Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Synergistic Paths to Happiness: Findings from Seven Countries

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four individual profiles of ways toward happiness were found on a Slovene sample: Full, Empty, Pleasurable, and Meaningful life types. The present study aimed to validate these four types in samples from seven different countries (N = 3690) utilising four different languages. Participants completed the Orientation towards Happiness Scale and measures of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, and ill-being. A two-step cluster analysis was performed with each of the seven country samples. A highly congruent, highly internally replicable four-cluster solution was found in all seven samples. Full and Empty life individuals have high and low scores on all three orientations to happiness, respectively. Pleasurable and Meaningful types reflect two traditional philosophic orientations: Pleasurable life individuals scored high on pleasure, average on engagement and low on meaning orientation, while Meaningful life individuals had high scores on meaning, average on engagement, and low scores on pleasure orientation. The four types differed in subjective happiness and psychological well-being with full life type characterized by the highest scores on subjective happiness and psychological well-being, and Empty life by the lowest scores. On the other hand, depressive symptoms were likely to be the lowest in the Full life type and the highest in the Empty life type. Meaningful and Pleasurable life types were characterized by moderate well- and ill-being, but the two types tended not to differ from each other on the measures used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Detailed results are available from authors on request.

References

  • Anić, P. (2012). How to find happiness: Life goals and free time activities (Doctoral dissertation). Ljubljana, Slovenija: Univerza v Ljubljani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avsec, A., & Kavčič, T. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Slovene version of the orientations to Happiness Questionnaire. Horizons of Psychology, 21(1), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shahar, T. (2007). Happier: Learn the secrets to daily joy and lasting fulfillment. NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.-H. (2010). Validating the orientations to happiness scale in a Chinese sample of university students. Social Indicators Research, 99, 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. H., Tsai, Y.-M., & Chen, M.-Y. (2009). Psychometric analysis of the orientations to happiness questionnaire in Taiwanese undergraduate students. Social Indicator Research, 98, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. M. (2005). Measuring psychological well-being in the Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1307–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T, Jr, Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., Samuels, J., & Ozer, D. J. (2002). The replicability of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five-factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2009). The contribution of diversity to happiness research. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 205–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., & Fontaine, J. (2010). Methods for investigating structural equivalence. In D. Matsumoto & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 179–215). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D., Atkins, R., & Fegley, S. (2003). Personality and development in childhood: A person-centered approach. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(1), 1–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 196–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. W., Knight, T., & Richardson, B. (2014). The hedonic and eudaimonic validity of the orientations to happiness scale. Social Indicators Research, 115, 1087–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstee, W. K. B. (2003). Structures of personality traits. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 231–256). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism a study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huta, W., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kállay, E., & Rus, C. (2014). Psychometric properties of the 44-item version of Ryff’s psychological well-being scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavčič, T., & Avsec, A. (2014). Happiness and pathways to reach it: Dimension-centred vs. person-centred approach. Social Indicators Research, 118, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. G., Williams, S., McGee, R., & Olaman, S. (1997). Psychometric properties of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a sample of women in middle life. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumano, M. (2011). Orientations to happiness in Japanese people: Pleasure, meaning, and engagement. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 81, 619–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, C. N. (2001). Report on the construct validity of the temporal satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 54, 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Ruch, W. (2009). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction in twenty-seven nation. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The temporal satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Harzer, C., Proyer, T. R., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2010). Ways to happiness in German-speaking countries: The adaptation of the German version of the orientations to happiness questionnaire in paper-pencil and internet samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Martín, J., Perles, F., & Canto, J. M. (2010). Life satisfaction and perception of happiness among university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 617–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueller, S. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: Relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Parks, A. C., & Steen, T. (2005a). A balanced psychology and a full life. In F. Huppert, B. Keverne, & N. Baylis (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 275–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T., Parks, A. C., & Peterson, C. (2005b). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61, 774–788.

  • Sirigatti, S., Penzo, I., Iani, L., Mazzeschi, A., Hatalskaja, H., Giannetti, E., & Stefanile, C. (2013). Measurement invariance of Ryff’s psychological well-being scales across Italian and Belarusian students. Social Indicators Research, 113, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. D., & Pearson, J. E. (2008). Internet survey methods: A review of strengths, weaknesses, and innovations. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the internet advances in applied methods and research strategies (pp. 14–36). New York, London: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szondy, M., & Martos, T. (2014). The three faces of happiness: Psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the orientations to happiness scale. Mentalhigiene es Pszichoszomatika, 15, 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, V., Sarala, R., Muchinsky, P., Kemmelmeier, M., Singelis, T. M., Avsec, A., et al. (2014). Opposite ends of the same stick? Multi-method test of the dimensionality of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 213–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2008). Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning—Findings from Australian and US samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., & Søholt, Y. (2011). Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 326–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreja Avsec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avsec, A., Kavčič, T. & Jarden, A. Synergistic Paths to Happiness: Findings from Seven Countries. J Happiness Stud 17, 1371–1390 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9648-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9648-2

Keywords

Navigation