Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Streamlining Universal Prenatal Screening for Risk for Adverse Birth Outcomes

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Many of the medical risk factors for adverse birth outcomes (e.g., preeclampsia) are regularly monitored in prenatal care. However, many of the psychosocial risk factors associated with adverse birth outcomes (e.g., maternal stress, anxiety, depression, intimate partner violence) are not regularly addressed during routine prenatal care. Comprehensive prenatal screening for psychosocial risk factors for adverse birth outcomes can improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this study, we examine an existing tool for opportunities to streamline and improve screening.

Methods

We reviewed medical records for 528 mother-infant dyads, recording maternal responses to a 21-item prenatal risk screening tool, and gestational age/birth weight of infants. Multiple approaches to scoring were used to predict likelihood of adverse birth outcome.

Results

Women who answered yes to any of the top four interrelated items were 3.32 times more likely to have an adverse birth outcome. Sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 65%, respectively.

Conclusion for Practice

We identified a short surveillance tool to identify women who are at highest risk and require more in-depth screening, and to rule out women who are at very low risk of an adverse birth outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B. F. S Committee, M. H. I. Committee for C. W. S. N. P. A., & others. (2006). Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 118(1), 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair-Merritt, M. H., Lewis-O’Connor, A., Goel, S., Amato, P., Ismailji, T., Jelley, M., Lenahan, P., & Cronholm, P. (2014). Primary care–based interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(2), 188–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., Betran, A. P., Merialdi, M., Requejo, J. H., Rubens, C., Menon, R., & Van Look, P. F. (2010). The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: A systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 31–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernazzani, O., Marks, M. N., Bifulco, A., Siddle, K., Asten, P., & Conroy, S. (2005). Assessing psychosocial risk in pregnant/postpartum women using the contextual assessment of maternity experience (CAME). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(6), 497–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. C., Mogul, M., Newman, D., & Coyne, J. C. (2011). Screening and referral for postpartum depression among low-income women: A qualitative perspective from community health workers. Depression Research and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/320605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, C. A., Bullock, L., & Ferguson, J. E. J., II. (2017). Intimate partner violence and pregnancy: Epidemiology and impact. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217(2), 141–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A. L., Garcia, L. S., Williams, C. M., Crawford, T. N., Clear, E. R., McFarlane, J., & Ferguson, J. E. (2012). Universal psychosocial screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes in an academic obstetric clinic. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 119(6), 1180–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150(6), 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, M. E., Chen, L.-W., Roberts, S., & Clute, D. (2007). Evaluating the social and economic impact of community-based prenatal care. Public Health Nursing, 24(4), 329–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, P. H. (1993). Detection of behavioral, developmental, and psychosocial problems in pediatric primary care practice. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 5(5), 531–536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Health. (2009). Healthy start standard and guidelines. https://www.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/childrens-health/healthy-start/index.html#heading_2

  • Fox, L., Carta, J., Strain, P. S., Dunlap, G., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2010). Response to intervention and the pyramid model. Infants & Young Children, 23(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, R. L., Culhane, J. F., Iams, J. D., & Romero, R. (2008). Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. The Lancet, 371(9606), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansotte, E., Payne, S. I., & Babich, S. M. (2017). Positive postpartum depression screening practices and subsequent mental health treatment for low-income women in Western countries: A systematic literature review. Public Health Reviews, 38(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, N. S., Eliazar, J., Burt, M., Das, R., Winter, W. P., Saliba, H., & Roth, J. (2013). Use of a prenatal risk screen to predict maternal traumatic pregnancy-associated death: Program and policy implications. Women’s Health Issues, 23(3), e187–e193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, M. P. (2019). Deaths: Leading causes for 2017.

  • Montoya-Williams, D., Bright, M., Martinez, S., Echavarria, M., Mercado, R., Lorch, S., & Thompson, L. (2020). Associations between a healthy start program prenatal risk screening tool and adverse birth outcomes: A study using the mother/infant dyad screening cohort. Journal of Women’s Health, 29(5), 647–655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’connor, M. J., & Whaley, S. E. (2007). Brief intervention for alcohol use by pregnant women. American Journal of Public Health, 97(2), 252–258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, L. H., Zaccaro, D., Wells, B., & Stovall, T. G. (1995). Methods of and attitudes toward screening obstetrics and gynecology patients for domestic violence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 173(2), 381–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Requejo, J., Merialdi, M., Althabe, F., Keller, M., Katz, J., & Menon, R. (2013). Born too soon: Care during pregnancy and childbirth to reduce preterm deliveries and improve health outcomes of the preterm baby. Reproductive Health, 10(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Kroenke, K., Hornyak, R., McMurray, J., Group, P. H. Q. O.-G. S., & others. (2000). Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: The PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire obstetrics-gynecology study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 183(3), 759–769.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staneva, A., Bogossian, F., Pritchard, M., & Wittkowski, A. (2015). The effects of maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 28(3), 179–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. R., Hopkins, R. S., & Watkins, S. M. (1993). Using the birth record to develop a screening instrument for infant mortality and morbidity. Florida Journal of Public Health, 5(1), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. L., Thompson, L. A., Black, E. W., Esernio-Jenssen, D., Hardt, N., Das, R., & Roth, J. (2013). Identifying indicators during pregnancy for child maltreatment. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(10), 1817–1824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. A., Filipp, S. L., Mack, J. A., Mercado, R. E., Barnes, A., Bright, M., Shenkman, E. A., & Gurka, M. J. (2020). Specific adverse childhood experiences and their association with other adverse childhood experiences, asthma and emotional, developmental and behavioral problems in childhood. Pediatric Research, 88(1), 100–109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. A., Filipp, S. L., Mercado, R. E., & Gurka, M. J. (2021). Streamlining primary care screening for adverse childhood experiences. Pediatric Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01341-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, A. A., Van Veen, M. J., Birnie, E., Denktaş, S., Steegers, E. A., & Bonsel, G. J. (2015). An instrument for broadened risk assessment in antenatal health care including non-medical issues. International Journal of Integrated Care. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1512

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, A., Bryant, J., Cameron, E., Galal, M., Symonds, I., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2018). Screening for recommended antenatal risk factors: How long does it take? Women and Birth, 31(6), 489–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2003). Interventions for violence against women: Scientific review. JAMA, 289(5), 589–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. S., Ma, C.-X., Carter, R. L., Ariet, M., Feaver, E. A., Resnick, M. B., & Roth, J. (2004). Risk factors for infant maltreatment: A population-based study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(12), 1253–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our team of data collectors: Dr. Mickey Emmanuel, Dr. Daniel Castro & Dr. Bedirhan Tarhan.

Funding

No funding was required to initiate or complete this study. Research reported in this publication relied on REDCap services provided by the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is supported in part by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award Number UL1TR001427. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa A. Bright.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

At the time of this study, Dr. Bright was affiliated with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Florida. At the time of publication, her affiliation is with the Center for Violence Prevention Research.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 69 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bright, M.A., Parrott, M., Martin, S. et al. Streamlining Universal Prenatal Screening for Risk for Adverse Birth Outcomes. Matern Child Health J 26, 1022–1029 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03420-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03420-7

Keywords

Navigation