Skip to main content
Log in

Assigning Grammatical Gender During Word Production

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was designed to examine the processes by which grammatical gender is assigned during word production. French words varied in strength of sublexical cues, based on whether the word ending was typical for one gender rather than neutral about gender, and lexical cues, derived from the associated definite article being uninformative about gender for words beginning with a vowel, but informative for words beginning with a consonant. In Experiment 1, when native French speakers classified the gender of mentally evoked names of pictures, no effects of these cues were obtained. Experiment 2 used an improved methodology, with participants classifying the gender of words translated from English. English-speaking learners of French were influenced strongly by lexical and sublexical cues, while French speakers showed a weaker influence. However, for both speaker groups, words whose gender was classified slowly during recognition were also classified slowly during production, and error rates were similarly correlated across tasks. The conclusion was that gender is not equally available for all words once the associated “lemma” is accessed. Current models of language production may have to incorporate mechanisms allowing differential speed of access to gender information depending on a word’s formal properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alario F.-X., Ferrand L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms of name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31:531–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Alario, F.,-X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (In press) Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.

  • Badecker W., Miozzo M., Zanuttini R. (1995). The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition 57:193–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates E., Devescovi A., Pizzamiglio L. D’Amico S., Hernandez A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics 57:847–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciari C., Cubelli R. (2003). The neuropsychology of grammatical gender: An introduction. Cortex 39:377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza A., Miozzo M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the ‘tip-of-the-tongue’ phenomenon. Cognition 64:309–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Content A., Mousty P., Radeau M. (1990). Brulex: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L’Année Psychologique 90:551–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett G.G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Damian M.F., Bowers J.S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language 49:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell G.S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93:283–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers A., Brabant M. (1995). Interaction entre facteurs phonologiques et sémantiques dans une épreuve de catégorisation lexicale. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 49:240–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers A., Paivio A. (1990). Le phonème initial des noms inanimés et son effet sur l’identification du genre grammatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 44:44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers A., Paivio A., Desrochers S. (1989). L’effet de la fréquence d’usage des noms inanimés et de la valeur prédictive de leur terminasion sur l’identification du genre grammatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 43:62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand L. (2001). Grammatical gender is also on the tip of French tongues. Current Psychology Letters 5:7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster K.I., Forster J.C. (2002). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 35:116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici A.D., Jacobsen T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28:467–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett M.F. (1988). Processes in language production. In: Newmeyer F.J. (eds). The Cambridge Survey of Linguistics, Vol III: Biological and Psychological Aspects of Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett M.F. (1992). Disorders of lexical selection. Cognition 42:143–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henaff Gonon M., Bruckert R., Michel F. (1989). Lexicalization in an anomic patient. Neuropsychologia 27:391–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes V.M., Dejean de la Bâtie B. (1999). Assignment of grammatical gender by native speakers and foreign learners of French. Applied Psycholinguistics 20:479–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V. M., & Segui, J. (2004). Sublexical and lexical influences on gender assignment in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

  • Levelt W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt W.J.M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3:223–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt W.J.M. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America 98:13464–13471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo M., Caramazza A. (1997). Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23:1410–1423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo M., Caramazza A. (1999). The selection of derterminers in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25:907–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schriefers H., Jescheniak J.D. (1999). Representation and processing grammatical gender in language production: A review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28:467–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolik M.E., Smith M.E. (1992). Assignment of gender to French nouns in primary and secondary language: A connectionist model. Second Language Research 8:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M., Meunier F. (1998). Lexical representation of gender: A quasi-regular domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27:23–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Turennout M., Hagoort P., Brown C.M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 ms. Science 280:572–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco G., Antonini T., Garrett M.F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science 8:314–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco G., Lauer M., Damian M.F., Levelt W.J.M. (2002). Syntactic and semantic forces in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28:46–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia M. Holmes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, V.M., Segui, J. Assigning Grammatical Gender During Word Production. J Psycholinguist Res 35, 5–30 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-9001-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-9001-8

Keywords

Navigation