Skip to main content
Log in

Aftereffects of Approaching and Receding Sound Sources on Postural Responses in Humans

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The intersensory effects of auditory adaptation to motion have thus far been studied only in relation to visual perception, though auditory adaptation can also influence other sensory systems. We report here the first attempts to demonstrate the reaction of the postural regulatory system during and after 45-sec adaptation to an approaching and receding sound source, which was modeled in conditions of a free field using sequences of rhythmic tonal bursts of changing amplitude and frequency. A stabilometric method identified oscillations of the center of pressure in the sagittal plane during the stimulation rhythm, more marked for approach than recession. These oscillations led to increases in the length of the trajectory of the center of pressure and the mean linear speed of motion. While listening to approaching sound sources, the center of pressure was displaced in the direction of motion; during the 20 sec following the end of the stimulus, displacement in the opposite direction was seen – a typical “negative” aftereffect. These data are consistent with results from studies of postural reactions to moving visual stimuli, where “negative” effects are also observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ya. A. Altman, Spatial Hearing, St. Petersburg (2011).

  2. I. G. Andreeva, “Aftereffects of motion as a universal phenomenon for sensory systems involved in orientation in space. II. Auditory aftereffects,” Zh. Evolyuts. Biokhim. Fiziol., 51, No. 3, 145–153 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. I. G. Andreeva, “Aftereffects of motion as a universal phenomenon for sensory systems involved in orientation in space. Visual aftereffects,” Zh. Evolyuts. Biokhim. Fiziol., 50, No. 6, 413–419 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. I. G. Andreeva, “Duration of auditory aftereffects on short-term adaptation to an approaching sound source,” Sensor. Sistemy, 24, No. 4, 28–34 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Yu. Boboshko, E. S. Garbaruk, E. V. Zhilinskaya, and A. Kh. Abu-Dzhamea, “Use of a pause detection test to assess the time resolution of the ability of the human auditory system,” Ros. Otorinolaringol., No. 6, 16–20 (2012).

  6. I. A. Vartanyan, I. G. Andreeva, A. Yu. Mazing, and A. M. Markovich, “Optimum parameters of a model amplitude-impulse-modulated acoustic signal simulating frontal approach and recession of a sound source,” Aviakosmich. Ekol. Med., 33, No. 5, 36–40 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. P. Gvozdeva and I. G. Andreeva, “Assessment of the duration of the auditory aftereffects on prolonged adaptation to approach of a sound source,” Sensor. Sistemy, 27, No. 3, 205–215 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. S. Gurfinkel’ and Yu. S. Levik, “The concept of the body scheme and motor control,” in: Intellectual Processes and their Simulation. The Organization of Movement, A. V. Chernavskii (ed.), Nauka, Moscow (1991), pp. 59–105.

  9. V. S. Gurfinkel’ and Yu. S. Levik, “Muscle reception and generalization of the description of body position,” Fiziol. Chel., 25, No. 1, 87–97 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Yu. Agaeva, Ya. A. Al’tman, and I. Yu. Kirillova, “Effects of a sound source moving in a vertical plane on postural responses in humans,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 36, No. 7, 773–780 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ya. A. Al’tman, V. S. Gurfinkel’, O. V. Varyagina, and Yu. S. Levik, “The effects of moving sound images on postural responses and the head rotation illusion in humans,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 35, No. 1, 103–106 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. C. F. Altmann, S. Getzmann, and J. Lewald, “Allocentric or craniocentric representation of acoustic space: an electrotomography study using mismatch negativity,” PLoS One, 7, No. 7, e41872 (2012), doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041872.

  13. R. W. Deas, N. W. Roach, and P. V. McGraw,” Distortions of perceived auditory and visual space following adaptation to motion,” Exp. Brain Res., 191, 473–485 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. C. J. Dong, N. V. Swindale, P. Zakarauskas, et al., “The auditory motion aftereffect: its tuning and specificity in the spatial and frequency domains,” Percept. Psychophys., 62, 1099–1111 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Hidaka, Y. Manaka, W. Teramoto, et al., “Alternation of sound location induces virtual motion perception of a static object,” PLoS One, 4, No. 2, e8188 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Holten, M. J. Smagt, S. F. Donker, and F. A. J. Verstraten, “Illusory motion of the motion aftereffect induces postural sway,” Psychol. Sci., 25, No. 9, 1831–1834 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J. R. Lackner, “Induction of illusory self-rotation and nystagmus by a rotating sound-field,” Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 48, No. 2, 129–131 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Larsson, D. Västfjäll, and Kleiner M, “Perception of self-motion and presence in auditory virtual environments,” in: Proc. 7th Ann. Workshop, Presence, Valencia (2004), pp. 252–258.

  19. D. Logan, Y. P. Ivanenko, T. Kiemel, et al., “Function dictates the phase dependence of vision during human locomotion,” J. Neurophysiol., 112, No. 1, 165–180 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A. M. Marme-Karelse and W. Bles, “Circular vection and human posture. II. Does the auditory system play a role?” Agressologie, 18, No. 6, 329–333 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. M. F. Neelon and R. L. Jenison, “The effect of trajectory on the auditory motion aftereffect,” Hear. Res., 180, 57–66 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Schinauer, A. Hellmann, and R. Höger, “Dynamic acoustical stimulation affects self-motion perception. Contributions to Psychological Acoustics,” in: Results of the 6th Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics, A. Schick (ed.) (1993).

  23. R. W. Soames and S. A. Raper, “The infl uence of moving auditory fields on postural sway behaviour in man,” Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 65, 241–245 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. W. R. Thurlow and P. S. Runge, “Effect of induced head movements on localization of direction of sounds,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 42, 480–488 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Väljamäe, “Auditorily-induced illusory self-motion: A review,” Brain Res. Rev., 61, 240–255 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. F. L. Wightman and D. J. Kistler, “The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91, No. 3, 1648–1661 (1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. G. Andreeva.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 102, No. 8, pp. 976–989, August, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andreeva, I.G., Bobrova, E.V., Antifeev, I.E. et al. Aftereffects of Approaching and Receding Sound Sources on Postural Responses in Humans. Neurosci Behav Physi 48, 45–53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0528-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0528-6

Keywords

Navigation