Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the f parameter for k 0-neutron activation analysis at the Australian 20 MW OPAL research reactor

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the k 0 method of standardisation in neutron activation analysis (k 0-NAA), the ratio of thermal to epithermal neutrons, a value known as f, is fundamental in accurately determining the concentration of elements within the sample. Research into determining this f value via the cadmium ratio method was undertaken for two positions within the 20 MW Open Pool Australian Light water (OPAL) research reactor (Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia). A short irradiation and long irradiation position were assessed via two methods; the conventional cadmium ratio method based on the Høgdahl formalism, with f values of 2,666 ± 255 and 1,538 ± 258 being calculated respectively for the short and long positions, and an ASTM-INVAP-based cadmium ratio method, which allows for the higher neutron temperature of OPAL to be accounted for, with f values of 3,057 ± 318 and 1,755 ± 312 being calculated respectively. These values were validated by analysis of NIST standard reference materials (SRM™), with good agreement between experimental values and reference and literature values being observed, showing the accuracy and suitability of these values for OPAL. Additionally, the high values of f shown endorse the strength of performing k 0-NAA at OPAL. This manuscript publishes the first values of f from OPAL and provides a detailed description of the method employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Corte F, Simonits A, Hoste J (1975) Single comparator methods in reactor neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 24:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simonits A, De Corte F, Hoste J (1976) Zirconium as a multi-isotopic flux ratio monitor and a single comparator in reactor-neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Chem 31:467–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg RR, Bode P, De Nadai Fernandes EA (2011) Neutron activation analysis: a primary method of measurement. Spectrochim Acta Part B 66(3–4):193–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett JW (2008) Commissioning of NAA at the new OPAL reactor in Australia. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278(3):671–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramakrishna VVS, Acharya RN, Reddy AVR, Garg AN (2001) Use of gold as monostandard for the determination of elemental concentrations in environmental SRMs and Ganga river sediments by the k 0 method. Appl Radiat Isot 55(4):595–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Corte F, Simonits A, Hoste J, De Wispelaere A (1987) Accuracy and applicability of the k 0-standardization method. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 113:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brockman JD, Peters NJ, Roberson JD (2009) Variation in k 0 neutron flux parameters after replacement of the beryllium reflector and graphite wedge at the University of Missouri Research Reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:41–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alghem L, Ramdhane M, Khaled S, Akhal T (2006) The development and application of k 0-standardization method of neutron activation analysis at Es-Salam research reactor. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 556(1):386–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thermal neutron flux measurement by activation analysis-comm. procedure; 10 Annex 1: The Cadmium Difference Method (2006) Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation/INVAP

  10. E262-03 Standard test method for determining thermal neutron reaction and fluence rates by radioactivation techniques. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International

  11. Chilian C, Chambon R, Kennedy G (2010) Neutron self-shielding with k 0-NAA irradiations. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 622(2):429–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trkov A, Zerovnik G, Snoj L, Ravnik M (2009) On the self-shielding factors in neutron activation analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 610(2):553–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tables for Neutron Activation Analysis. (2006) Columbia

  14. Ehmann WD, Vance DE (1991) Radiochemistry and nuclear methods of analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Certified Reference Material IRMM-530RC Certificate of Analysis (2008) Institue for Reference Materials and Measurements

  16. Kucera J, De Corte F, Simonits A, Bellemans F (1997) In: Proceedings of the 2nd International k 0 Users Workshop Ljubljana, Slovenia, p 15

  17. Certificate of Analysis AU005137/14 (2011) Goodfellow Cambridge Limited

  18. Cadmium Shielding Products. (2008) Shieldwerx™, 4135 Jackie Rd, Rio Rancho, New Mexico, USA. http://www.shieldwerx.com/cadmium.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2012

  19. HyperLab (2009) HyperLab Software. Budapest, Hungary

  20. McGarry ED (1964) Measurements of the resonance neutron self-shielding in gold wires. Trans Am Nucl Soc 7:86

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kayzero for Windows for reactor neutron activation analysis (NAA) using k 0 standardization method, Version 2 Users Manual (2005) DSM Research R94-11492, Geleen, The Netherlands

  22. De Bièvre P, Günzler H (2005) Traceability in chemical measurement. Springer, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Bennett JW, Grave P, Stopic AJ (2012) Establishing a basis for nuclear archaeometry in Australia using the 20 MW OPAL research reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:13–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Akaho EHK, Nyarko BJB (2002) Characterization of neutron flux spectra in irradiation sites of MNSR reactor using the Westcott-formalism for the k 0 neutron activation analysis method. Appl Radiat Isot 57(2):265–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barbos D, Paunoiu C, Roth C (2010) Determination of a and f parameters at the 14-MW TRIGA reactor at Pitesti, Romania. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 622(2):425–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brockman JD, Robertson JD (2009) Analysis of k 0 neutron activation analysis at the University of Missouri Research Reactor. Appl Radiat Isot 67(6):1084–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank J.W. Bennett and A. Stopic from the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) for their extensive help on this project. This research was funded by an Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (AINSE) grant 11/012. R. Popelka-Filcoff acknowledges the Australian Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering (AINSE) Fellowship. R. Murrie acknowledges the Defence Scholarship from the Department of Further Education, Employment, Science and Technology of the Government of South Australia, and the Max and Bette Mendelson Foundation Scholarship from the City of West Torrens Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Popelka-Filcoff.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 164 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murrie, R.P., Quinton, J.S. & Popelka-Filcoff, R.S. Determination of the f parameter for k 0-neutron activation analysis at the Australian 20 MW OPAL research reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298, 77–86 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2542-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2542-7

Keywords

Navigation