Abstract
Introduction
The Brazilian Atlantic Forest (BAF) is undergoing alarming deforestation, land overexploitation, and unregulated occupation. The Coastal Sandy Vegetation of BAF, known as Restinga, is under the most pressure of the BAF ecosystems. Understanding the effects of Restinga deforestation on biodiversity is a conservation priority.
Aims/Methods
We predicted the effect of landscape modifications on the large-scale spatial distribution of an endangered dung beetle (Dichotomius schiffleri) endemic to the BAF Restinga ecosystem. We tested the hypothesis that almost all the potential distribution area of this species has suffered from landscape modification, and reduced its spatial distribution. We used niche-based modeling approaches to predict the potential species distribution (climate-based models) and the species distribution under the current land-use scenario (landscape-based models). We then combined these models to predict the effects of landscape modification.
Results
The spatial distribution of D. schiffleri has decreased drastically as a consequence of landscape modification. The decreasing patch size, canopy cover percentage, and functional connectivity, and the increasing edge distance explain the decrease in the potential species distribution as predicted by climate variables.
Discussion
Suitable sites for this species are isolated in a vast matrix of pasture, tree plantations, and urban areas. D. schiffleri is sensitive to anthropogenic changes such as disturbances of preserved Restinga areas. Therefore, human coastal-plain land uses over the past five centuries pose multiple synergistic threats to the persistence of this species.
Implications for insect conservation
Our findings suggest an alarming trend toward species extinction in the near future, highlighting the need for specific conservation actions to protect Restinga biodiversity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albeny-Simões D, da Silva PG, Breaux JA, Hernández MIM (2019) Inside-container effects drive mosquito community structure in Brazilian Atlantic forest. Entomol Exp Appl 167:566–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12803
Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232
Amaral ACZ, Corte GN, Rosa-Filho JR et al (2016) Brazilian sandy beaches: characteristics, ecosystem services, impacts, knowledge and priorities. Braz J Oceanogr 64:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-875920160933064sp2
Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010
Araujo MB, Anderson RP, Barbosa AM et al (2019) Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessment. Sci Adv 5:4858. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4858
Audino LD, Louzada J, Comita LS (2014) Dung beetles as indicators of tropical forest restoration success: Is it possible to recover species and functional diversity? Biol Conserv 169:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.023
Audino LD, Murphy SJ, Zambaldi L, Louzada J, Comita LS (2017) Drivers of community assembly in tropical forest restoration sites: role of local environment, landscape, and space. Ecol Appl 27:1731–1745. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1562
Barbosa FAR, Scarano FR, Sabará MG, Esteves FA (2004) Brazilian LTER: ecosystem and biodiversity information in support of decision-making. Environ Monit Assess 90:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000003571.10570.02
Barlow J, Lennox G, Ferreira J et al (2016) Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535:144–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18326
Barry S, Elith J (2006) Error and uncertainty in habitat models. J Appl Ecol 43:413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01136.x
Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A et al (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Model 222:1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
Batilani-Filho M, Hernandez MIM (2017) Decline of ecological functions performed by dung beetles in areas of Atlantic Forest and contribution of rollers and tunnellers in organic matter removal. Environ Entomol 46:784–793. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvx091
Bechara FC, Reis A, Trentin BE (2014) Invasão biológica de Pinus elliottii var. elliottii no Parque Estadual do Rio Vermelho. Florianópolis SC Rev Floresta 44:63–72. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v44i1.32013
Beiroz W, Barlow J, Slade E, Borges C, Louzada J, Sayer EJ (2019a) Biodiversity in tropical plantations is influenced by surrounding native vegetation but not yield: A case study with dung beetles in Amazonia. Forest Ecol Manag 444:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.04.036
Beiroz W, Vieira L, Louzada J (2019b) Ecological similarity promotes coexistence between taxonomically related dung beetles species. Acta Oecol 96:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2019.03.002
Briggs JC (2017) Emergence of a sixth mass extinction? Biol J Linn Soc 122:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blx063
Brown KS, Freitas AV (2000) Atlantic Forest butterflies: indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32:934–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00631.x
Cabanne GS, Santos FR, Miyaki CY (2007) Phylogeography of Xiphorhynchus fuscus (Passeriformes, Dendrocolaptidae): vicariance and recent demographic expansion in southern Atlantic forest. Biol J Linn Soc 91:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00775.x
Campos RC, Hernández M, Medina I (2013) Dung beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae) in Atlantic forest fragments in southern Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 57:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013000100008
Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV, New TR (2011) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv 144:2647–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.024
Carnaval AC, Moritz C (2008) Historical climate modelling predicts patterns of current biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. J Biogeogr 35:1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01870.x
Carpenter G, Gillison NA, Winter J (1993) DOMAIN: a flexible modeling procedure for mapping potential distributions of animals and plants. Biodivers Conserv 2:667–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051966
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD et al (2015) Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Chefaoui RM, Hortal J, Lobo JM (2005) Potential distribution modeling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: a case study of Iberian Copris species. Biol Conserv 122:327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.08.005
Costa C, Oliveira VHF, Maciel R et al (2017) Variegated tropical landscapes conserve diverse dung beetle communities. PeerJ 5:e3125. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3125
Culot L, Bovy E, Vaz-de-Mello FZ et al (2013) Selective defaunation affects dung beetle communities in continuous Atlantic rainforest. Biol Conserv 163:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.004
Davis ALV (1997) Climatic and biogeographical associations of southern African dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae s. str.). Afr J Ecol 35:10–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1997.051-89051.x
De Marco P, Júnior NCC (2018) Evaluating collinearity effects on species distribution models: An approach based on virtual species simulation. PLoS ONE 13(9):e0202403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202403
Dean W (1996) A ferro e fogo: a História e a devastação da Mata Atlântica Brasileira. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo
Díaz A, Galante E, Favila ME (2010) The effect of the landscape matrix on the distribution of dung and carrion beetles in a fragmented tropical rain forest. J Insect Science. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.8101
Didham RK, Kapos V, Ewers RM (2012) Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research. Oikos 121:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20273.x
Dirzo R, Young HS, Galleti M et al (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251817
Eisenhauer N, Bonn A, Guerra CA (2019) Recognizing the quiet extinction of invertebrates. Nat Commun 10:150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07916-1
Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R, Dadda A, Cammarano P (1998) Dung and carrion beetles in tropical rain forest fragments and agricultural habitats at Los Tuxtlas. Mexico J Trop Ecol 14:577–593
Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
Farber O, Kadmon R (2003) Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance. Ecol Modell 160:115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00327-7
Filgueiras BKC, Iannuzzi L, Leal IR (2011) Habitat fragmentation alters the structure of dung beetle communities in the Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv 144:362–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.013
Flexor JM, Martin L, Suguio K et al (1984) Gênese dos cordões litorâneos na parte central da costa brasileira. In: Lacerda LD, Araújo DSD, Cerqueira R, Turcq B (eds) Restingas: origem, estrutura, processos. CEUFF, Rio de Janeiro, pp 35–46
França F, Louzada J, Korasaki V et al (2016) Do space-for-time assessments underestimate the impacts of logging on tropical biodiversity? An Amazonian case study using dung beetles. J Appl Ecol 53:1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12657
França F, Louzada J, Barlow J (2018) Selective logging effects on “brown world” faecal-detritus pathway in tropical forests: A case study from Amazonia using dung beetles. For Ecol Manag 410:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.027
Francisquini MI, Lorente FL, Pessenda LCR et al (2020) Cold and humid Atlantic Rainforest during the last glacial maximum, northern Espírito Santo state, southeastern Brazil. Quat Sci Rev 244:106489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106489
Franklin J (2009) Mapping species distributions: Spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University, Cambridge
Gazziotin FG, Monzel M, Echeverrigarauy S et al (2006) Phylogeography of the Bothrops jararaca complex (Serpentes: Viperidae): past fragmentation and island colonization in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mol Ecol 15:3969–3982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03057.x
Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186
Guisan A, Rahbek C (2011) SESAM — a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio-temporal patterns of species assemblages. J Biogeogr 38:1433–1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02550.x
Guisan A, Mod HK, Scherrer D et al (2019) Scaling the linkage between environmental niches and functional traits for improved spatial predictions of biological communities. Global Ecol Biogeogr 28:1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12967
Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J et al (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
Hanski I (2015) Habitat fragmentation and species richness. J Biogeogr 42:989–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12478
Hasui E, Silva VX, Cunha RGT et al (2017) Additions of landscape metrics improve predictions of occurrence of species distribution models. J for Res 28:963–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0388-5
Hernández MIM, Barreto PSCS, Costa VH et al (2014) Response of a dung beetle assemblage along a reforestation gradient in Restinga forest. J Ins Cons 18:539–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9645-5
Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J et al (2020) DISMO: Species Distribution Modeling. R package version 1.1–1. Available in https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo
IBGE (2020) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro
ICMBio (2018) Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção: Volume I. Brasília, DF: ICMBio/MMA, 492 p.
Joly C, Metzger JP, Tabarelli M (2014) Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: ecological findings and conservation initiatives. New Phytol 204:459–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12989
Karatzoglou A, Smola A, Hornik K et al (2004) KERNLAB – An S4 package for kernel methods in R. J Stat Soft 11: 1–20. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v011/i09
Kohlmann B, Solís A, Elle O et al (2007) Biodiversity, conservation, and hotspot atlas of Costa Rica a dung beetle perspective (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Zootaxa 1457:1–34. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1457.1.1
Laurence WF (2007) Have we overstated the tropical biodiversity crisis? Trends Ecol Evol 22:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.014
Lembi RC, Cronemberger C, Picharillo C et al (2020) Urban expansion in the Atlantic Forest: applying the nature futures framework to develop a conceptual model and future scenarios. Biota Neotrop 20:e20190904. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2019-0904
Leroux S, Albert CH, Lafuite A-S et al (2017) Structural uncertainty in models projecting the consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation on biodiversity. Ecography 40:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02542
Liu C, Newell G, White M (2016) On the selection of thresholds for predicting species occurrence with presence-only data. Ecol Evol 6:337–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1878
Lobo JM, Davis ALV (1999) An intercontinental comparison of dung beetle diversity between two Mediterranean-climatic regions: local versus regional and historical influences. Divers Distrib 5:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00039.x
Lobo JM, Martín-Piera F (2002) Searching for a predictive model for species richness of Iberian dung beetle based on spatial and environmental variables. Conserv Biol 16:158–173. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00211.x
Lobo JM, Lumaret JP, Jay-Robert P (2001) Diversity, distinctiveness and conservation status of the Mediterranean coastal dung beetle assemblage in the Regional Natural Park of the Camargue (France). Divers Distrib 7:257–270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1366-9516.2001.00122.x
Louzada J, Schiffler G, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (1996) Efeitos do fogo sobre a estrutura da comunidade de Scarabaeidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) na restinga da Ilha de Guriri – ES. In: Miranda HS, Saito CH, Dias BFS (eds) Anais do Simpósio de Impacto das queimadas sobre os ecossistemas e mudanças globais. 3o Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil, UNB, Brasília, pp 161–169
Maioli V, Monteiro LM, Tubenchlak F et al (2021) Local Perception in Forest Landscape Restoration planning: a case study from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Front Ecol Evol 9:612789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.612789
Marques MCM, Silva SM, Liebsch D (2015) Coastal plain forests in southern and southeastern Brazil: ecological drivers, floristic patterns and conservation status. Braz J Bot 38:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-015-0132-3
Marsh CJ, Feitosa RM, Louzada J et al (2018) Is β-diversity of Amazonian ant and dung beetles communities elevated at rainforest edges? J Biogeogr 45:1966–1979. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13357
Martello F, Andriolli F, de Souza TB et al (2016) Edge and land use effects on dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Brazilian cerrado vegetation. J Insect Conserv 20:957–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9928-0
Martín-Piera F (2001) Area networks for conserving Iberian insects: a case study of dung beetles (Col., Scarabaeoidea). J Insect Conserv 5:233–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013306929014
McDonald RI, Colbert M, Hamann M et al (2018) Nature in the urban century. The Nature Conservancy, Washington, DC
Morellato LPC, Haddad CFB (2000) Introduction: The Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 32:786–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00618.x
Moritz C, Patton JL, Schneider CJ et al (2000) Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:533–563. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.533
Morrone JJ (2014) Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa 3782:1–110. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding – a global assessment. PLoS ONE 10:e0118571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118571
Nix H (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elapid snakes. In: Longmore R (ed) Snakes: Atlas of Elapid snakes of Australia. Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra, pp 4–10
Pardini R, Faria D, Accacio GM et al (2009) The challenge of maintaining Atlantic forest biodiversity: A multi-taxa conservation assessment of specialist and generalist species in an agro-forestry mosaic in southern Bahia. Biol Conserv 142:1178–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.010
Pardini R, Bueno ADA, Gardner TA et al (2010) Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: Regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. PLoS ONE 5:e13666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013666
Patterson M, Hardy D (2008) Economic Drivers of Change and their Oceanic-Coastal Ecological Impacts. In: Patterson M, Glavovic BC (eds) Ecological economics of the oceans and coasts. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 187–209
Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
Pellegrino KCM, Rodrigues MI, Waite NA et al (2005) Phylogeography and species limits in the Gymnodactylus darwinii complex (Gekkonidae, Squamata): genetic structure coincides with river systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol J Linn Soc 85:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00472.x
Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG et al (2011) Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x
Püttker T, Crouzeilles R, Almeida-Gomes M et al (2020) Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: a cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species. Biol Conserv 241:108368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108368
Reinert F, Roberts A, Wilson JM et al (1997) Gradation in nutrient composition and photosynthetic pathways across the restinga vegetation of Brazil. Bot Acta 110:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1997.tb00620.x
Rezende CL, Scarano FR, Assad ED et al (2018) From hotspot to hopespot: an opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.10.002
Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC et al (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
Rocha CFD, Van Sluys M, Bergallo HG et al (2005) Endemic and threatened tetrapods in the restingas of the biodiversity corridors of Serra do Mar and of the Central da Mata Atlântica in eastern Brazil. Braz J Biol 65:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842005000100019
Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG, Van Sluys M et al (2007) The remnants of restinga habitats in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil: habitat loss and risk of disappearance. Braz J Biol 6:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842007000200011
Salomão RP, Brito LC, Iannuzzi L et al (2019) Effects of environmental parameters on beetle assemblage in a fragmented tropical rainforest of South America. J Insect Conserv 23:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-00120-y
Santos JP, Sobral-Souza T, Brown KS Jr et al (2020) Effects of landscape modification on species richness patterns of fruit-feeding butterflies in Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Divers Distrib 26:196–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13007
Scarano FS (2002) Structure, function and floristic relationships of plant communities in stressful habitats marginal to the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Ann Bot 90:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/2Faob/2Fmcf189
Silva DP, Aguiar AG, Simião-Ferreira J (2016) Assessing the distribution and conservation status of a long-horned beetle with species distribution models. J Insect Conserv 20:611–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9892-8
Silva PG, Hernández MIM (2016) Spatial variation of dung beetle assemblages associated with forest structure in remnants of southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Rev Bras Entomol 60:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2015.11.001
Soberón J, Nakamura M (2009) Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19644–19650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901637106
Sobral-Souza T, Stropp J, Santos JP et al (2021a) Knowledge gaps hamper understanding the relationship between fragmentation and biodiversity loss: the case of Atlantic Forest fruit-feeding butterflies. PeerJ 9:e11673. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11673
Sobral-Souza T, Santos JP, Maldaner ME et al (2021b) EcoLand: A multiscale niche modelling framework to improve predictions on biodiversity and conservation. Perspect Ecol Conserv 19:362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.03.008
Tabarelli M, Aguiar AV, Ribeiro MC et al (2010) Prospects for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest: lessons from aging human-modified landscapes. Biol Conserv 143:2328–2340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.005
Tavares A, Beiroz W, Fialho A et al (2019) Eucalyptus plantations as hybrid ecosystems: implications for species conservation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. For Ecol Manag 433:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.063
Tax DMJ, Duin RPW (2004) Support vector data description. Mach Learn 54:45–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MACH.0000008084.60811.49
Teixeira MC, Schoereder JH, Louzada J (2004) Occurrence of Atta robusta Borgmeier (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the North of Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 33:265–266. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2004000200019
Teixido AL, Gonçalves SRA, Fernández-Arellano GJ (2020) Major biases and knowledge gaps on fragmentation research in Brazil: Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 251:108749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108749
Thomé MTC, Zamudio KR, Haddad CFB et al (2014) Barriers, rather than refugia, underlie the origin of diversity in toads endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mol Ecol 23:6152–6164. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12986
Uehara-Prado M, Fernandes JO, Bello AM (2009) Selecting terrestrial arthropods as indicators of small-scale disturbance: A first approach in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv 142:1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.008
Van Rensburg BJ, McGeoch MA, Chown SL et al (1999) Conservation of heterogeneity among dung beetles in the Maputaland Centre of Endemism, South Africa. Biol Conserv 88:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00109-8
Vanzolini PE, Williams EE (1981) The vanishing refuge: a mechanism for ecogeographic speciation. Pap Avulsos Zool 34:251–255
Vaz S, Manes S, Gama-Maia D et al (2021) Light pollution is the fastest growing potential threat to firefly conservation in the Atlantic Forest hotspot. Insect Conserv Divers 14:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12481
Vaz-de-Mello F, Larsen T, Silva F et al (2020) Dichotomius schiffleri (amended version of 2013 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T137111A176235411.en
Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Louzada J, Gavino M (2001) Nova espécie de Dichotomius Hope, 1838 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) do Espírito Santo, Brasil. Rev Bras Entomol 45:99–102
Vieira L, Louzada J, Spector S (2008) Effects of degradation and replacement of Southern Brazilian coastal sandy vegetation on dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biotropica 40:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00432.x
Vieira L, Louzada J, Vaz-de-Mello FZ et al (2011) New records, threatens and conservation status for Dichotomius schiffleri Vaz-de-Mello, Louzada & Gavino (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): an endangered dung beetle species from Brazilian atlantic forest ecosystems. Neotrop Entomol 40:282–284. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2011000200020
Wilson MC, Chen XY, Corlett RT et al (2016) Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges. Landsc Ecol 31:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0312-3
Zeppelini D, Bellini BC, Creão-Duarte AJ et al (2009) Collembola as bioindicators of restoration in mined sand dunes of Northeastern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 18:1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9505-2
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the support of a PDEE/CAPES fellowship (process 4491068) for L.V. staff at the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation/AMNH, L. Weinberg and B. Weinberg, and L. Nichols for logistical support, P. Ersts and K. Koy for GIS help, R. Pearson for discussions of distribution modeling, The Scarabaeinae Research Network, and T. Gardner, F. Escobar, and C. Ribas for their critical reviews. We thank M.H. Vancini for support with R scripts and M.C. Ribeiro for logistical support for the modeling execution. Finally, we are thankful to the two anonymous reviewers for improving our manuscript.
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vieira, L., Sobral-Souza, T., Spector, S. et al. Synergistic effects of climate and human-induced landscape changes on the spatial distribution of an endangered dung beetle. J Insect Conserv 26, 315–326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00388-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00388-1