Abstract
To examine how self-regulation and social-regulation surrounding type 1 diabetes (T1D) management are coordinated during early emerging adulthood and whether classes of coordination relate to HbA1c and executive functioning (EF). Emerging adult participants (N = 212) with T1D (M age = 18.8 years, SD = .40) completed a 14-day diary to capture components of self-regulation and social-regulation. A mixture multi-level latent coordination model first determined the separate but coordinated factor structure of self- and social-regulation, then determined the number of distinct classes of coordination and how those classes linked to HbA1c and EF. The best-fitting model included three coordinative factors (self, mother, and father) of regulation and two distinct classes. The class with lower HbA1c and higher EF had more stable self- and social-regulation, more connections between self- and social-regulation and reflected more adaptive patterns, consistent with medical management goals. Social connection with parents may aid in regulation during this at-risk transitional time of emerging adulthood.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Entropy can be used in mixture modeling as an indicator of the difference between classes. With an entropy of .938, we can be reasonably certain that the classes are in fact capturing distinct patterns.
References
American Diabetes Association. (2014). Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 37, S14–S80. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-S014
Berg, C. A., Butner, J. E., Wiebe, D. J., Lansing, A. H., Osborn, P., King, P. S., et al. (2017). Developmental model of parent-child coordination for self-regulation across childhood and into emerging adulthood: Type 1 diabetes management as an example. Developmental Review, 46, 1–26.
Berg, C. A., Queen, T., Butner, J. E., Turner, S. L., Lansing, A. H., Main, A., et al. (2016). Adolescent disclosure to parents and daily management of type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsw056
Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., Suchy, Y., Hughes, A. E., Anderson, J. H., Godbey, E. I., et al. (2014). Individual differences and day-to-day fluctuations in perceived self-regulation associated with daily adherence in late adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 1038–1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu051
Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., Tracy, E. L., Kelly, C. S., Mello, D., Turner, S. L., et al. (2019). Parental involvement and executive function in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 44, 970–979.
Beveridge, R. M., Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., & Palmer, D. L. (2006). Mother and adolescent representations of illness ownership and stressful events surrounding diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 818–827.
Butner, J. E., Berg, C. A., Munion, A. K., Turner, S. L., Hughes-Lansing, A., Winnick, J. B., et al. (2018). Coordination of self- and parental-regulation surrounding type I diabetes management in late adolescence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 29–41.
Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929.
Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System®(D-KEFS®): Examiner’s manual: Flexibility of thinking, concept formation, problem solving, planning, creativity, impluse control, inhibition. London: Pearson.
Duke, D. C., & Harris, M. A. (2014). Executive function, adherence, and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabets: A literature review. Current Diabetes Reports, 14, 532.
Fisher, L., Hessler, D., Polonsky, W. H., Masharani, U., Guzman, S., Bowyer, V., et al., (2018). T1-REDEEM: A randomized controlled trial to reduce diabetes distress among adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 41, 1862–1869.
Hanna, K. M., Juarez, B., Lenss, S. S., & Guthrie, D. (2003). Parent–adolescent communication and support for diabetes management as reported by sdolescents with type 1 diabetes. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 26, 145–158.
Hanna, K. M., Weaver, M. T., Stump, T. E., Dimeglio, L. A., Miller, A. R., Crowder, S., et al. (2013). Initial findings: Primary diabetes care responsibility among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes post high school and move out of parental home. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39(1), 61–68.
Helgeson, V. S., Palladino, D. K., Reynolds, K. A., Becker, D. J., Escobar, O., & Siminerio, L. M. (2013). Relationships and health among emerging adults with and without type 1 diabetes. Health Psychology, 38, 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033511
Helgeson, V. S., Palladino, D. K., Reynolds, K. A., Becker, D. J., Escobar, O., & Siminerio, L. (2014). Relationships and health among emerging adults with and without type 1 diabetes. Health Psychology, 33, 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033511
Helgeson, V. S., Vaughn, A. K., Seltman, H., Orchard, T., Becker, D., & Libman, I. (2018). Relation of parent knowledge to glycemic control among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: A mediational model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 41, 186–194.
Hood, K. K., Peterson, C. M., Rohan, J. M., & Drotar, D. (2009). Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 124, e1171–e1179.
Jones, K. R., Lekhak, N., & Kaewluang, N. (2014). Using mobile phones and short message service to deliver self-management interventions for chronic conditions: A meta-review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11, 81–88.
King, P. S., Berg, C. A., Butner, J., Butler, J. M., & Wiebe, D. J. (2014). Longitudinal trajectories of parental involvement in type 1 diabetes and adolescents’ adherence. Health Psychology, 33, 424–432.
Lewin, A. B., LaGreca, A. M., Geffken, G. R., Williams, L. B., Duke, D. C., Storch, E. A., et al., (2009). Validity and reliability of an adolescent and parent rating scale of type 1 diabetes adherence behaviors: The self-care inventory (SCI). Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 999–1007.
Miller, K. M., Foster, N. C., Beck, R. W., et al. (2015). Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: Updated data from the T1D exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care, 38(6), 971–978. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0078
Monaghan, M, Hilliard, M., Sweenie, R., & Riekert, K. (2013). Transition readiness in adolescents and emerging adults with diabetes: The role of patient-provider communication. Current Diabetes Reports, 13, 900–908.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569.
Osborn, P., Berg, C. A., Hughes, A. E., Pham, P., & Wiebe, D. J. (2013). What mom and dad don’t know CAN hurt you: Adolescent disclosure to and secrecy from parents about type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38, 141–150.
Palladino, D. K., & Helgeson, V. S. (2012). Friends or foes? A review of peer influence on self-care and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 37, 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jss009
Peters, A., & Laffel, L. (2011). Diabetes care for emerging adults: Recommendations for transition from pediatric to adult diabetes care systems: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association, with representation by the American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Osteopathic Association, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Children with Diabetes, The Endocrine Society, the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, the National Diabetes Education Program, and the Pediatric Endocrine Society (formerly Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society). Diabetes Care, 34, 2477–2485.
Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2013). “She’s leaving home…” antecedents, consequences, and cultural patterns in the leaving home process. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 114–124.
Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination. The American Psychologist, 45, 938–953.
Uchino, B. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 236–255.
Weissberg-Benchell, J., Wolpert, H., & Anderson, B. J. (2007). Transitioning from pediatric to adult care: A new approach to the post-adolescent young person with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30, 2441–2446. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-1249
Wiebe, D. J., Berg, C. A., Mello, D., & Kelly, C. S. (2018). Self- and social-regulation in type 1 diabetes management during late adolescence and emerging adulthood. Current Diabetes Reports, 18, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-0995-3
Wiebe, D. J., Chow, C. M., Palmer, D. L., Butner, J. E., Butler, J. M., Osborn, P., et al. (2014). Developmental processes associated with longitudinal declines in parental responsibility and adherence to type 1 diabetes management across adolescence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsu006
Willi, S. M., Miller, K. M., DiMeglio, L. A., Klingensmith, G. J., Simmons, J. H., Tamborlane, W. V., et al. (2015). Racial-ethnic disparities in management and outcomes among children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatrics, 135, 424–434.
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by National Science Foundation and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Grant No. R01DK092939).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
A. K. Munion, Jonathan E. Butner, Caitlin S. Kelly, Deborah J. Wiebe, Sara L. Turner, Amy Hughes Lansing and Cynthia A. Berg declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All research was conducted under the guidance and oversight of the University of Utah, University of California at Merced, and University of Texas Southwestern Institutional Review Boards.
Human and animal rights and informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Munion, A.K., Butner, J.E., Kelly, C.S. et al. The separation in coordination between social- and self-regulation for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. J Behav Med 43, 892–903 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00134-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00134-5