Abstract
Purpose Despite existing rehabilitation services, return to work (RTW) rates among stroke survivors are quite low. An increased number of qualitative studies have been conducted to identify facilitators and barriers to RTW after stroke and to derive recommendations for future interventions. The aim of our study was to carry out a meta-synthesis of those studies and thus strengthen evidence in the field. Methods To identify relevant studies (qualitative studies focusing on RTW after stroke, published in English or German between 2000 and 2015), we conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science. After assessing the quality of eligible studies, we synthesized their findings according to meta-ethnographic methodology. Results Fourteen out of 553 studies—three of very high, seven of high, three of medium, and one of low quality—met the inclusion criteria. After the extraction of all first-order concepts and their translation into 64 second-order interpretations, we synthesized the findings by developing a model of RTW factors after stroke. It contains factors related to the person (impairments, coping/adaptation, significance of work/RTW motivation), workplace (job demands/work adaptations, disability management, work climate/social support), and rehabilitation services (availability, accessibility, appropriateness), as well as relevant factors in the interaction of these three stakeholders (work capacity, performance and capability, and initial RTW experiences). Three basic principles—adaptiveness, purposefulness, and cooperativeness—complete the model and led us to its name: the APC model. Conclusions Successful RTW after stroke depends on diverse factors and stakeholders. Rehabilitation strategies have to consider this; otherwise they become RTW barriers themselves.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
PubMed covers citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. The OVID interface offers access to 100 core and niche databases in the area of life sciences, including for example Embase and PsycINFO. Web of Science finally comprises some journals missed by PubMed and Embase.
References
Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health (London). 2013;1(5):e259–e281.
Larsen LP, Biering K, Johnsen SP, Andersen G, Hjollund NH. Self-rated health and return to work after first-time stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(4):339–345.
Chang WH, Sohn MK, Lee J, Kim DY, Lee SG, Shin YI, et al. Return to work after stroke: The KOSCO Study. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(3):273–279.
Maaijwee NA, Rutten-Jacobs LC, Arntz RM, Schaapsmeerders P, Schoonderwaldt HC, van Dijk EJ, et al. Long-term increased risk of unemployment after young stroke: a long-term follow-up study. Neurology. 2014;83(13):1132–1138.
Wang YC, Kapellusch J, Garg A. Important factors influencing the return to work after stroke. Work. 2014;47(4):553–559.
Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1397–1403.
Baldwin C, Brusco NK. The effect of vocational rehabilitation on return-to-work rates post stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(5):562–572.
Mohammed MA, Moles RJ, Chen TF. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):695–704.
Ring N, Jepson R, Ritchie K. Methods of synthesizing qualitative research studies for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):384–390.
Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, Daker-White G, Britten N, Pill R, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(43):1–164.
Rice MJ. Evidence-based practice in psychiatric and mental health nursing: qualitative meta-synthesis. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2008;14(5):382–385.
Tomlin G, Borgetto B. Research Pyramid: a new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(2):189–196.
France EF, Ring N, Thomas R, Noyes J, Maxwell M, Jepson R. A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:119.
Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Herbert D, Phan S, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–670.
Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):93–104.
Banning M. Employment and breast cancer: a meta-ethnography. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(6):708–719.
MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–269.
Fossey E, Harvey C. Finding and sustaining employment: a qualitative meta-synthesis of mental health consumer views. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77(5):303–314.
Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, et al. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(6):1208–1219.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). CASP Qualitative Research Checklist. 2014. http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_29c5b002d99342f788c6ac670e49f274. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.
Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(4):365–371.
Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. London: Sage; 1988.
Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967.
Meier P. Mind-mapping: a tool for eliciting and representing knowledge held by diverse informants. Soc Res Update. 2007;52:1–4.
Jackson K, Trochim W. Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organ Res Meth. 2002;5(4):307–336.
Corr S, Wilmer S. Returning to work after a stroke: an important but neglected area. Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66(5):186–192.
Lock S, Jordan L, Bryan K, Maxim J. Work after stroke: focusing on barriers and enablers. Disabil Soc. 2005;20(1):33–47.
Koch L, Egbert N, Coeling H, Ayers D. Returning to work after the onset of illness: Experiences of right hemisphere stroke survivors. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2005;48(4):209–218.
Medin J, Barajas J, Ekberg K. Stroke patients’ experiences of return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(17):1051–1060.
Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: Survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1858–1869.
Gilworth G, Phil M, Cert A, Sansam KA, Kent RM. Personal experiences of returning to work following stroke: an exploratory study. Work. 2009;34(1):95–103.
Culler KH, Wang YC, Byers K, Trierweiler R. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):325–340.
Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R, Bode R. Critical factors related to return to work after stroke: a qualitative study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):341–351.
Morris J, Franklin S, Menger F GD. Returning to work with aphasia: a case study. Aphasiology. 2011;25(8):890–907.
Wolfenden B, Grace M. Identity continuity in the face of biographical disruption: ‘It’s the same me’. Brain Impair. 2012;13(2):203–211.
Gustafsson L, Turpin M. Analysis of one stroke survivor’s transition into vocational experiences. Brain Impair. 2012;13(1):99–107.
Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):406–418.
Vestling M, Ramel E, Iwarsson S. Thoughts and experiences from returning to work after stroke. Work. 2013;45(2):201–211.
Sinclair E, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Developing stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation: a soft systems analysis of current service provision. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):409–417.
Shaw WS, van der Windt DA, Main CJ, Loisel P, Linton SJ. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“Blue Flags”) in back disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):64–80.
Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524.
Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):415–437.
Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(S11):2151–2159.
Schultz I, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–352.
de Boer AG, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MH, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;25(9):CD007569.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Hees HL, Verhoeven AC, et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3(12):CD006237.
van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, Franche RL, Boot CR, Anema JR. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5(10):CD006955.
Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.
Funding
The study was funded partially by the non-profit foundation Schmieder for Sciences and Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwarz, B., Claros-Salinas, D. & Streibelt, M. Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research on Facilitators and Barriers of Return to Work After Stroke. J Occup Rehabil 28, 28–44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9713-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9713-2