Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disaster waste clean-up system performance subject to time-dependent disaster waste accumulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disasters can produce a substantial amount of waste that can threaten the capacity of waste management systems. This paper presents a methodology for estimating waste accumulation caused by disasters considering the uncertainty of the timing and scale of disasters that can be used to estimate the return period and the reliability of the disaster waste management system. To estimate the reliability of the system, the first-order second-moment reliability assessment method, in which the reliability index (\(\beta\)) is used to judge the reliability of a system, is applied in this paper. In addition, two case studies illustrate how the methods can be applied to the real world. The reliability index curve of the system developed from sensitivity analysis can provide information for decision-makers in terms of disaster waste clean-up arrangements. The approach developed can be used to analyze the effects of different parameters involved in the waste clean-up system after disasters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/stormarchive/.

References

  • Abbasi M, El Hanandeh A (2016) Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches. Waste Manag 56:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen JT, Allen ER (2016) Invited review article: a review of severe thunderstorms in Australia. Atmos Res 178–179:347–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirebrahimi S, Rajabifard A, Mendis P, Ngo T (2016) A framework for a microscale flood damage assessment and visualization for a building using BIM–GIS integration. Int J Digit Earth 9(4):363–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araghi A, Adamowski J, Jaghargh MR (2016) Detection of trends in days with thunderstorms in Iran over the past five decades. Atmos Res 172–173:174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basnayake B, Chiemchaisri C, Visvanathan C (2006) Wastelands: clearing up after the tsunami in Sri Lanka and Thailand. Waste Manag World, pp 31–38 (March–April)

  • Baycan F (2004) Emergency planning for disaster waste: a proposal based on the experience of the Marmara Earthquake in Turkey. In: 2004 International conference and student competition on post-disaster reconstruction “planning for reconstruction”, Coventry, UK

  • Brown C, Milke M, Seville E (2011) Disaster waste management: a review article. Waste Manag 31:1085–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Fang S-S, Lin C-L, Hung H-C (2013) Generation of solid wastes in typhoon disasters and their emergent cleaning and treatment means. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan K, Süleyman S (2003) Report: cost and financing of municipal solid waste collection services in Istanbul. Waste Manag Res 21:480–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2007) US FEMA (2007) Public assistance: debris management guide. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C

  • Hirayama N, Kawata Y, Suzuki S, Harada K (2009) Estimation procedure for potential quantity of tsunami debris on tsunami earthquake disasters. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Waste Management Landfill CD-ROM

  • Jingwei S et al (2014) Simulated annealing based hybrid forecast for improving daily municipal solid waste generation prediction. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/834357

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai J, Zhang L, Duffield C, Aye L (2013) Engineering reliability analysis in risk management framework: development and application in infrastructure project. Int J Appl Math 43(4):242–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizada JC, Ibabao RA (2013) Building resilience through solid waste management: the case of the Iloilo Province, Central Philippines, pp 698–709

  • Paulikas MJ (2014) Examining population bias relative to severe thunderstorm hazard reporting trends in the Atlanta, GA metropolitan region. Meteorol Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1394

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawtec (2009) Disaster waste management scoping study. South Australia

  • Swan RC (2000) Debris management planning for the 21st century. Nat Hazards Rev 1:222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan ST, Lee CT, Hashim H, Ho WS, Lim JS (2014) Optimal process network for municipal solid waste management in Iskandar Malaysia. J Clean Prod 71:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USACE (2006) Depth-damage relationships for structures, contents, and vehicles and content-to-structure value ratios (CSVR) in support of the Donaldsonville to the Gulf Louisiana, feasibility study. Final Draft prepared by Gulf Engineers and Consultants

  • Xiao J, Xie H, Zhang C (2012) Investigation on building waste and reclaim in Wenchuan earthquake disaster area. Resour Conserv Recycl 61:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka M, Toyota N, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A (2013) Estimation method of amount of tsunami disaster wastes during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Int J GEOMATE 4(1):456–461

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Centre for Disaster Management and Public Safety (CDMPS) and the Department of Infrastructure Engineering at the University of Melbourne.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Cheng.

Appendix

Appendix

In this Appendix, we provide the data we used to make the distributions in Fig. 3 (use data from Table 1) and Fig. 4 (use data from Tables 2 and 3) in the case study. Table 1 illustrates the number of storms in each year from 1967 to 2016 in Victoria and Queensland, respectively. In Tables 2 and 3, we show the data of the frequency analysis respecting the precipitation of storms since it is difficult to put a large quantity of original data in the tables.

Table 1 Number of storms in Victoria and Queensland in each year
Table 2 Frequency analysis of storms in Victoria
Table 3 Frequency analysis of storms in Queensland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, C., Zhang, L. & Thompson, R.G. Disaster waste clean-up system performance subject to time-dependent disaster waste accumulation. Nat Hazards 91, 717–734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3151-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3151-5

Keywords

Navigation