Skip to main content
Log in

Causal Learning in Gambling Disorder: Beyond the Illusion of Control

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Causal learning is the ability to progressively incorporate raw information about dependencies between events, or between one’s behavior and its outcomes, into beliefs of the causal structure of the world. In spite of the fact that some cognitive biases in gambling disorder can be described as alterations of causal learning involving gambling-relevant cues, behaviors, and outcomes, general causal learning mechanisms in gamblers have not been systematically investigated. In the present study, we compared gambling disorder patients against controls in an instrumental causal learning task. Evidence of illusion of control, namely, overestimation of the relationship between one’s behavior and an uncorrelated outcome, showed up only in gamblers with strong current symptoms. Interestingly, this effect was part of a more complex pattern, in which gambling disorder patients manifested a poorer ability to discriminate between null and positive contingencies. Additionally, anomalies were related to gambling severity and current gambling disorder symptoms. Gambling-related biases, as measured by a standard psychometric tool, correlated with performance in the causal learning task, but not in the expected direction. Indeed, performance of gamblers with stronger biases tended to resemble the one of controls, which could imply that anomalies of causal learning processes play a role in gambling disorder, but do not seem to underlie gambling-specific biases, at least in a simple, direct way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the beck depression inventory-it. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, F., Matute, H., & Vadillo, M. A. (2009). Depressive realism: Wiser or quieter? Psychological Record, 59, 551–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, F., Matute, H., & Vadillo, M. A. (2012). Mediating role of the activity level in the depressive realism effect. PLoS ONE, 7, e46203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, K. R., & Norman, A. C. (1998). Arousal, erroneous verbalizations and the illusion of control during a computer-generated gambling task. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 629–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeburúa, E., Báez, C., Fernández-Montalvo, J., & Páez, D. (1994). Cuestionario de Juego Patológico de South Oaks (SOGS): Validación española. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 20, 769–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An extension of box’s result on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 885–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattori, M., & Oaksford, M. (2007). Adaptive non-interventional heuristics for covariation detection in causal induction: Model comparison and rational analysis. Cognitive Science, 31, 765–814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, L. K., Sescousse, G., Hashemi, M. M., Timmer, M. H. M., ter Huurne, N. P., Geurts, D. E. M., et al. (2015). Abnormal modulation of reward versus punishment learning by a dopamine D2-receptor antagonist in pathological gamblers. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 232(18), 3345–3353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, I., Versmissen, D., Campo, J. A., Myin-Germeys, I., Os, J. V., & Krabbendam, L. (2006). Attribution style and psychosis: Evidence for an externalizing bias in patients but not in individuals at high risk. Psychological Medicine, 36, 771–778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, R. K., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2011). Human dorsal striatal activity during choice discriminates reinforcement learning behavior from the gambler’s fallacy. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(17), 6296–6304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joukhador, J., Blaszczynski, A., & MacCallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: Preliminary data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 171–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, D., Delfabbro, P., & Griffiths, M. (2010). Video game structural characteristics: A new psychological taxonomy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 90–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalczuk, R., Bowden-Jones, H., Verdejo-García, A., & Clark, L. (2011). Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report. Psychological Medicine, 41(12), 2625–2635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. T., & Fresco, D. M. (2012). Depressive realism: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 496–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G. S., & Eidem, M. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 561–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orgaz, C., Estévez, A., & Matute, H. (2013). Pathological gamblers are more vulnerable to the illusion of control in a standard associative learning task. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrero-Pérez, E. J., Rodríguez-Monje, M. T., Gallardo, F., Fernández-Girón, M., Pérez-López, M., & Chicharro, J. (2007). Validación de un instrumento para la detección de trastornos de control de impulsos y adicciones: el MULTICAGE CAD–4. Trastornos Adictivos, 9(4), 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perales, J. C., & Catena, A. (2006). Human causal induction: A glimpse at the whole picture. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 277–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perales, J. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Models of covariation-based causal judgment: A review and synthesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 577–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2004). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): Development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, 99, 757–769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Remmerswaal, D., Huijding, J., Bouwmeester, S., Brouwer, M., & Muris, P. (2014). Cognitive bias in action: evidence for a reciprocal relation between confirmation bias and fear in children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz de Lara, C. M., Navas, J. F., & Perales, J. C. (2016). Resting-state activity of the insula: Differences between gambling disorder patients and controls and contribution to gambling-related symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5, 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, J., Perdigón, L. A., & Vázquez, C. (2003). Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck–II (BDI–II): 2. Propiedades psicométricas en población general. Clínica y Salud, 14(3), 249–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, D. R., Tunney, R. J., & McCarthy, J. D. (2002). A re-examination of probability matching and rational choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Holst, R. J., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D. J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2010). Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(1), 87–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanes, L. D., Holst, R. J., Jansen, J. M., Brink, W., Oosterlaan, J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2014). Contingency learning in alcohol dependence and pathological gambling: learning and unlearning reward contingencies. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 38(6), 1602–1610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). NCS Pearson: San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. A. (2011). Causal judgements about two causal candidates: Accounting for occurrences, estimating strength, and the importance of interaction judgements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 485–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xian, H., Shah, K. R., Phillips, S. M., Scherrer, J. F., Volberg, R., & Eisen, S. A. (2008). Association of cognitive distortions with problem and pathological gambling in adult male twins. Psychiatry Research, 160(3), 300–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yarritu, I., Matute, H., & Vadillo, M. A. (2014). Illusion of control: The role of personal involvement. Experimental Psychology, 61, 38–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. M., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2009). The gambling craving scale: Psychometric validation and behavioral outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(3), 512–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research described in this paper has been funded by a grant to the research group from the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Secretaría de Estado de Invetigación, Desarrollo e Innovación; Convocatoria 2013 de Proyectos I + D de Excelencia), with reference number PSI2013-45055. The second and third authors have been awarded with individual research grants (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Programa FPU, reference number FPU13/00669; and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Programa FPI, reference number, BES-2014-070336, respectively).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristian M. Ruiz de Lara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All participants were informed about the procedure followed in the study and signed informed consent. All protocols performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of the University of Granada and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perales, J.C., Navas, J.F., Ruiz de Lara, C.M. et al. Causal Learning in Gambling Disorder: Beyond the Illusion of Control. J Gambl Stud 33, 705–717 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9634-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9634-6

Keywords

Navigation