Skip to main content
Log in

Responsible Gambling in Canada: An Analysis of the RG Check Patron Surveys

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This study analyzed the Responsible Gambling Check patron survey data from Canadian casinos and racinos collected from 2011-2019 (18,580 patrons and 75 venues). The results indicated increasing awareness and use over time of harm minimization tools among more frequent patrons. Despite these promising trends, it is concerning that a substantial percentage of gamblers are still unaware of the harm minimization tools available. Further, the actual impact of this awareness on responsible gambling behaviour is largely unknown. We suggest greater efforts are needed nation-wide to promote the awareness, utilization, and evaluation of these harm minimization tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGLC (2021, May, 25). How to play for fun. Gamesenseab. https://gamesenseab.ca/how-gambling-works/how-to-play-for-fun/

  • Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, L. (2008). Informed choice and gambling: principles for consumer protection. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 2(1), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M., Rawat, V., Greer, N., Langham, E., Rockloff, M., & Hanley, C. (2017). What is the harm? Applying a public health methodology to measure the impact of gambling problems and harm on quality of life. Journal of Gambling Issues. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2017.36.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. R. (2019). Effectiveness of prevention strategies. In H. Bowden-Jones., C. Dickson., C., Dunland, & O. Simon. Preventing Gambling Addiction. Routledge: Centre for Excessive Gambling (Centre du Jeu Excessif: CJE), Switzerland., & NHS National Problem Gambling Clinic, and Imperial College, London, UK.

  • Christensen, D. R. (2020). Responsible gambling: who is responsible? Critical Gambling Studieshttps://doi.org/10.29173/cgs83.

  • Gainsbury, S. M., Angus, D. J., Procter, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2020). Use of consumer protection tools on internet gambling sites: Customer perceptions, motivators, and barriers to use. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(1), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). A critical review of the harm-minimisation tools available for electronic gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(1), 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., Browne, M., Russell, A. M., Rockloff, M., Rawat, V., Nicoll, F., & Smith, G. (2019). Avoiding gambling harm: an evidence-based set of safe gambling practices for consumers. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0224083-264362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. C., Christensen, D. R., Francis, K. L., & Dowling, N. A. (2016). Consumer perspectives on gambling harm minimisation measures in an Australian jurisdiction. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32, 801–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., Thomason, N., & Ho, W. (2002). Longitudinal Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Problem Gambling Counselling Services, Community Education Strategies and Information Products, Volume 3: Community Education Strategies and Information Products. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Department of Human Services.

  • Najavits, L. M., Grymala, L. D., & George, B. (2003). Can advertising increase awareness of problem gambling? A Statewide survey of impact. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(4), 324–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J., Drawson, A. S., Mushquash, C. J., Mushquash, A. R., & Mazmanian, D. (2017). Harm reduction in gambling: A systematic review of industry strategies. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(6), 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.J., West, B.L., & Simpson, R.I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence, and identified best practices. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study is part of a comprehensive national study of gambling jointly funded by the Canadian Consortium for Gambling Research, the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, GREO, and the Alberta Gambling Research Institute (AGRI). Further information on this study can be found on our website: https://research.ucalgary.ca/alberta-gambling-research-institute/research/national-gambling-study. Thanks go to Dr. Séamus O’Shea, AGRI Board Chair, and Glenda Wong, AGRI Executive Director, for their foresight in helping to formulate and develop the AGRI National Project and in facilitating its successful implementation. Thanks also to Tracy Parker (RGC) and Margo Hilbrecht (GREO) for providing the RG Check patron data and assisting with the some of the methodological details.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren R. Christensen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 

Fig.
figure 1

1RG check 2015–2019 patron survey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christensen, D.R., Nicoll, F., Williams, R.J. et al. Responsible Gambling in Canada: An Analysis of the RG Check Patron Surveys. J Gambl Stud 38, 905–915 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10052-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10052-z

Navigation