Abstract
The effects of a static electric field on the dynamics of lysozyme and its hydration water are investigated by means of incoherent quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS). Measurements were performed on lysozyme samples, hydrated respectively with heavy water (D 2O) to capture the protein dynamics and with light water (H 2O), to probe the dynamics of the hydration shell, in the temperature range from 210 < T < 260 K. The hydration fraction in both cases was about ∼ 0.38 gram of water per gram of dry protein. The field strengths investigated were respectively 0 kV/mm and 2 kV/mm ( ∼2 × 10 6 V/m) for the protein hydrated with D 2O and 0 kV and 1 kV/mm for the H 2O-hydrated counterpart. While the overall internal protons dynamics of the protein appears to be unaffected by the application of an electric field up to 2 kV/mm, likely due to the stronger intra-molecular interactions, there is also no appreciable quantitative enhancement of the diffusive dynamics of the hydration water, as would be anticipated based on our recent observations in water confined in silica pores under field values of 2.5 kV/mm. This may be due to the difference in surface interactions between water and the two adsorption hosts (silica and protein), or to the existence of a critical threshold field value E c ∼2–3 kV/mm for increased molecular diffusion, for which electrical breakdown is a limitation for our sample.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roth, C., Lenhof, A.: Quantitative modelling of protein adsorption. In: Malmsten, M (eds.) Biopolymers at Interfaces, Surfactant Science Series, vol. 75, pp. 89–118. Marcel Dekker, New-York (1998)
Talasaz, A.A.H., Nemat-Gorgani, M., Liu, Y., Stahl, P., Dutton, R.W., Ronaghi, M., Davis, R.W.: Prediction of protein orientation upon immobilization on biological and nonbiological surfaces. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(40), 14,773 (2006)
Subrahmanyam, S., Piletsky, S.A., Turner, A.P.F.: Application of natural receptors in sensors and assays. Anal. Chem. 74(16), 3942–3951 (2002)
Ojeda-May, P., Garcia, M.E.: Electric field-driven disruption of a native β-sheet protein conformation and generation of a helix-structure. Biophys. J. 99(2), 595–599 (2010)
Lange, A., Gattin, Z., Van Melckebeke, H., Wasmer, C., Soragni, A., van Gunsteren, W.F., Meier, B.H.: A combined solid-state nmr and md characterization of the stability and dynamics of the het-s(218–289) prion in its amyloid conformation. Chem. Bio. Chem. 10, 1657–1665 (2009)
Teixeira, J., Bellissent-Funel, M.C., Chen, S.H., Dianoux, A.J.: Experimental-determination of the nature of diffusive motions of water-molecules. Phys. Rev. A 30, 1913 (1985)
Xu, D., Phillips, J.C., Schulten, K.: Protein response to external electric fields: relaxation, hysteresis, and echo. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12,108–12,112 (1996)
Taleb, M., Didierjean, C., Jelsch, C., Mangeot, J., Aubry, A.: Equilibrium kinetics of lysozyme crystallization under an external electric field. J. Crys. Growth 232, 250–255 (2001)
Nanev, C.N., Penkova, A.: Nucleation of lysozyme crystals under external electric and ultrasonic fields. J. Crys. Growth 232, 285–293 (2001)
Pompa, P.P., Bramanti, A., Maruccio, G., Cingolani, R., Rienzo, F.D., Corni, S., Felice, R.D., Rinaldi, R.: Retention of nativelike conformation by proteins embedded in high external electric fields. J. Chem. Phys. 122(181), 102 (2005)
Marklund, E.G., Larsson, D.S.D., van der Spoel, D., Patriksson, A., Caleman, C.: Structural stability of electrosprayed proteins: temperature and hydration effects. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 8069–8078 (2009)
Abrikossov, A.: Computer simulations: orientation of Lysozyme in vacuum under the influence of an electric field. Student Thesis, Uppsala Universitet (2011)
Sun, D.P., Liao, D.I., Remington, S.J.: Electrostatic fields in the active sites of lysozymes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86(14), 5361–5365 (1989)
Budi, A., Legge, F.S., Treutlein, H., Yarovsky, I.: Effect of frequency on insulin response to electric field stress. J. Phys. Chem. B 111(20), 5748–5756 (2007)
Varga, B.: Study of solvent-protein coupling effects by neutron scattering. J. Bio. Phys. 36, 207 (2010)
Roh, J., Curtis, J., Azzam, S., Novikov, V., Peral, I., Chowdhuri, Z., Gregory, R., Sokolov, A.: Influence of hydration on the dynamics of lysozyme. Biophys. J. 91(7), 2573–2588 (2006)
Bon, C., Dianoux, A., Ferrand, M., Lehmann, M.: A model for water motion in crystals of lysozyme based on an incoherent quasielastic neutron-scattering study. Biophys. J. 83(3), 1578–1588 (2002)
Diallo, S.O., Mamontov, E., Wada, N., Inagaki, S., Fukushima, Y.: Enhanced translational difusion of confined water under electric field. Phys. Rev. E 86(6), 021506 (2012)
Vegiri, A.: Translational dynamics of a cold water cluster in the presence of an external uniform electric field. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 8786 (2002)
Mamontov, E., O’Neill, H., Zhang, Q.: Mean-squared atomic displacements in hydrated lysozyme, native and denatured. J. Biol. Phys. 36(3) (2010)
Mamontov, E., Herwig, K.: A time-of-flight backscattering spectrometer at the spallation neutron source, basis. Rev. Sci. Inst. 82(10), 085109 (2011)
Orecchini, A., Paciaroni, A., De Francesco, A., Sani, L., Marconi, M., Laloni, A., Guarini, E., Formisano, F., Petrillo, C., Sacchetti, F.: Brillouin spectroscopy of protein hydration water: new experimental potentialities opened up by the thermal neutron spectrometer brisp. Meas. Sci. Tech. 19(3), 034026 (2008)
Orecchini, A., Paciaroni, A., De Francesco, A., Petrillo, C., Sacchetti, F.: Collective dynamics of protein hydration water by brillouin neutron spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(13), 4664 (2009)
Qvist, J., Schober, H., Halle, B.: Structural dynamics of supercooled water from quasielastic neutron scattering and molecular simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 134(20), 144508 (2011)
Matyushov, D.V.: Dipolar response of hydrated proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 136(8), 085102 (2012)
Liu, L., Chen, S.H., Faraone, A., Yen, C., Mou, C.Y.: Pressure dependence of fragile-to-strong transition and a possible second critical point in supercooled confined water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(4), 117802 (2005)
Mamontov, E.: Observation of fragile-to-strong liquid transition in surface water in CeO2. J. Chem. Phys. 123(4), 171101 (2005)
Liu, L., Chen, S-H, Faraone, A., Yen, C.-W., Mou, C.-Y., Kolesnikov, A.I., Mamontov, E., Leao, J.: Quasielastic and inelastic neutron scattering investigation of fragile-to-strong crossover in deeply super-cooled water confined in nanoporous silica matrices. J. Phys. Condens. Mat. 18, S2261–S2284 (2006)
Doster, W., Busch, S., Gaspar, A.M., Appavou, M.-S., Wuttke, J., Scheer, H.: Dynamical transition of protein-hydration water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(4), 098101 (2010)
Hong, L., Smolin, N., Lindner, B., Sokolov, A.P., Smith, J.C.: Three classes of motion in the dynamic neutron-scattering susceptibility of a globular protein. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(4), 148102 (2011)
Khodadadi, S., Curtis, J.E., Sokolov, A.P.: Nanosecond relaxation dynamics of hydrated proteins: water versus protein contributions. J. Phys. Chem. B 115(19), 6222–6226 (2011)
Azuah, R.T., Kneller, L.R., Qiu, Y., Tregenna-Piggott, P.L.W., Brown, C.M., Copley, J.R.D., Dimeo, R.M.J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan. Technol. 114, 341 (2009)
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the use of the DAVE software in part of the data analysis [32]. We thank C. Stanley at ORNL for stimulating discussions. It is also a pleasure to acknowledge R. Goyette, R. Mills, D. Maierhafer, R. Moody and M. Loguillo at SNS for valuable technical support. PF acknowledges the GEM fellowship program at UTK. HON and QZ acknowledge the support of the Center for Structural Molecular Biology at ORNL supported by the U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research Project ERKP291. Work at ORNL and SNS is sponsored by the Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. DOE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Favi, P.M., Zhang, Q., O’Neill, H. et al. Dynamics of lysozyme and its hydration water under an electric field. J Biol Phys 40, 167–178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-014-9343-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-014-9343-2