Skip to main content
Log in

Gambling with Stimulus Payments: Feeding Gaming Machines with Federal Dollars

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In late 2008 and early 2009 the Australian Federal Government introduced a series of economic stimulus packages designed to maintain consumer spending in the early days of the Great Recession. When these packages were initiated the media suggested that the wide-spread availability of electronic gaming machines (EGMs, e.g. slot machines, poker machines, video lottery terminals) in Australia would result in stimulating the EGMs. Using state level monthly data we estimate that the stimulus packages led to an increase of 26 % in EGM revenues. This also resulted in over $60 million in additional tax revenue for State Governments. We also estimate a short-run aggregate income demand elasticity for EGMs to be approximately 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here we refer to EMGs to describe a variety of electronic slot machines or video lottery terminals (VLTs) that use random number generators to determine outcomes. The term “pokies” is the Australian vernacular for poker machines, the most common electronic gaming machine in use in Australia. These machines are programmed to provide a regulated probability of a payoff.

  2. The term hotel in Australia is used to refer to an establishment that may only have a bar and a tavern, usually with limited or no sleeping accommodation and are run as profit making enterprises. Clubs are usually smaller than a casino and are owned by local organizations such as social and sports clubs which are run for the benefit of the members. The majority of EGMS are located in hotels and clubs.

  3. All $ amounts here are quoted in Australian dollars unless otherwise stated. During the period of the stimulus (from Dec 2008 to March 2009) the average exchange rate for the $AU and the $US was 0.67$US = 1$AU.

  4. Kevin Rudd was the Prime Minister of Australia at the time of the Economic Stimulus payments.

  5. These figures were obtained from annual New South Wales Treasury documents.

  6. The sources of the data are www.vcgr.vic.gov.au; www.olgc.sa.gov.au; www.olgr.qld.gov.au. New South Wales is traditionally much less forthcoming about the provision of details of their gambling industry.

  7. Note in this case we explicitly do not use HAC standard errors due to possible generation of inconsistent inferences as noted by Fomby and Murfin (2005) for similar event studies.

  8. A further check of this specification was made where event dummy variables where included for all other December, April, May, and June combinations possible in the span of the data and no other combination was found to have any significant positive impact on demand.

  9. Source: Australian National Accounts publication ABS 5206.0 Table 14 Household income account, current prices.

  10. Note that this is not an estimate of individual income elasticity for gaming. Because most of the stimulus was paid to households that are on the lower end of the income distribution—the estimate for the disposable income of those individuals who received the payments is probably too high which would make their % increase in quarterly income higher and thus lower the implied elasticity. Also because there was little price variation over this period we can assume the shift in demand was predominantly due to the short-run income shock.

  11. Note that the Australian government’s stimulus to the construction industry via infrastructure investment is not included in this amount since its influence on disposable income would have occurred over a much longer period.

  12. These calculations only take into take into account the revenue from gaming collected by the States. The Australian Government also charges a goods and services tax on gambling expenditure and this is also returned to the States and Territories. The amount States received as a result of the goods and services tax is not included in these calculations.

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2007). Government Benefits, Taxes and Household Income, 2003–2004, #6537.0.

  • Australian Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries: Inquiry report. Volume 3 Appendices, November.

  • Australian Productivity Commission. (2005). Economic implications of an ageing Australia, Technical Report T10, Gambling Revenue.

  • Coughlin, C., & Garrett, T. (2009). Income and lottery sales: Transfers trump income from work and wealth. Public Finance Review, 37, 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. H., & Le Couteur A. (2007). A decade of gambling research in Australia and New Zealand: Implications for policy, research and harm minimization. Report prepared for the Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia. http://www.iga.sa.gov.au/.

  • Dowling, J., Moncrief M., & Martin P. (2009) Pokies binge follows hand-out: Figures indicate ‘bandits’ took plenty, The Age. January 24, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Epley, N., Mak, D., & Idson, L. (2006). Bonus or rebate? The impact of income framing on spending and saving. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fomby, T., & Murfin, J. (2005). Inconsistency of HAC standard errors in event studies with iid errors. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 1, 239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, J., & Ross, N. (2005). Opportunities for video lottery terminal gambling in Montreal: An environmental analysis. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96, 55–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. G., & Lye, J. N. (2010). The indirect impacts of smoking bans in gaming venues, Chapter 11. In D. Slottje & R. Tchernis (Eds.), Current issues in health economics. Contributions to economic analysis (Vol. 290, pp. 243–259). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

  • Ife, H., & Collier K. (2008). Shoppers urged to spend for Australia, Herald Sun. December 6, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Keeler, J., James, W., & Abdel-Ghany, M. (1985). The relative size of windfall income and the permanent income hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3, 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, D., & Young, M. (2011). ‘Pushing buttons’: An evaluation of the effect of aboriginal income management on commercial gambling expenditure. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 46, 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, A. (2009). How much did the 2009 Fiscal Stimulus boost spending? Evidence from a household survey, Centre for Applied Macroeconomics Analysis Working Paper No. 22/2209 September.

  • Lewis, L. (2009). Chinese bail-out cash heads for Macau’s casinos rather than Guagdong factories, The Times (London) Business, June 20, 51.

  • Lewis, L. (2010). Gambling dens eye up Japan’s child subsidy: State pay-out is hidden bonus for pinball parlours, The Times (London) Business, March 11, 65.

  • Liang, Y. (2010). China and the global financial crisis: Assessing the impacts and policy responses. China and World Economy, 18, 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K. (2000). Update on gambling. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 12, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D., & Baker, R. (2001). Clubs, spades, diamonds and disadvantage: The geography of electronic gaming machines in Melbourne. Australian Geographical Studies, 39, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D., & Baker, R. (2002). The evolving market structures of gambling: Case studies modelling the socioeconomic assignment of gaming machines in Melbourne and Sydney Australia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 273–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K., & Wynne, H. (2004). Against the odds: A profile of at-risk and problem gamblers. Canadian Social Trends, 73, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, J., Jackson, A., & Thomas, S. (2003). Gambling and older people in Australia. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 22, 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. A., Souleles N., Johnson D., & McClelland R. (2011). Consumer Spending and the Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008, NBER Working Paper No. 16684 January.

  • Perez, L., & Humphreys, B. R. (2011). The income elasticity of lottery: New evidence from micro data. Public Finance Review, 39, 551–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2009). Gambling Draft Report, October, Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Reilly, T. (2008), “Rudd’s handouts feed statewide betting binge”, The Age, 28 December, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Reserve Bank of Australia. (2009). “The RBA’s role in processing the Fiscal Stimulus payments” Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin August Article 1.

  • Roy Morgan Research. (1997) Older people and gambling, report prepared for the Victorian Casino and Gambling Authority, September.

  • Saces (South Australian Centre for Economic Studies). (2006). The South Australian Gambling Industry Final Report, Commissioned for South Australian Independent Gambling Authority http://www.iga.sa.gov.au/.

  • Sahm, C., Shapiro M., & Slemrod J. (2009). Household response to the 2008 tax rebate: Survey evidence and aggregate implications, NBER Working Paper Series 15421 October.

  • South Australian Centre for Economic studies (SACES). (2006). The South Australian Gambling Industry Final Report 2006, downloaded 23/3/2011 from www.iga.gov.au.

  • State Government of Victoria. (1994). Review of electronic gaming machines in Victoria. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutz, H. (2008). Inside gaming: Stimulus payments may go out of pockets onto felt, Las Vegas Review-Journal, Business 1E.

  • Suits, D. B. (1979). The elasticity of demand for gambling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanton, R. (2009). Who received most from the household stimulus package? Commentary at Australian Policy Online, http://apo.org.au/commentary/who-received-most-household-stimulus-package.

  • Vaughan, J. (2009). “Xenophon says handout money was poured into pokies”, The Advertiser, January 18, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Victorian Department of Justice. (2011). The Victorian Gambling Study a longitudinal study of gambling and public health-wave two findings. Department of Justice, State of Victoria.

  • Volberg, R., Abbott, M., Rönnberg, S., & Munck, I. (2001). Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 104, 250–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests of aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 500–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Kwan, F. (2010). Financial crisis offers respite for the Macao economy. In Z. Yongnian & S. Tong (Eds.), China and the global crisis. Series on contemporary China (Vol. 22, pp. 159–178). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Hirschberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lye, J., Hirschberg, J. Gambling with Stimulus Payments: Feeding Gaming Machines with Federal Dollars. J Gambl Stud 30, 713–727 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9377-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9377-6

Keywords

Navigation