Abstract
Mosaic trees contain more than one phenotype. The two Eucalyptus mosaic trees studied here (E. melliodora and E. sideroxylon) are predominantly susceptible to insect herbivory, with the leaves on a single large branch on each tree resisting herbivory. We used gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and high-pressure liquid chromatography to analyze the chemical profile of leaves of the mosaic trees, as well as leaves of adjacent non-mosaic con-specifics. We show that the leaves of the two phenotypes are distinctly different. Compared to the susceptible (S) leaves on the same tree, the resistant (R) leaves on the mosaic trees had low concentrations of sesquiterpenes (E. melliodora: 2 vs. 24 mg·g−1 dry matter; E. sideroxylon: 8 vs. 22 mg·g−1 dry matter), high concentrations of FPCs (E. melliodora: 5.4 vs. 0.3 mg·g−1 dry matter; E. sideroxylon: 9.8 vs. 0.2 mg·g−1 dry matter) but similar concentrations of nitrogen (E. melliodora: 15.4 vs. 16.8 mg·g−1 dry matter; E. sideroxylon: 13.1 vs. 14.0 mg·g−1 dry matter). The only difference between the two mosaic trees was in the levels of monoterpenes. The R leaves from the mosaic E. melliodora contained higher concentrations of monoterpenes compared to the S leaves (12 vs. 6 mg·g−1 dry matter). In contrast, the leaves from the E. sideroxylon mosaic contained much higher concentrations of monoterpenes with a reversed pattern (R: 26 vs. S: 45 mg·g−1 dry matter). There were qualitative differences too on the mosaic trees. The R leaves of both species contained much higher concentrations of the monoterpene, 1,8-cineole, whereas the S chemotype of E. sideroxylon only had high concentrations of phellandrenes. Furthermore, the chemical differences between leaves on the R and S branches of the mosaic trees resembled those between the leaves of R and S con-specific trees in the same population. We use these data and knowledge of secondary metabolite biosynthesis to propose that high-level transcriptional differences may control the profile of specialized metabolites in eucalypts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrew, R. L., Wallis, I. R., Harwood, C. E., Henson, M., and Foley, W. J. 2007. Heritable variation in the foliar secondary metabolite sideroxylonal in Eucalyptus confers cross-resistance to herbivores. Oecologia 153:891–901.
Andrew, R. L., Wallis, I. R., Harwood, C. E., and Foley, W. J. 2010. Genetic and environmental contributions to variation and population divergence in a broad-spectrum foliar defence of Eucalyptus tricarpa. Ann. Bot. 105:707–717.
Arimura, G., Ozawa, R., Kugimiya, S., Takabayashi, J., and Bohlmann, J. 2004. Herbivore-induced defense response in a model legume. Two-spotted spider mites induce emission of (E)-beta-ocimene and transcript accumulation of (E)-beta-ocimene synthase in Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol. 135:1976–1983.
Brooker, M. I. H. 2000. A new classification of the genus Eucalyptus L'Her. (Myrtaceae). Austral. System. Bot. 13:79–148.
Bryant, J., Chapin III, F., and Klein, D. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368.
Butcher, P. A., Doran, J. C., and Slee, M. U. 1994. Intraspecific variation in the leaf oils of Melaleuca alternifolia (Myrtaceae). Biochem. System. Ecol. 22:419–430.
Crous, P. W., Summerell, B. A., Carnegie, A., Mohammed, C., Himaman, W., and Groenewald, J. Z. 2007. Foliicolous Mycosphaerella spp. and their anamorphs on Corymbia and Eucalyptus. Fungal Diversity 26:143–185.
Degenhardt, J. and Gershenzon, J. 2000. Demonstration and characterization of (E)-nerolidol synthase from maize: a herbivore-inducible terpene synthase participating in (3E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene biosynthesis. Planta 210:815–822.
Edwards, P. B., Wanjura, W. J., and Brown, W. V. 1993. Selective herbivory by Christmas beetles in response to intraspecific variation in Eucalyptus terpenoids. Oecologia 95:551–557.
Edwards, P. B., Wanjura, W. J., Brown, W. V., and Dearn, J. M. 1990. Mosaic resistance in plants. Nature 347:434.
Eschler, B. M. and Foley, W. J. 1999. A new sideroxylonal from Eucalyptus melliodora. Austral. J. Chem. 52:157–158.
Gill, D. E. 1986. Individual plants as genetic mosaics: ecological organisms versus evolutionary individuals, pp. 321–343, in M. J. Crawley (ed.), Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Carlton City.
Halliwell, B. 1999. Oxygen and nitrogen are pro-carcinogens. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen, chlorine and nitrogen species: measurement, mechanism and the effects of nutrition. Mut. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 443:37–52.
Henery, M. L., Moran, G. F., Wallis, I. R., and Foley, W. J. 2007. Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing foliar concentrations of terpenes and formylated phloroglucinol compounds in Eucalyptus nitens. New Phytol. 176:82–95.
Herrera, C. M. 2009. Multiplicity in unity: plant subindividual variation and interactions with animals, in J. N. Thompson (ed.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Joseph, G., Kelsey, R. G., Moldenke, A. F., Miller, J. C., Berry, R. E., and Wernz, J. G. 1993. Effects of nitrogen and Douglas-fir allelochemicals on development of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1245–1263.
Keane, P. J., Kile, G. A., and Podger, F. D. 2000. Diseases and Pathogens of Eucalypts. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
Keszei, A., Brubaker, C. L., and Foley, W. J. 2008. A molecular perspective on terpene variation in Australian Myrtaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 56:197–213.
Kleine, S. and Müller, C. 2011. Intraspecific plant chemical diversity and its relation to herbivory. Oecologia 166:175–186.
Külheim, C., Webb, H., Yeoh, S. H., Wallis, I., Moran, G., and Foley, W. 2011. Using the Eucalyptus genome to understand the evolution of plant secondary metabolites in the Myrtaceae. BMC Proceedings 5(Suppl 7):O11.
Lawler, I. R., Stapley, J., Foley, W. J., and Eschler, B. M. 1999. Ecological example of conditioned flavor aversion in plant–herbivore interactions: effect of terpenes of Eucalyptus leaves on feeding by common ringtail and brushtail possums. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:401–415.
Marcotrigiano, M. 2000. Herbivory could unlock mutations sequestered in stratified shoot apices of genetic mosaics. Am. J. Bot. 87:355–361.
Matsuki, M., Foley, W. J., and Floyd, R. B. 2011. Role of volatile and nonvolatile plant secondary metabolites in host tree selection by Christmas beetles. J. Chem. Ecol. 37:286–300.
Mcgregor, S. E. 1976. Insect Pollination of Cultivated Crop Plants: USDA Agriculture Handbook 496. Washington, D.C.
Moore, B. D., Foley, W. J., Wallis, I. R., Cowling, A., and Handasyde, K. A. 2005. Eucalyptus foliar chemistry explains selective feeding by koalas. Biol. Lett. 1:64–67.
Moore, B. D., Wallis, I. R., Palá-Paúl, J., Brophy, J. J., Willis, R. H., and Foley, W. J. 2004. Antiherbivore chemistry of Eucalyptus - cues and deterrents for marsupial folivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 30:1743–1769.
Morrow, P. A. and Fox, L. R. 1980. Effects of variation in Eucalyptus essential oil yield on insect growth and grazing damage. Oecologia 45:209–219.
Padovan, A., Keszei, A., Koellner, T. G., Degenhardt, J., and Foley, W. J. 2010. The molecular basis of host plant selection in Melaleuca quinquenervia by a successful biological control agent. Phytochemistry 71:1237–1244.
Penfold, A. R. and Morrison, F. R. 1937. The occurrence of a number of varieties of Euclayptus radiata (E. numerosa) as determined by chemical analyses of the essential oils. Part II. J. Roy. Soc. New South Wales 20:375–377.
Pichersky, E., Noel, J. P., and Dudareva, N. 2006. Biosynthesis of plant volatiles: nature’s diversity and ingenuity. Science 311:808–811.
Ramanoelina, P. A. R., Viano, J., Bianchini, J. P., and Gaydou, E. M. 1994. Occurence of various chemotypes in Niaouli (Melalecua quinquenervia) essential oils from Madagascar using multivariate statistical analysis. J. Agr. Food Chem. 42:1177–1182.
Slee, A. V., Brooker, M. I. H., Duffy, S. M., and West, J. G. 2006. EUCLID Eucalypts of Australia, 3rd ed. CSIRO, Canberra.
Southwell, I. A. and Russell, M. F. 2002. Volatile oil comparison of cotyledon leaves of chemotypes of Melaleuca alternifolia. Phytochemistry 59:391–393.
Trilles, B. L., Bombarda, I., Bouraïma-Madjebi, S., Raharivelomanana, P., Bianchini, J.-P., and Gaydou, E. M. 2006. Occurrence of various chemotypes in niaouli [Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S. T. Blake] essential oil from New Caledonia. Flavour Frag J. 21:677–682.
Wallis, I. R. and Foley, W. J. 2005. The rapid determination of sideroxylonals in Eucalyptus foliage by extraction with sonication followed by HPLC. Phytochem. Anal. 16:49–54.
Wallis, I. R., Keszei, A., Henery, M. L., Moran, G. F., Forrester, R., Maintz, J., Marsh, K. J., Andrew, R. L., and Foley, W. J. 2011. A chemical perspective on the evolution of variation in Eucalyptus globulus. Perspectives in Plant Ecology. Evolut. Syst. 13:305–318.
Whitham, T. G. and Slobodchikoff, C. N. 1981. Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: the adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia 49:287–292.
Acknowledgements
Mosaic trees came to the attention of scientists through the keen observations of Mr Kevin Barker of Yeoval NSW. Dr Penny Edwards and Dr Wolf Wanjura of CSIRO kindly showed us the trees and facilitated our work in many ways. We thank the late Mr Herb Healey, the late Mr Kevin Barker, Mr Bruce Lees, and Mr Simon Dwyer for allowing us access to their properties. We also thank Ms Jessie Au and Ms Hannah Windley for their assistance with nitrogen analysis. This work was supported by a Discovery grant from the Australian Research Council to WJF (DP0877063) and an Australian Geographic Seed Grant to AP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Padovan, A., Keszei, A., Wallis, I.R. et al. Mosaic Eucalypt Trees Suggest Genetic Control at a Point That Influences Several Metabolic Pathways. J Chem Ecol 38, 914–923 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0149-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0149-z