Skip to main content
Log in

Model-free model elimination: A new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Model-free analysis is a technique commonly used within the field of NMR spectroscopy to extract atomic resolution, interpretable dynamic information on multiple timescales from the R 1, R 2, and steady state NOE. Model-free approaches employ two disparate areas of data analysis, the discipline of mathematical optimisation, specifically the minimisation of a χ2 function, and the statistical field of model selection. By searching through a large number of model-free minimisations, which were setup using synthetic relaxation data whereby the true underlying dynamics is known, certain model-free models have been identified to, at times, fail. This has been characterised as either the internal correlation times, τ e , τ f , or τ s , or the global correlation time parameter, local τ m , heading towards infinity, the result being that the final parameter values are far from the true values. In a number of cases the minimised χ2 value of the failed model is significantly lower than that of all other models and, hence, will be the model which is chosen by model selection techniques. If these models are not removed prior to model selection the final model-free results could be far from the truth. By implementing a series of empirical rules involving inequalities these models can be specifically isolated and removed. Model-free analysis should therefore consist of three distinct steps: model-free minimisation, model-free model elimination, and finally model-free model selection. Failure has also been identified to affect the individual Monte Carlo simulations used within error analysis. Each simulation involves an independent randomised relaxation data set and model-free minimisation, thus simulations suffer from exactly the same types of failure as model-free models. Therefore, to prevent these outliers from causing a significant overestimation of the errors the failed Monte Carlo simulations need to be culled prior to calculating the parameter standard deviations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AIC:

Akaike’s Information Criteria

χ2 :

chi-squared function

c k :

constraint value

CSA:

Chemical Shift Anisotropy

DMG:

Double Motion Grid

ε i :

elimination value

NOE:

nuclear Overhauser effect

r :

bond length

R 1 :

spin-lattice relaxation rate

R 2 :

spin-spin relaxation rate

R ex :

chemical exchange relaxation rate

RG:

R ex Grid

S 2, S 2 f , and S 2 s :

model-free generalised order parameters

τ e , τ f , and τ s :

model-free effective internal correlation times

τ m :

global rotational correlation time.

References

  • Andrec M., Montelione G.T., Levy R.M. (1999). J. Magn. Reson. 139: 408–421

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellomo N., Preziosi L. (1994) Modelling Mathematical Methods and Scientific Computation, CRC Mathematical Modelling Series. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J., Brooks C.L., Wright P.E. (2004). J. Biomol. NMR 29: 243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore G.M., Szabo A., Bax A., Kay L.E., Driscoll P.C., Gronenborn A.M. (1990). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112: 4989–4991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Auvergne E.J., Gooley P.R. (2003). J. Biomol. NMR 25: 25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fushman D., Cahill S., Cowburn D. (1997). J. Mol. Biol. 266: 173–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korzhnev D.M., Billeter M., Arseniev A.S., Orehkov V.Yu. (2001). Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 38: 197–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipari G., Szabo A. (1982a). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104: 4546–4559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipari G., Szabo A. (1982b). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104: 4559–4570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel A.M., Akke M., Palmer A.G. (1995). J. Mol. Biol. 246: 144–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orekhov V.Yu., Korzhnev D.M., Diercks T., Kessler H., Arseniev A.S. (1999). J. Biomol. NMR 14: 345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orekhov V.Yu., Nolde D.E, Golovanov A.P., Korzhnev D.M., Arseniev A.S. (1995). Appl. Magn. Reson. 9: 581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer A.G., Rance M., Wright P.E. (1991). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113: 4371–4380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuravleva A.V., Korzhnev D.M., Kupce E., Arseniev A.S., Billeter M., Orekhov V.Yu. (2004). J. Mol. Biol. 342: 1599–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward J. d’Auvergne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

d’Auvergne, E.J., Gooley, P.R. Model-free model elimination: A new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data. J Biomol NMR 35, 117–135 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-006-9007-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-006-9007-z

Keywords

Navigation