Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Giving hope a sporting chance: Hope as distinct from optimism when events are possible but not probable

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Popular hope theories treat hope as an expectancy-based construct, with individuals more hopeful the greater their perceived likelihood of success. Consequently, the distinction between hope and other expectancy-based concepts (e.g., optimism) is unclear. The present research aims to identify the unique nature of hope, suggesting hope is invoked in particular when expectations of positive outcomes are low. As long as there is a possibility of those outcomes eventuating, individuals highly invested in them are more likely to hope; but with greater probability hope tends to align with optimism. In Study 1, for supporters of bottom-tier football teams strongly invested in the hoped-for outcome of their team winning, hope’s relationship with likelihood was cubic, accelerating with mere possibility; contrastingly, for optimism the relationship was linear. Study 2 replicated these findings for voters’ hope in state election outcomes. Hope is distinct from optimism and positive expectation; hope is tapped into when odds are low yet individuals are highly invested in the outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In line with other writers’ warning against making data fit a pre-defined definition of hope (Tong et al. 2010), we will investigate how hope fits individuals’ actual usage of the term. However, the term hope is not precise; for example it is often used to express a wish or desire (e.g., I would hope so), or used in the ideological sense of “it is my hope”, rather than a goal focused, possible and meaningful hope. While hope can represent an objective assessment of hope (e.g., there is hope), this research focuses on the usages of hope whereby individuals are actively hoping. Actively hoping does not imply a sense of personal agency, in fact this research aims to show hope’s role when agency is limited, rather it suggests that individuals are the actor, they do the hoping and commit to a positive outlook. This is most typically represented in phrases such as “I am hopeful that…” or “I have hope that…”, which were therefore used in the present research. Also, while the hoped-for outcome can include the “amelioration of a dreaded outcome” (Lazarus, 1991, p.282, e.g., I am hopeful X does not occur), this paper focuses on positive goals (promotion goals; Higgins, 1997).

  2. We focus on a goal specific optimism, or what Peterson (2000) terms little optimism. Little optimism reflects a specific positive expectation of a future outcome, whereas big optimism refers to more general expectations, in line with dispositional measures of optimism (Carver et al. 2010; Scheier and Carver 1985). Though argued as being separate but related constructs (Peterson, 2000), which has some support in the literature (Gyurcsik and Brawley 2001; Kluemper et al. 2009), little optimisms focus on specific outcomes and development through idiosyncratic experiences (Peterson, 2000), making it more appropriate for the specific outcomes in the current research.

  3. As all games were at the home ground of the bottom tier side, the difference in personal investment could be due to more dedicated fans traveling to the opponent’s home ground.

  4. Anecdotally, top-tier supporters often seemed bemused by the hope/optimism questions, arguing that hope and optimism were the same thing.

References

Download references

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon M. Bury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bury, S.M., Wenzel, M. & Woodyatt, L. Giving hope a sporting chance: Hope as distinct from optimism when events are possible but not probable. Motiv Emot 40, 588–601 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9560-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9560-z

Keywords

Navigation