Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patterns in bat functional guilds across multiple urban centres in south-eastern Australia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the impacts of landscape change on species behaviour is a major challenge in landscape ecology. A focus on the functional traits of species may improve this understanding if species with similar traits (functional guilds) are impacted by landscape change in similar ways, but this idea has not been widely tested on bat communities in urban landscapes. We examined changes in bat species richness and the activity level of species in different functional guilds within 72 residential neighbourhoods across 18 towns and cities spanning over 250,000 square km in south-eastern Australia. Species richness increased close to native vegetation, declined with increasing urbanization, and had a hump-shaped relationship with neighbourhood vegetation cover. Also, the activity level of all bat species combined peaked at mid-range values of neighbourhood vegetation cover. The activity of species in the open-adapted guild was not strongly related to any urban characteristic, but our results concur with previous findings that the activity of most open-adapted species does not appear to be negatively impacted by urbanization. Conversely, clutter-adapted species appear more sensitive to urbanization and their activity level was negatively related to urban intensity and increased closer to native vegetation, consistent with previous studies. The functional-trait approach may improve the capacity to make generalisations across different landscape contexts for clutter-adapted and open-adapted guilds, but is currently hampered for other bat species owing to variation in the behaviour of different species assigned to the same functional guild, and a lack of ecological knowledge regarding the impacts of different types of landscape change on particular species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams MD, Law BS, Gibson MS (2010) Reliable automation of bat call identification for eastern New South Wales, Australia, using classification trees and AnaScheme software. Acta Chiropterologica 12:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge HDJN, Rautenbach IL (1987) Morphology, echolocation and resource partitioning in insectivorous bats. J Anim Ecol 56:763–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlettaz R (1999) Habitat selection as a major resource partitioning mechanism between the two sympatric sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. J Anim Ecol 68:460–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avila-Flores R, Fenton B (2005) Use of spatial features by foraging insectivorous bats in a large urban landscape. J Mammal 86:1193–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basham R, Law B, Banks P (2011) Microbats in a ‘leafy’ urban landscape: are they persisting, and what factors influence their presence? Austral Ecol 36:663–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Best NG, Cowles MK, Vines SK (1995) CODA: convergence diagnostics and output analysis software for Gibbs sampling output. Version 0.3. MRC Biostatistic Unit, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake D, Hutson AM, Racey PA, Rydell J, Speakman JR (1994) Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England. J Zool (London) 234:453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SP, Gelman A (1998) Alternative methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat 7:434–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JL, Barclay RMR (2011) Influence of urbanization on demography of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) in the prairies of North America. PLoS ONE 6(5):e20483. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115:451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchamp J, Swihart R (2008) Shifts in bat community structure related to evolved traits and features of human-altered landscapes. Landscape Ecol 23:849–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchamp JE, Sparks DW, Whitaker JO Jr (2004) Foraging-habitat selection by bats at an urban-rural interface: comparison between a successful and a less successful species. Can J Zool 82:1157–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeis G (2006) Artificial night lighting and insects: attraction of insects to streetlamps in a rural setting in Germany. In: Rich C, Longcore T (eds) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington, pp 281–304

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (Environmental Systems Resource Institute) (2009) ArcMap 931. ESRI, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Stott J, Law BS, Adams MD, Forrester RI (2009) Designing effective habitat studies: quantifying multiple sources of variability in bat activity. Acta Chiropterologica 11:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (ed) (2010) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrt SD, Chelsvig JE (2003) Bat activity in an urban landscape: patterns at the landscape and microhabitat scale. Ecol Appl 13:939–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germaine SS, Wakeling BF (2001) Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Biol Conserv 97:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson M, Lumsden L (2003) The AnaScheme automated bat call identification system. Australas Bat Soc Newslett 20:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanspach J, Fischer J, Stagoll K, Stott J, Law B (2012) Using trait-based filtering as a predictive framework for conservation: a case study of bats on farms in southeastern Australia. J Appl Ecol 49:842–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JP (1997) Temporal variation in activity of bats and the design of echolocation-monitoring studies. J Mammal 78:514–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey MBC, Acharya L, Pennington S (1996) Resource partitioning by two species of vespertilionid bats (Lasiurus cinereus and Lasiurus borealis) feeding around street lights. J Mammal 77:325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan CL, Caterall CP, Jones D, Rhodes M (2006) The structure of a micro-bat community in relation to gradients of environmental variation in a tropical urban area. Urban Ecosyst 9:67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan CL, Catterall CP, Jones D, Rhodes M (2010) The diversity of insectivorous bat assemblages among habitats within a subtropical urban landscape. Austral Ecol 35:849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz TH, Lumsden LF (2003) Ecology of cavity and foliage roosting bats. In: Kunz TH, Fenton B (eds) Bat ecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Law BS, Chidel M (2002) Tracks and riparian zones facilitate the use of Australian regrowth forest by insectivorous bats. J Appl Ecol 39:605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law BS, Chidel M (2006) Eucalypt plantings on farms: use by insectivorous bats. Biol Conserv 133:236–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law BS, Anderson J, Chidel M (1999) Bat communities in a fragmented forest landscape on the south-west slopes of New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 88:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law BS, Reinhold L, Pennay M (2002) Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of Vespadelus spp. (Vespertilionidae) from New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Acta Chiropterologica 4:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesiński G, Fuszara E, Kowalski M (2000) Foraging areas and relative density of bats (Chiroptera) in differently human transformed landscapes. Int J Mammalian Biol 65:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Link WA, Barker RJ (2010) Bayesian inference with ecological applications. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd A, Law B, Goldingay R (2006) Bat activity on riparian zones and upper slopes in Australian timber production forests and the effectiveness of riparian buffers. Biol Conserv 129:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT (2011) The impact of urbanization on taxonomic and functional similarity among bird communities. J Biogeogr 38:894–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT, O’Brien R (2009) Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosystems 12:604–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations between urban bird and plant communities, human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 25:816–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Lumb K (2012a) Improving the application of vertebrate trait- based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. J Anim Ecol 81:1065–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Smallbone LT, Sheffield KJ (2012b) Environmental and socio-economic factors related to urban bird communities. Austral Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02383.x

  • Lumsden LF, Bennett AF (2005) Scattered trees in rural landscapes: foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 122:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden LF, Bennett AF, Silins JE (2002) Location of roosts of the lesser long-eared bat Nyctophilus geoffroyi and Gould’s wattled bat Chalinolobus gouldii in a fragmented landscape in south-eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 106:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff J (2005) Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 8:157–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MA (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre NE (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:825–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre S, Barrett GW (1992) Habitat variegation, an alternative to fragmentation. Conserv Biol 6:146–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubaum NJ, Wilson KR, O’Shea TJ (2007) Urban maternity-roost selection by big brown bats in Colorado. J Wildl Manag 71:728–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence J, Hartley D, de Oca EM (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landscape Ecol 17:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg UM, Rayner JMV (1987) Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera): wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 316:335–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Rhodes M, Catterall C (2008) Spatial foraging behavior and use of an urban landscape by a fast-flying bat, the molossid Tadarida australis. J Mammal 89:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J (1992) Exploitation of insects around streetlamps by bats in Sweden. Funct Ecol 6:744–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J, Racey PA (1995) Street lamps and the feeding ecology of insectivorous bats. Symp Zool Soc Lond 67:291–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders MB, Barclay RMR (1992) Ecomorphology of insectivorous bats: a test of predictions using two morphologically similar species. Ecology 73:1335–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon AT, Petit S (2008) Effects of site, time, weather, and light on urban bat activity and richness: considerations for survey effort. Wildl Res 35:821–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub A, Ostwald J, Siemers BM (2008) Foraging bats avoid noise. J Exp Biol 211:3174–3180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U, Kalko EKV (2001) Echolocation by insect-eating bats. Bioscience 51:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Dayan T (1991) The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone EL, Jones G, Harris S (2009) Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Curr Biol 19:1123–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone EL, Jones G, Harris S (2012) Conserving energy at a cost to biodiversity? Impacts of LED lighting on bats. Glob Change Biol 18:2458–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Threlfall C, Law B, Penman T, Banks PB (2011) Ecological processes in urban landscapes: mechanisms influencing the distribution and activity of insectivorous bats. Ecography 34:814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Threlfall C, Law B, Penman T, Banks PB (2012) Sensitivity of insectivorous bats to urbanization: implications for suburban conservation planning. Biol Conserv 146:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010) World urbanization prospects the 2009 revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ree R, McCarthy MA (2005) Inferring persistence of indigenous mammals in response to urbanisation. Anim Conserv 8:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Leno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP0770261) to GWL. We thank Matt Gibson for developing Anascheme, Lindy Lumsden for identifying bat calls in Victorian towns, Kathryn Sheffield for conducting the remote sensing analysis, Mick McCarthy and Brendan Wintle for assistance with the Bayesian analysis, two referees for constructive comments on drafts of the manuscript, and the local governments and residents of all towns for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary W. Luck.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luck, G.W., Smallbone, L., Threlfall, C. et al. Patterns in bat functional guilds across multiple urban centres in south-eastern Australia. Landscape Ecol 28, 455–469 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9842-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9842-0

Keywords

Navigation