Abstract
Over the past decade, the urban–rural gradient approach has been effectively used to study the ecology of cities and towns around the world. These studies have focused on understanding the distribution of plants and animals as well as ecosystem processes along gradients of urbanization that run from densely urbanized inner city to more rural exurban environments. We reviewed 300 papers investigating urbanization gradients that were published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and May 2007. Sixty-three percent of the papers investigated the distribution of organisms along urbanization gradients. Only five papers addressed the measures used to quantify the urbanization gradient itself. Within the papers addressing the distribution of organisms, 49% investigated the responses of birds to urbanization gradients, and <10% of the papers investigated more cryptic organisms. Most of these studies utilized a variety of broad measures of urbanization, but future advances in the field will require the development of some standardized broad measures to facilitate comparisons between cities. More specific measures of urbanization can be used to gain a mechanistic understanding of species and ecosystem responses to urbanization gradients. While the gradient approach has made a significant contribution to our understanding of the ecology of cities and towns, there is now a need to address our current knowledge gaps so that the field can reach its full potential. We present two examples of research questions that demonstrate how we can enhance our understanding of urbanization gradients, and the ecological knowledge that we can obtain from them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology: integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. Springer, New York
Alberti M, Botsford E, Cohen A (2001) Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, pp 89–115
Allen AP, O’Connor RJ (2000) Interactive effects of land use and other factors on regional bird distributions. J Biogeogr 27:889–900. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00453.x
Allen TFH, Wyleto EP (1983) A hierarchical model for the complexity of plant communities. J Theor Biol 101:529–540. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(83)90014-0
Allen EB, Temple PJ, Bytnerowicz A, Arbaugh MJ, Sirulnik AG, Rao LE (2007) Patterns of understory diversity in mixed coniferous forests of southern California impacted by air pollution. Sci World J 7:247–263. doi:10.1100/tsw.2007.72
Avondet JL, Blair RB, Berg DJ, Ebbert MA (2003) Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) response to changes in ecological parameters across an urban gradient. Environ Entomol 32:347–358
Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519. doi:10.2307/2269387
Blair RB (2004) The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecol Soc 9:2
Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00056-0
Bowers MA, Breland B (1996) Foraging of gray squirrels on an urban-rural gradient: use of the GUD to assess anthropogenic impact. Ecol Appl 6:1135–1142. doi:10.2307/2269597
Burton ML, Samuelson LJ, Pan S (2005) Riparian woody plant diversity and forest structure along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 8:93–106. doi:10.1007/s11252-005-1421-6
Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Schwarz K (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front Ecol Environ 5:80–88. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[80:SHIUER]2.0.CO;2
Carreiro MM, Howe K, Parkhurst DF, Pouyat RV (1999) Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban–rural gradient. Biol Fertil Soils 30:258–268. doi:10.1007/s003740050617
Chapman KA, Reich PB (2007) Land use and habitat gradients determine bird community diversity and abundance in suburban, rural and reserve landscapes of Minnesota, USA. Biol Conserv 135:527. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.050
Clergeau P, Jokimäki J, Snep R (2006) Using hierarchical levels for urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:660–661. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.006
Collins JP, Kinzig A, Grimm NB, Fagan WF, Hope D, Wu J et al (2000) A new urban ecology. Am Sci 88:416–425. doi:10.1511/2000.5.416
Cousins JR, Hope D, Gries C, Stutz JC (2003) Preliminary assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure in an urban ecosystem. Mycorrhiza 13:319–326. doi:10.1007/s00572-003-0239-4
De Clercq EM, De Wulf R, Van Herzele A (2007) Relating spatial pattern of forest cover to accessibility. Landsc Urban Plan 80:14–22. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.007
Dow K (2002) Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosyst 4:255–275. doi:10.1023/A:1015767231137
Faeth SH, Warren PS, Shochat E, Marussich WA (2005) Trophic dynamics in urban communities. Bioscience 55:399–407. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0399:TDIUC]2.0.CO;2
Fraker ME, Snodgrass JW, Morgan F (2002) Differences in growth and maturation of blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus) across an urban–rural gradient. Copeia 2002:1122–1127. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[1122:DIGAMO]2.0.CO;2
Germaine SS, Wakeling BF (2001) Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Biol Conserv 97:229–237. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00115-4
Gilbert OL (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, London
Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26. doi:10.2307/2479933
Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CA (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
Groffman PM, Pouyat RV, Cadenasso ML, Zipperer WC, Szlavecz K, Yesilonis ID et al (2006) Land use context and natural soil controls on plant community composition and soil nitrogen and carbon dynamics in urban and rural forests. For Ecol Manage 236:177–192. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.002
Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ (2006) Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne’s urban–rural gradient. Landsc Urban Plan 78:435–448. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.005
Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ (2007) Composition of the plant community in remnant patches of grassy woodland along an urban-rural gradient in Melbourne, Australia. Urban Ecosyst 10:355–377. doi:10.1007/s11252-007-0034-7
Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PH et al (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15:1893–1905. doi:10.1890/05-5221
Herzog F, Lausch A (2001) Supplementing land-use statistics with landscape metrics: some methodological considerations. Environ Monit Assess 72:37–50. doi:10.1023/A:1011949704308
Holland KD, McDonnell MJ, Williams NSG (2007) The potential impact of mollusk herbivory on native grasslands in Victoria, Australia. Aust Ecol 32:626–634
Hope D, Gries C, Zhu WX, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB et al (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8788–8792. doi:10.1073/pnas.1537557100
Hope D, Zhu W, Gries C, Oleson J, Kaye J, Grimm N et al (2005) Spatial variation in soil inorganic nitrogen across an arid urban ecosystem. Urban Ecosyst 8:251–273. doi:10.1007/s11252-005-3261-9
Howe HL, Katterhagen JG, Yates J, Lehnherr M (1992) Urban–rural differences in the management of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 3:533–539. doi:10.1007/BF00052750
Jenerette GD, Wu JG, Grimm NB, Hope D (2006) Points, patches, and regions: scaling soil biogeochemical patterns in an urbanized arid ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 12:1532–1544. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01182.x
Jerzak L (2001) Synurbanization of the magpie in the Palearctic. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp 403–425
Kinzig AP, Grove JM (2001) Urban-suburban ecology. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 733–745
Koenig J, Shine R, Shea G (2001) The ecology of an Australian reptile icon: how do blue-tongued lizards (Tiliqua scincoides) survive in suburbia? Wildl Res 28:215–227. doi:10.1071/WR00068
Kong F, Nakagoshi N (2006) Spatial–temporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Landsc Urban Plan 78:147–164. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.006
Limberg KE, Schmidt RE (1990) Patterns of fish spawning in Hudson River tributaries: response to an urban gradient? Ecology 71:1238–1245. doi:10.2307/1938260
Lovett GM, Traynor MM, Pouyat RV, Carreiro MM, Zhu WX, Baxter JW (2000) Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban–rural gradient. Environ Sci Technol 34:4294–4300. doi:10.1021/es001077q
Luck M, Wu J (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landsc Ecol 17:327–339. doi:10.1023/A:1020512723753
Luck MA, Jenerette GD, Wu JG, Grimm NB (2001) The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint. Ecosystems 4:782–796. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0046-8 (NY, Print)
Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp 19–47
Marzluff JM (2005) Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 8:157–177. doi:10.1007/s11252-005-4378-6
Marzluff JM, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restor Ecol 9:280–292. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003280.x
Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms, and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp 1–17
McCarthy MA (2007) Bayesian methods for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237. doi:10.2307/1938259
McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Pouyat RV (1993) The application of the ecological gradient paradigm to the study of urban effects. In: McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (eds) Humans as components of ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 175–189
McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC et al (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36. doi:10.1023/A:1014359024275
McIntyre NE, Knowles-Yanez K, Hope D (2000) Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosyst 4:5–24. doi:10.1023/A:1009540018553
McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2
McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
Natuhara Y, Imai C (1999) Prediction of species richness of breeding birds by landscape-level factors of urban woods in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Biodivers Conserv 8:239–253. doi:10.1023/A:1008869410668
Niemelä J (1999) Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosyst 3:57–65. doi:10.1023/A:1009595932440
Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence J et al (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban–rural gradients: an international comparison. Landsc Ecol 17:387–401. doi:10.1023/A:1021270121630
Odell EA, Knight RL (2001) Songbird and medium-sized mammal communities associated with exurban development in Pitkin County, Colorado. Conserv Biol 15:1143–1150. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041143.x
Ourso RT, Frenzel SA (2003) Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska. Hydrobiologia 501:117–131. doi:10.1023/A:1026211808745
Parris KM (2006) Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. J Anim Ecol 75:757–764. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01096.x
Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2006) Advancing urban ecological studies: frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore ecosystem study. Aust Ecol 31:114–125. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01586.x
Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC et al (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
Piel F, Gilbert M, Franklin A, Gregoire JC (2005) Occurrence of Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae) along an urbanization gradient in Brussels, Belgium. Agric For Entomol 7:161–167
Pouyat RV, McDonnell MJ (1991) Heavy-metal accumulations in forest soils along an urban-rural gradient in southeastern New York, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut 57–58:797–807. doi:10.1007/BF00282943
Pouyat RV, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM (1994) Environmental effects of forest soil-invertebrate and fungal densities in oak stands along an urban-rural land-use gradient. Pedobiologia (Jena) 38:385–399
Sadler JP, Small EC, Fiszpan H, Telfer MG, Niemelä J (2006) Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban–rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. J Biogeogr 33:1126–1138. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01476.x
Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.019
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc B 64:583–639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353
Steinberg DA, Pouyat RV, Parmelee RW, Groffman PM (1997) Earthworm abundance and nitrogen mineralization rates along an urban–rural land use gradient. Soil Biol Biochem 29:427–430. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00043-0
Sukopp H (1998) Urban ecology: scientific and practical aspects. In: Breuste J, Feldmann H, Uhlmann O (eds) Urban ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 3–16
Szlavecz K, Placella SA, Pouyat RV, Groffman PM, Csuzdi C, Yesilonis I (2006) Invasive earthworm species and nitrogen cycling in remnant forest patches. Appl Soil Ecol 32:54–62. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.01.006
ter Braak CJF, Prentice IC (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv Ecol Res 18:271–317. doi:10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60183-X
Theobald DM (2004) Placing exurban land-use change in a human modification framework. Front Ecol Environ 2:139–144
Vilisics F, Elek Z, Lövei GL, Hornung E (2007) Composition of terrestrial isopod assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. Pedobiologia (Jena) 51:45–53. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2006.12.004
Walsh CJ (2006) Biological indicators of stream health using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: a comparison of sensitivity to an urban gradient. Mar Freshw Res 57:37–47. doi:10.1071/MF05041
Weeks JR, Larson D, Rashed T (2003) Contrast or continuum? The creation and application of an urban gradient index using remotely sensed imagery and GIS. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the population association of America, Minneapolis, pp 1–44
Whittaker RH (1967) Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol Rev Cambr Philos Soc 49:207–264. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1967.tb01419.x
Williams NSG, Morgan JW, McDonnell MJ, McCarthy MA (2005) Plant traits and local extinctions in natural grasslands along an urban-rural gradient. J Ecol 93:1203–1213. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01039.x
Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landsc Ecol 19:125–138. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae
Zhu WX, Carreiro MA (2004) Temporal and spatial variations in nitrogen transformations in deciduous forest ecosystems along an urban–rural gradient. Soil Biol Biochem 36:267–278. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.09.013
Zipperer WC, Wu JG, Pouyat RV, Pickett STA (2000) The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecol Appl 10:685–688. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0685:TAOEPT]2.0.CO;2
Ziska LH, George K (2007) Establishment and persistence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) in disturbed soil as a function of an urban–rural macro-environment. Glob Change Biol 13:266–274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01264.x
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Kelly Holland for her assistance in compiling the database on studies employing the urban-rural gradient approach. Rodney van der Ree, Ben Hamilton and Lauren Keim were instrumental in collecting the vegetation data. We would also like to thank Mick McCarthy and Kirsten Parris for their assistance with the Bayesian analysis. This manuscript was improved by comments from Zoë Smith, Julia Stammers, Briony Norton, Margaret Carreiro, Nancy McIntyre, Jari Niemelä and an anonymous reviewer. The Baker Foundation provided generous support for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonnell, M.J., Hahs, A.K. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landscape Ecol 23, 1143–1155 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4