Neuron activity in two symmetrical areas of the prefrontal cortex in the left and right hemispheres of the rat brain (55 and 47 neurons, respectively) was recorded as the animals performed a behavioral choice task in a two-ring maze. Experiments were performed in two sets of conditions – i) working with a conditioned signal, when excursions to the side indicated by the signal were reinforced, and ii) without a signal, when any excursion was reinforced. The levels of involvement of a neuron in different steps of the behavioral program were evaluated in terms of the level of differential activity, i.e., differences in neuron activity in right- and left-sided performances. In conditions in which the animal took the decision without orienting itself to external signals (in two behavioral situations: working without signals and erroneous performance of the program), there was a predominance of differential activity in the left hemisphere. In correct performances of the program, activity dominated in the right hemisphere. This appears to be evidence of a consistent dynamic in the interaction between the hemispheres depending on external and internal conditions and the special role of the right hemisphere in learning mechanisms and inclusion of the external determinant in the adaptive response system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. N. Zaichenko, N. G. Mikhailova, and Yu. V. Raigorodskii, “Neuron activity in the prefrontal cortex in rats with different topological characteristics in emotional treatments,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 50, No. 3, 492–499 (2000).
V. P. Leutin and E. I. Nikolaeva, Functional Asymmetry of the Brain: Myths and Reality, Rech, St. Petersburg (2008).
A. A. Orlov and E. V. Filatova, “A miniature system for independent micromanipulators for recording neuron activity in freely moving animals,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 96, No. 6, 640–643 (2010).
E. V. Filatova, A. A. Orlov, and S. V. Afanas’ev, “A two-ring maze for studying the behavior of laboratory animals,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 100, No. 1, 27–35 (2014).
E. V. Filatova, A. A. Orlov, S. V. Afanas’ev, and B. F. Tolkunov, “Blocks of neuronal correlates of behavior in the prefrontal cortex and striatum in the brains of monkeys,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 92, No. 6, 692–699 (2006).
V. F. Fokin, I. N. Bogolepova, B. Gutnik, et al., Handbook of Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry, Nauchnyi Mir (2009).
A. S. Batuev, A. A. Pirogov, and A. A. Orlov, “Unit activity of the prefrontal cortex during delayed alternation performance in monkey,” Acta Physiol. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae, 53, No. 3, 345 (1979).
C. W. Berridge, R. A. España, and T. A. Stalnaker, “Stress and coping: Lateralization of dopamine systems projecting to the prefrontal cortex,” in: Brain Asymmetry, K. Hugdahl and R. J. Davidson (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2002), 2nd ed., pp. 69–104.
C. W. Berridge, E. Mitton, W. Clark, and R. H. Roth, “Engagement in a non-escape (displacement) behavior elicits a selective and lateralized suppression of frontal cortical dopaminergic utilization in stress,” Synapse, 32, 187–197 (1999).
G. B. Bissonette and M. R. Roesch, “Neural correlates of rules and conflict in medial prefrontal cortex during decision and feedback epochs,” Front. Behav. Neurosci., 9, 266 (2015), eCollection, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00266.
C. H. I. Chang, J. D. Berke, and S. Maren, “Single-unit activity in the medial prefrontal cortex during immediate and delayed extinction of fear in rats,” PLoS One, 5, No. 8, e11971 (2010), doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0011971.
P. L. Croxson, M. E. Wallon, E. D. Boorman, et al., “Unilateral medial frontal cortex lesions cause a cognitive decision-making deficit in rats,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 40, 3757–3765 (2014).
N. C. Di Pietro, Y. D. Black, and K. M. Kantak, “Context-dependent prefrontal cortex regulation of cocaine self-administration and reinstatement behaviors in rats,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 24, 3285–3298 (2006).
S. Funahashi, M. Inoue, and K. Kubota, “Delay-period activity in the primate prefrontal cortex encoding multiple spatial positions and their order of presentation,” Behav. Brain Res., 84, No. 1–2, 203–223 (1997).
E. Goldberg and L. D. Costa, “Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems,” Brain Lang., 14, No. 1, 144–173 (1981).
J. M. Hyman, L. Ma, E. Balaguer-Ballester, et al., “Contextual encoding by ensembles of medial prefrontal cortex neurons,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, No. 13, 5086–5091 (2012).
G. Ji and V. Neugebauer, “Modulation of medial prefrontal cortical activity using in vivo recordings and optogenetics,” Mol. Brain, 5, 36 (2012), doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-5-36.
G. Ji, H. Sun, Y. Fu, et al., “Cognitive impairment in pain through amygdala-driven prefrontal cortical deactivation,” J. Neurosci., 30, No. 15, 5451–5464 (2010).
G. Paxinos and C. Watson, The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, Academic Press (2006), 6th ed.
Z. Petykó, R. Gálosi, A. Tóth, et al., “Responses of rat medial prefrontal cortical neurons to Pavlovian conditioned stimuli and to delivery of appetitive reward,” Behav. Brain Res., 287, 109–119 (2015).
R. M. Sullivan, “Hemispheric asymmetry in stress processing in rat prefrontal cortex and the role of mesocortical dopamine,” Stress, 7, 131–143 (2004).
M. R. Warden, A. Selimbeyoglu, J. J. Mirzabekov, et al., “A prefrontal cortex-brainstem neuronal projection that controls response to behavioural challenge,” Nature, 492, No. 7429, 428–432 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 102, No. 7, pp. 807–814, July, 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filatova, E.V., Orlov, A.A. & Afanas’ev, S.V. The Relationship between Prefrontal Cortex Neuron Activity in the Two Hemispheres on Performance of a Choice Task in a Two-Ring Maze. Neurosci Behav Physi 48, 11–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0524-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0524-x