Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors influencing early adolescents’ mathematics achievement: High-quality teaching rather than relationships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used data from the Assessment Tools for Teaching and Learning project, which involved data on the academic performance of more than 90,000 New Zealand students in six subjects (i.e. reading, writing and mathematics in two languages). Two sub-samples of this dataset were included for detailed re-analysis to test the general applicability of the Australian model of Quality of School Life (Ainley et al. 1986) in the New Zealand context. The first sample comprised 336 year 8 students from elementary schools and the second sample consisted of 272 year 10 students from high schools. Furthermore, two structural equation models were developed and tested, expressing relationships between students’ quality of school life perceptions, students’ attitudes to mathematics, and their effects on mathematics achievement. The quality of school life questionnaires scales [Ainley and Bourke, in Res Pap Educ 7(2):107–128, 1992] were used as indicators of students’ perceptions regarding learning, teachers and peer relationships. The model proposed that perceived quality of school life would affect students’ attitudes of liking and confidence in mathematics, which would in turn affect their academic performance. After controlling for other variables in the model, students’ perception about their self-efficacy to learn mathematics was more directly related to outcomes than to perceptions of teacher quality or peer involvement. Data analyses revealed no apparent relationships of these factors to mathematics achievement. Moreover, results for both samples led to the conclusion that the perceived quality of learning is connected with ‘confidence in’ and ‘liking mathematics’, which in turn predict students’ mathematics achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, J. (1999, July). Schools and the social development of young Australians: Frameworks, outcomes and influences. Paper presented at the National Social Outcomes of Schooling Forum organized by the Performance Measurement and Review Branch, Education Queensland, Surfers Paradise, Australia.

  • Ainley, J., & Bourke, S. F. (1992). Student views of primary schooling. Research Papers in Education, 7(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, J., Reed, R., & Miller, H. (1986). School organization and the quality of schooling: A study of Victorian government secondary schools. ACER Research Monograph, 29. Hawthorn, Victoria: ACER.

  • Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. (2000). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended 2-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos ™ 7.0 [Computer software]. Amos Development Corporation. Chicago, IL: Small Waters.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Bos, W., & Watermann, R. (1998). TIMSS/III: Schülerleistungen in Mathematik und den Naturwissenschaften am Ende der Sekundarstufe II im internationalen Vergleich. Zusammenfassung deskriptiver Ergebnisse (Studien und Berichte/Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung No. 64). Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.

  • Behnken, I., Günther, C., vel Job, O. K., Keiser, S., Karig, U., Krüger, H. H., Lindner, B., von Wensierski, H.-J., & Zinnecker, J. (1991). Schülerstudie ′90. Jugendliche im Prozess der Vereinigung. Weinheim: Juventa.

  • Bourke, S. F. (1993). Quality of life of primary and secondary students: Studies of classrooms and schools. In John S. Shellard (Ed.), New South Wales institute for educational research bulletin of proceedings 1992 (pp. 71–77). Kingswood, Australia: New South Wales Institute for Educational Research.

  • Bourke, S. F., & Smith, M. (1995). Student and contextual effects on academic success: A multilevel analysis. Resource document. Australian Association for Research in Education. http://www.aare.edu.au/95pap/bours95163.txt. Accessed 11 February 2011.

  • Byrne, B. M. (1989). Multigroup comparisons and the assumption of equivalent construct validity across groups: Methodological and substantive issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 503–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using Amos graphics: A road less travelled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Durkin, K., & Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Adolescent reputations and risk: Developmental trajectories to delinquency. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caygill, R., Sturrock, F., & Chamberlain, M. (2007). Mathematics and science achievement in New Zealand: Tracking the changes of year 5 students in TIMSS 1994–2002. Wellington: Comparative Education Research Unit, Research Division, Ministry of Education.

  • Chamberlain, M. (2007). Mathematics and science achievement in New Zealand: Summing up New Zealand’s participation in three cycles of TIMSS at Year 9. Wellington: Comparative Education Research Unit, Research Division, Ministry of Education.

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, T., & Flockton, L. (2005). Mathematics: National Educational Monitoring Project: 2005 Report. Dunedin, NZ: University of Otago.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination theory research (pp. 431–441). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deslandes, R., Royer, E., Turcotte, D., & Bertrand, R. (1997). School achievement at the secondary level: Influence of parenting style and parent involvement in schooling. McGill Journal of Education, 32, 191–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinber (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 404–434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., & McPartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fend, H. (1997). Der Umgang mit der Schule in der Adoleszenz. Aufbau und Verlust von Lernmotivation, Selbstachtung und Empathie. Bern: Huber.

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2006, July). Large-scale assessment of student competencies. Resource document. JISC Homepage. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/asttle_casestudy.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2011.

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009a). Some correlates of academic performance in New Zealand schools: The asTTle data base. In C. Rubie-Davies & C. Rawlinson (Eds.), Challenging thinking about teaching and learning (pp. 75–96). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009b). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C., Brown, G. T. L., Keegan, P. J., MacKay, A. J., Irving, S. E., Cutforth, S., et al. (2004). Assessment tools for teaching and learning (asTTle) version 4, 2005: Manual. Wellington, NZ: University of Auckland, Ministry of Education & Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C., Holt, A., & Rajkumar, C. P. (2008). Generation II: e-asTTle V7. An internet computer application. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes-Smith, P., & Rowe, K. (1994, January). The development and use of congeneric measurement models in school effectiveness research: Improving the reliability and validity of composite and latent variables for fitting multilevel and structural equation models. Paper presented at the International Congress on School Effectiveness and Improvement, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isherwood, G. B., & Hammah, C. K. (1981). Home and school factors and the quality of school life in Canadian high school. In J. L. Epstein (Ed.), the quality of school life (pp. 137–152). Lexington, DC: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izzo, C. V., Weissberg, R. P., Kasprow, W. J., & Fendrich, M. (1999). A longitudinal assessment of teacher perceptions of parent involvement in children’s education and school performance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 817–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least square methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A., & Weidenmann, B. (Eds.). (2001). Pädagogische Psychologie. Ein Lehrbuch. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, H. V., Hattie, J. A. C., Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., & Reddish, P. (2005). NZ students’ performance in mathematics (asTTle Monograph No. 2). Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland & Ministry of Education.

  • Leonard, C., Bourke, S. F., & Schofield, N. (2002). Student quality of school life—A multilevel analysis. Resource document. Sid Bourke Homepage. http://www.newcastle.edu.au/research-centre/sorti/people/sid-bourke.html. Accessed 11 February 2011.

  • Linnakyla, P. (1996). Quality of school life in the Finnish comprehensive school: A comparative view. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut off values for fit indexes and dangers in over generalizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, M. (1992). Construct validity of the quality of school life scale. Psychological Test Bulletin, 5, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, M., & Flynn, M. (2002). Determinants of students’ quality of school life: A path model. Learning Environments Research, 5, 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ’Otunuku, M., & Brown, G. T. L. (2007). Tongan students’ attitudes towards their subjects in New Zealand relative to their academic achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review., 8(11), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, N. S. K. (1999). Students quality of school life in band 5 schools. Asian Journal of Counselling, 6(l), 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H., Hicks, L., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Relations of perceived social efficacy and social goal pursuit to self-efficacy for academic work. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H., & Townsend, M. A. R. (1995, April). The influence of perceived social competence on school beginners’ emergent academic intrinsic motivation. Resource document. Education Resources Information Center. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/14/45/04.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2011.

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education. Theory, research and applications. Eglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (2000). Motivation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmann, S., & McMilllan, J. (2003). Influences on achievement in literacy and numeracy. Longitudinal survey of Australian youth. Research Report 36. Australian Council for Educational Research Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.

  • Rustemeyer, R., & Jubel, A. (1996). Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede im Unterrichtsfach Mathematik hinsichtlich der Fähigkeitseinschätzung, Leistungserwartung, Attributionen sowie im Lernaufwand und im Interesse. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 10, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satherely, P. (2006). Student outcome overview 2001–2005: Research findings on student achievement in reading, writing and mathematics in New Zealand schools. Wellington, NZ: Comparative Education Research Unit, Research Division, Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, H. (1981). Choice schemes and the quality of school life in West German comprehensive schools. In J. L. Epstein (Ed.), The quality of school life (pp. 117–136). Lexington, DC: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (2002, April). First results from PISA. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA.

  • Steiger, J. H. (2000). Point estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: Some comments and a reply to Hayduk and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telford, M., & Caygill, R. (2007). PISA 2006. How ready are our 15-year-olds for tomorrow’s world? Ministry of Education New Zealand. Wellington: Comparative Education Research Unit, Research Division. Online available: http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/goto/pisa. Accessed 11 February 2011.

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4), 4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., & Looney, L. (2006). Socialization in school settings. In J. Grusec & P. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of social development (pp. 382–403). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., McNamara, C., & Caldwell, K. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children’s achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 101–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 3). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T., & Batten, M. (1981). The quality of school life (ACER Research Monograph No. 12). Hawthorn, Victoria: ACER.

  • Wilson, M. (1988). Internal construct validity and reliability of a quality of school life instrument across nationality and school level. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 995–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. E., & Jesness, C. F. (1981). Quality of school life, school problem behaviour, and juvenile delinquency. In J. L. Epstein (Ed.), The quality of school life (pp. 21–44). Lexington, DC: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Schober, B. (2001). Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen von Reattributionstrainings. Regensburg: Roderer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Department of Education, University of Paderborn, Warburger Str. 100, 33098, Paderborn, Germany

    Sandra Winheller

  2. Melbourne Institute for Research in Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    John A. Hattie

  3. Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand

    Gavin T. L. Brown

Authors
  1. Sandra Winheller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John A. Hattie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gavin T. L. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Winheller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winheller, S., Hattie, J.A. & Brown, G.T.L. Factors influencing early adolescents’ mathematics achievement: High-quality teaching rather than relationships. Learning Environ Res 16, 49–69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9106-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9106-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation