Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Global Optimal Path Planning and Controller Design Algorithm for Intelligent Vehicles

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autonomous vehicle guidance and trajectory planning is one of the key technologies in the autonomous control system for intelligent vehicles. Firstly, the target pursuit model for intelligent vehicles was established and described in this text. Then, the research work for global motion planning was carried out based on Stackelberg Differential Game Theory, and the global optimal solution was obtained by using the survival type differential game. Finally, to overcome errors, we use a polynomial method to achieve the smooth motion planning. So, based on Terminal Sliding Mode method, the Active Front Steering controller design was used to calculate the desired active wheel angle for intelligent vehicle path tracking. The simulation and experiment results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of this method for intelligent vehicles’ path planning and tracking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yilmaz NK et al (2008) Path planning of autonomous underwater vehicles for adaptive sampling using mixed integer linear programming. IEEE J Ocean Eng 33(4):522–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia MA et al (2009) Path planning for autonomous mobile robot navigation with ant colony optimization and fuzzy cost function evaluation. Appl Soft Comput 9(3):1102–1110

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu C, Duan H, Liu F (2010) Chaotic artificial bee colony approach to uninhabited combat air vehicle (UCAV) path planning. Aerosp Sci Technol 14(8):535–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaillet L, Cortés J, Siméon T (2010) Sampling-based path planning on configuration-space costmaps. IEEE Trans Robot 26(4):635–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirillova S et al (2008) An NMA-guided path planning approach for computing large-amplitude conformational changes in proteins. Prot: Struct Funct Bioinform 70(1):131–143

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sud A et al (2008) Real-time path planning in dynamic virtual environments using multiagent navigation graphs. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 14(3):526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai C, Huang H, Chan C (2011) Parallel elite genetic algorithm and its application to global path planning for autonomous robot navigation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(10):4813–4821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roberge V, Tarbouchi M, Labonté G (2013) Comparison of parallel genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for real-time UAV path planning. IEEE Transact Indust Inform 9(1):132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahmoudian N, Geisbert J, Woolsey C (2010) Approximate analytical turning conditions for underwater gliders: implications for motion control and path planning. IEEE J Ocean Eng 35(1):131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu S, Sun D, Zhu C (2011) Coordinated motion planning for multiple mobile robots along designed paths with formation requirement. IEEE/ASME Transact Mechatron 16(6):1021–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soulignac M (2011) Feasible and optimal path planning in strong current fields. IEEE Trans Robot 27(1):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gasparetto A et al (2012) Experimental validation and comparative analysis of optimal time-jerk algorithms for trajectory planning. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28(2):164–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun N et al (2012) A novel kinematic coupling-based trajectory planning method for overhead cranes. IEEE/ASME Transact Mechatron 17(1):166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang R, Ge P, Zhou X, Jiang T, Wang R (2013) An Method for Vehicle-Flow Detection and Tracking in Real-Time Based on Gaussian Mixture Distribution. Adv Mech Eng 2013(861321):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Glaser S et al (2010) Maneuver-based trajectory planning for highly autonomous vehicles on real road with traffic and driver interaction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 11(3):589–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson SJ et al (2010) An optimal-control-based framework for trajectory planning, threat assessment, and semi-autonomous control of passenger vehicles in hazard avoidance scenarios. Int J Veh Auton Syst 8(2):190–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Capisani LM, Ferrara A (2012) Trajectory planning and second-order sliding mode motion/interaction control for robot manipulators in unknown environments. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 59(8):3189–3198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duan H, Liu S, Wu J (2009) Novel intelligent water drops optimization approach to single UCAV smooth trajectory planning. Aerosp Sci Technol 13(8):442–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gasparetto A, Zanotto V (2008) A technique for time-jerk optimal planning of robot trajectories. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 24(3):415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karaman S, Frazzoli E (2011) Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. Intern J Robot Res 30(7):846–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kress-Gazit H, Fainekos GE, Pappas GJ (2009) Temporal-logic-based reactive mission and motion planning. IEEE Trans Robot 25(6):1370–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wen-xiao Z, Tong-hai J, Xiao L, Jun-lin Z, Rong-hui Z, Yan-en W (2014) Transmission of wireless sensor networks based on distributed multi-staging area check method. J Jilin Univ Eng Technol Ed 44(01):246–252

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuwata Y et al (2009) Real-time motion planning with applications to autonomous urban driving. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 17(5):1105–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Likhachev M, Ferguson D (2009) Planning long dynamically feasible maneuvers for autonomous vehicles. Intern J Robot Res 28(8):933–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghabcheloo R et al (2009) Coordinated path-following in the presence of communication losses and time delays. SIAM J Control Optim 48(1):234–265

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Dolgov D et al (2010) Path planning for autonomous vehicles in unknown semi-structured environments. Intern J Robot Res 29(5):485–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nouyan S, Campo A, Dorigo M (2008) Path formation in a robot swarm. Swarm Intell 2(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng Y, Ronghui Z, Lie G et al (2015) Trajectory planning and tracking control for autonomous lane change maneuver based on the cooperative vehicle infrastructure system. Expert Syst Appl 45(2015):5932–5946

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation under Grant No.LY13E080010. The first author would like to appreciate Dr. Xuecai Yu and the reviewers for the valuable discussions to improve the quality and presentation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue-cai Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Hw., Yu, Xc., Song, Hb. et al. A Global Optimal Path Planning and Controller Design Algorithm for Intelligent Vehicles. Mobile Netw Appl 23, 1165–1178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0778-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-016-0778-5

Keywords

Navigation