Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Microstructure and strength development of quaternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete

  • Ceramics
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates low cement quaternary blend HVFA concrete mixes utilizing up to 80% cement replacement using fly ash, hydrated lime and nano-silica. The optimized concrete mixes achieved a compressive strength of 55 MPa and 48 MPa, for HVFA-65 and HVFA-80 concretes, respectively. Additional fly ash and hydrated lime dosage in HVFA concrete increased the rate of hydration of the C3A and C4AF phases but decreased the hydration of the C3S phase. This resulted in lower early age strength development in the HVFA concrete than occurs in PC concrete but significantly higher than for fly ash and hydrated lime alone. The addition of the nano-silica resulted in an increase in C–S–H gel incorporation of tetrahedrally coordinated aluminium (AlIV) into the HVFA concrete and the substitution of Si by Al in the C–S–H gel, leading to an increase in compressive strength in the HVFA concrete. Early age carbonation was increased with a higher of fly ash percentage. However, the reaction products dissolved in the pore water to form calcium bicarbonate with time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CEMBUREAU (2010) World statistical review 1996–2008 cement production, in trade, consumption data. The European Cement Association, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. CEMBUREAU (2016) Activity report 2015, Brussels. http://www.cembureau.be/sites/default/files/AR2015.pdf

  3. FAO (2013) Food wastage footprint impacts on natural resources: summary report. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacKenzie KJ, Smith ME (2002) Multinuclear solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance of inorganic materials, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. WBCSD (2016) Cement sustainability initiative, getting the numbers right, project emissions report 2014. http://www.gnr-project.org/

  6. Boden T, Marland G (2016) Global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751–2013. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/global.1751_2013.ems

  7. IEA W (2009) Cement technology road-map 2009 carbon emissions reductions up to 2050. OECD/IEA: WBCSD, Paris. Conches-Geneva, Switzerland. http://wbcsdcement.org/pdf/technology/WBCSD-IEA_Cement%20Roadmap.pdf

  8. Park JH et al (2014) The application of coal combustion by-products in mine site rehabilitation. J Clean Prod 84:761–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khodr M et al (2019) Compressive strength and microstructure evolution of low calcium brown coal fly ash-based geopolymer. J Sustain Cem Based Mater 9(1):17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2019.1666061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunasekara CM (2016) Influence of properties of fly ash from different sources on the mix design and performance of geopolymer concrete. RMIT University Melbourne, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khale D, Chaudhary R (2007) Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review. J Mater Sci 42(3):729–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rakhimova N, Rakhimov R (2014) A review on alkali-activated slag cements incorporated with supplementary materials. J Sustain Cem Based Mater 3(1):61–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sagoe-Crentsil K, Brown T, Taylor A (2013) Drying shrinkage and creep performance of geopolymer concrete. J Sustain Cem Based Mater 2(1):35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandanayake M et al (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions of different fly ash based geopolymer concretes in building construction. J Clean Prod 204:399–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gunasekera C, Setunge S, Law DW (2017) Correlations between mechanical properties of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concretes. J Mater Civ Eng 29(9):04017111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malhotra VM, Mehta PK (2002) Development, high-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete: materials, mixture proportioning, properties, construction practice, and case histories. Supplementary Cementing Materials for Sustainable Development

  17. Shaikh F, Supit S, Sarker P (2014) A study on the effect of nano silica on compressive strength of high volume fly ash mortars and concretes. Mater Des 60:433–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li H et al (2004) Microstructure of cement mortar with nano-particles. Compos B Eng 35(2):185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rudolph W, Brooker MH, Tremaine PR (1997) Raman spectroscopic investigation of aqueous FeSO4 in neutral and acidic solutions from 25‡ C to 303‡ C: inner-and outer-sphere complexes. J Solut Chem 26(8):757–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Supit SWM, Shaikh FUA (2015) Durability properties of high volume fly ash concrete containing nano-silica. Mater Struct 48(8):2431–2445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Korpa A, Kowald T, Trettin R (2008) Hydration behaviour, structure and morphology of hydration phases in advanced cement-based systems containing micro and nanoscale pozzolanic additives. Cem Concr Res 38(7):955–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong D, Ye Q, Ni T (2010) Effect of silica sol on rheological behavior of the cement paste. Rare Metal Mater Eng 39(S2):12–115

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kirby GH, Lewis JA (2004) Comb polymer architecture effects on the rheological property evolution of concentrated cement suspensions. J Am Ceram Soc 87(9):1643–1652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. ASTM (2016) Standard specification for Portland cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  25. AS (1998) Supplementary cementitious materials for use with portland and blended cement, part 1: fly ash, in AS (Australian Standards). Standards Australia, Melbourne, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  26. AS (2000) Methods for sampling and testing aggregates, method 5: particle density and water absorption of fine aggregate, in AS (Australian Standards). Standards Australia, Melbourne, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gunasekara C, Setunge DWLS (2018) Design of ternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete mixes using hydrated Lime. In: Sixth international conference on the durability of concrete structures. University of Leeds, Leeds

  28. Neville AM (1996) Properties of concrete. Fourth and Final Edition ed. Standards updated to 2002. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hielscher T (2007) Ultrasonic production of nano-size dispersions and emulsions. arXiv preprint arXiv:0708.1831

  30. AS (1999) Method of testing concrete, method 9: determination of the compressive strength of concrete specimens, in AS (Australian Standards). Standards Australia, Melbourne, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jawed I, Skalny J (1978) Alkalies in cement: a review: II. Effects of alkalies on hydration and performance of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 8(1):37–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lagier F, Kurtis KE (2007) Influence of Portland cement composition on early age reactions with metakaolin. Cem Concr Res 37(10):1411–1417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete, 5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, England

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hemalatha T, Sasmal S (2017) Early-age strength development in fly ash blended cement composites: investigation through chemical activation. Mag Concr Res 71(5):260–270. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.17.00336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu Q et al (2010) Isothermal calorimetry tests and modeling of cement hydration parameters. Thermochim Acta 499(1–2):91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sofi M et al (2017) From hydration to strength properties of fly ash based mortar. J Mater Sci Chem Eng 5(12):63–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bentz DP (2010) Powder additions to mitigate retardation in high-volume fly ash mixtures. ACI Mater J 107(5):508–514

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bentz DP, Ferraris CF (2010) Rheology and setting of high volume fly ash mixtures. Cem Concr Res 32(4):265–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Deboucha W et al (2017) Hydration development of mineral additives blended cement using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA): methodology of calculating the degree of hydration. Constr Build Mater 146:687–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhatty J (1986) Hydration versus strength in a portland cement developed from domestic mineral wastes—a comparative study. Thermochim Acta 106(15):93–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Larsen G (1961) Microscopic point measuring: a quantitative petrographic method of determining the Ca(OH)2 content of the cement paste of concrete. Mag Concr Res 13(38):71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Belkowitz JS (2009) An investigation of nano silica in the cement hydration process. Thesis, University of DenverProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search-proquestcom.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/openview/a0b7bae8634bc3f3577b03c20d23ab5f/1.pdf?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

  43. Park S-M et al (2016) An NMR spectroscopic investigation of aluminosilicate gel in alkali-activated fly ash in a CO2-rich environment. Materials 9(5):308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Andersen MD, Jakobsen HJ, Skibsted J (2004) Characterization of white Portland cement hydration and the C–S–H structure in the presence of sodium aluminate by 27Al and 29Si MAS NMR spectroscopy. Cem Concr Res 34(5):857–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Love CA, Richardson IG, Brough AR (2007) Composition and structure of C–S–H in white Portland cement—20% metakaolin pastes hydrated at 25 °C. Cem Concr Res 37(2):109–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A, Criado M (2005) Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: a descriptive model. Cem Concr Res 35(6):1204–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Steveson M, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2005) Relationships between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers. J Mater Sci 40(16):4247–4259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1226-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to acknowledge Boral limited, Flyash Australia Pty Ltd and Independent Cement & Lime Pty Ltd for the supply of materials. The X-ray facility and Microscopy & Microanalysis facility provided by RMIT University and the Calorimetry tests conducted in Melbourne University is also acknowledged. This research was conducted by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Research Hub for nanoscience-based construction material manufacturing (IH150100006) and funded by the Australian Government. The financial supports from the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Early Career Researcher Grant (DE170100165, DE 2017 R1), Australian Postgraduate Award and The University of Melbourne are also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia

    Chamila Gunasekara, David W. Law & Sujeeva Setunge

  2. Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Zhiyuan Zhou, Massoud Sofi & Priyan Mendis

Authors
  1. Chamila Gunasekara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiyuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David W. Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Massoud Sofi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sujeeva Setunge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Priyan Mendis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chamila Gunasekara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gunasekara, C., Zhou, Z., Law, D.W. et al. Microstructure and strength development of quaternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete. J Mater Sci 55, 6441–6456 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04473-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04473-1

Search

Navigation