Abstract
Objective
Many of the medical risk factors for adverse birth outcomes (e.g., preeclampsia) are regularly monitored in prenatal care. However, many of the psychosocial risk factors associated with adverse birth outcomes (e.g., maternal stress, anxiety, depression, intimate partner violence) are not regularly addressed during routine prenatal care. Comprehensive prenatal screening for psychosocial risk factors for adverse birth outcomes can improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this study, we examine an existing tool for opportunities to streamline and improve screening.
Methods
We reviewed medical records for 528 mother-infant dyads, recording maternal responses to a 21-item prenatal risk screening tool, and gestational age/birth weight of infants. Multiple approaches to scoring were used to predict likelihood of adverse birth outcome.
Results
Women who answered yes to any of the top four interrelated items were 3.32 times more likely to have an adverse birth outcome. Sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 65%, respectively.
Conclusion for Practice
We identified a short surveillance tool to identify women who are at highest risk and require more in-depth screening, and to rule out women who are at very low risk of an adverse birth outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. F. S Committee, M. H. I. Committee for C. W. S. N. P. A., & others. (2006). Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 118(1), 405–420.
Bair-Merritt, M. H., Lewis-O’Connor, A., Goel, S., Amato, P., Ismailji, T., Jelley, M., Lenahan, P., & Cronholm, P. (2014). Primary care–based interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(2), 188–194.
Beck, S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., Betran, A. P., Merialdi, M., Requejo, J. H., Rubens, C., Menon, R., & Van Look, P. F. (2010). The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: A systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 31–38.
Bernazzani, O., Marks, M. N., Bifulco, A., Siddle, K., Asten, P., & Conroy, S. (2005). Assessing psychosocial risk in pregnant/postpartum women using the contextual assessment of maternity experience (CAME). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(6), 497–508.
Boyd, R. C., Mogul, M., Newman, D., & Coyne, J. C. (2011). Screening and referral for postpartum depression among low-income women: A qualitative perspective from community health workers. Depression Research and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/320605
Chisholm, C. A., Bullock, L., & Ferguson, J. E. J., II. (2017). Intimate partner violence and pregnancy: Epidemiology and impact. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217(2), 141–144.
Coker, A. L., Garcia, L. S., Williams, C. M., Crawford, T. N., Clear, E. R., McFarlane, J., & Ferguson, J. E. (2012). Universal psychosocial screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes in an academic obstetric clinic. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 119(6), 1180–1189.
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150(6), 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
Cramer, M. E., Chen, L.-W., Roberts, S., & Clute, D. (2007). Evaluating the social and economic impact of community-based prenatal care. Public Health Nursing, 24(4), 329–336.
Dworkin, P. H. (1993). Detection of behavioral, developmental, and psychosocial problems in pediatric primary care practice. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 5(5), 531–536.
Florida Department of Health. (2009). Healthy start standard and guidelines. https://www.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/childrens-health/healthy-start/index.html#heading_2
Fox, L., Carta, J., Strain, P. S., Dunlap, G., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2010). Response to intervention and the pyramid model. Infants & Young Children, 23(1), 3–13.
Goldenberg, R. L., Culhane, J. F., Iams, J. D., & Romero, R. (2008). Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. The Lancet, 371(9606), 75–84.
Hansotte, E., Payne, S. I., & Babich, S. M. (2017). Positive postpartum depression screening practices and subsequent mental health treatment for low-income women in Western countries: A systematic literature review. Public Health Reviews, 38(1), 1–17.
Hardt, N. S., Eliazar, J., Burt, M., Das, R., Winter, W. P., Saliba, H., & Roth, J. (2013). Use of a prenatal risk screen to predict maternal traumatic pregnancy-associated death: Program and policy implications. Women’s Health Issues, 23(3), e187–e193.
Heron, M. P. (2019). Deaths: Leading causes for 2017.
Montoya-Williams, D., Bright, M., Martinez, S., Echavarria, M., Mercado, R., Lorch, S., & Thompson, L. (2020). Associations between a healthy start program prenatal risk screening tool and adverse birth outcomes: A study using the mother/infant dyad screening cohort. Journal of Women’s Health, 29(5), 647–655.
O’connor, M. J., & Whaley, S. E. (2007). Brief intervention for alcohol use by pregnant women. American Journal of Public Health, 97(2), 252–258.
Parsons, L. H., Zaccaro, D., Wells, B., & Stovall, T. G. (1995). Methods of and attitudes toward screening obstetrics and gynecology patients for domestic violence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 173(2), 381–387.
Requejo, J., Merialdi, M., Althabe, F., Keller, M., Katz, J., & Menon, R. (2013). Born too soon: Care during pregnancy and childbirth to reduce preterm deliveries and improve health outcomes of the preterm baby. Reproductive Health, 10(1), 1–15.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Kroenke, K., Hornyak, R., McMurray, J., Group, P. H. Q. O.-G. S., & others. (2000). Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: The PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire obstetrics-gynecology study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 183(3), 759–769.
Staneva, A., Bogossian, F., Pritchard, M., & Wittkowski, A. (2015). The effects of maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 28(3), 179–193.
Thompson, D. R., Hopkins, R. S., & Watkins, S. M. (1993). Using the birth record to develop a screening instrument for infant mortality and morbidity. Florida Journal of Public Health, 5(1), 4–7.
Thompson, E. L., Thompson, L. A., Black, E. W., Esernio-Jenssen, D., Hardt, N., Das, R., & Roth, J. (2013). Identifying indicators during pregnancy for child maltreatment. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(10), 1817–1824.
Thompson, L. A., Filipp, S. L., Mack, J. A., Mercado, R. E., Barnes, A., Bright, M., Shenkman, E. A., & Gurka, M. J. (2020). Specific adverse childhood experiences and their association with other adverse childhood experiences, asthma and emotional, developmental and behavioral problems in childhood. Pediatric Research, 88(1), 100–109.
Thompson, L. A., Filipp, S. L., Mercado, R. E., & Gurka, M. J. (2021). Streamlining primary care screening for adverse childhood experiences. Pediatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01341-1
Vos, A. A., Van Veen, M. J., Birnie, E., Denktaş, S., Steegers, E. A., & Bonsel, G. J. (2015). An instrument for broadened risk assessment in antenatal health care including non-medical issues. International Journal of Integrated Care. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1512
Waller, A., Bryant, J., Cameron, E., Galal, M., Symonds, I., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2018). Screening for recommended antenatal risk factors: How long does it take? Women and Birth, 31(6), 489–495.
Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2003). Interventions for violence against women: Scientific review. JAMA, 289(5), 589–600.
Wu, S. S., Ma, C.-X., Carter, R. L., Ariet, M., Feaver, E. A., Resnick, M. B., & Roth, J. (2004). Risk factors for infant maltreatment: A population-based study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(12), 1253–1264.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank our team of data collectors: Dr. Mickey Emmanuel, Dr. Daniel Castro & Dr. Bedirhan Tarhan.
Funding
No funding was required to initiate or complete this study. Research reported in this publication relied on REDCap services provided by the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is supported in part by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award Number UL1TR001427. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
At the time of this study, Dr. Bright was affiliated with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Florida. At the time of publication, her affiliation is with the Center for Violence Prevention Research.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bright, M.A., Parrott, M., Martin, S. et al. Streamlining Universal Prenatal Screening for Risk for Adverse Birth Outcomes. Matern Child Health J 26, 1022–1029 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03420-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03420-7