Skip to main content
Log in

Sublexical and Lexical Influences on Gender Assignment in French

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments showed that French native speakers rely on sublexical and lexical cues to allocate gender during word recognition. Sublexical cues were based on whether the word ending was typical for a particular gender rather than neutral with regard to gender. Lexical cues were based on whether the associated definite article was informative (for words beginning with a consonant) or uninformative (for words beginning with a vowel). Classification of single nouns and verification of grammatical combinations of indefinite article and noun led to longer times when both sublexical and lexical cues were uninformative compared with when one or both cues were informative. Verification of ungrammatical combinations of indefinite article and noun yielded separate effects of both cues, though only when monitoring for both semantic and syntactic unacceptability in meaningful phrases did people attend to both cues independently. It was argued that people became more cautious in their gender assignments as task requirements became “deeper”. If strategic changes as a function of task demands are incorporated, the results are compatible with connectionist models proposing that gender decisions are computed from strength of past associations of the word and gender-specifying elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., & Zanuttini, R. (1995). The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 57, 193-216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D'Amico, S., & Hernandez, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 847-862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801-820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1992). Representation and processing of morphological information. In R. Frost, & L. Katz (Eds.), Phonology, Orthography, Morphology and Meaning (pp. 377-388). North Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the 'tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex: Une base de donn´ees lexicales informatis ´ee pour le franc¸ais ´ecrit et parl´e. L'Ann´ee Psychologique, 90, 551-566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A., & Brabant, M. (1995). Interaction entre facteurs phonologiques et s´emantiques dans une ´epreuve de cat´egorisation lexicale. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 49, 240-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A., & Paivio, A. (1990). Le phon'eme initial des noms inanim´es et son effet sur l'identification du genre grammatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 44, 44-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A., Paivio, A., & Desrochers, S. (1989). L'effet de la fr´equence d'usage des noms inanim´es et de la valeur pr´edictive de leur terminasion sur l'identification du genre grammatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 43, 62-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand, L. (2001). Grammatical gender is also on the tip of French tongues. Current Psychology Letters, 5, 7-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (1990). Users' Guide to the DMASTR Display System: Laboratory Software for Mental Chronometry. Tucson, AZ: Arizona.

  • Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2002). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Survey of Linguistics, Vol. III: Biological and Psychological Aspects of Language (pp. 69-96). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1992). Disorders of lexical selection. Cognition, 42, 143-180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, T. H., & Frost, R. (2001). Two routes to grammatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 627-651.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henaff Gonon, M., Bruckert, R., & Michel, F. (1989). Lexicalization in an anomic patient. Neuropsychologia, 27, 391-407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V. M., & Dejean de la Batie, B. (1999). Assignment of grammatical gender by native speakers and foreign learners of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 479-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V. M., & O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Reading derivationally affixed French words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 163-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 13464-13471.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-thetongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1410-1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radeau, M., & van Berkum, J. J. A. (1996). Gender decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 605-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolik, M. E., & Smith, M. E. (1992). Assignment of gender to French nouns in primary and secondary language: A connectionist model. Second Language Research, 8, 39-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Meunier, F. (1998). Lexical representation of gender: A quasi-regular domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 23-45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., & Rigault, A. (1977). The French Speaker's Skill with Grammatical Gender: An Example of Rule-Governed Behavior. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., Rigault, A., & Sigalowitz, N. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speakers' skill with grammatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 312-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 ms. Science, 280, 572-574.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314-317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, V.M., Segui, J. Sublexical and Lexical Influences on Gender Assignment in French. J Psycholinguist Res 33, 425–457 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-004-2665-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-004-2665-7

Navigation