # 10/954H) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahebjada, S., Chan, E., Xie, J. et al. Risk factors and association with severity of keratoconus: the Australian study of Keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 41, 891–899 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01644-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01644-6

Keywords

Navigation