Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political participation researchers have developed several evaluative techniques to assess the representativeness of political participation patterns. Yet, while the Internet has become a mainstream avenue for political participation in the United States, current assessments of online participation insufficiently apply these methods. To incorporate these methods we begin by drawing upon resource theory to inform two-stage ordered-logit models of online and offline political participation. Our results suggest that the factors predicting online participation often differ from the factors that predict offline participation. Even so, we find that those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds tend to disproportionately possess these distinct online determinants. Next, we use a wide spectrum of political opinion questions to determine whether online participators’ opinions reflect or distort those of the general population. Overall, we find that online participation tends to relate moderately with liberal preferences. However, because offline participation relates to political attitudes similarly, the Internet only marginally advantages the political voice of liberals. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Michael R. Alvarez Thad Hall (2004) Point, Click, and Vote Brookings Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Larry Bartels (1991.) ArticleTitleInstrumental and quasi-instrumental variables American Journal of Political Science 35 777–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen Earl Bennett David Resnick (1990) ArticleTitleThe implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United States American Journal of Political Science 34 771–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce Bimber (1999.) ArticleTitleThe Internet and citizen communication with government: does the medium matter? Political Communication 16 409–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce Bimber (2000.) ArticleTitleThe study of information technology and civic engagement Political Communication 17 329–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce Bimber (2003) Information and American Democracy Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry Brady Sidney Verba Kay Lehman Schlozman (1995) ArticleTitleBeyond ses: a resource model of political participation American Political Science Review 89 271–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Erik Bucy (2000.) ArticleTitleSocial access to the Internet Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 5 50–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Erik Bucy Kimberly Gregson (2001) ArticleTitleMedia participation: a legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy New Media and Society 3 357–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Survey Research & Analysis (2003). Data obtained from the survey center at the University of Connecticut

  • Samprit Chatterjee Ali Hadi Bertram Price (1999) Regression Analysis by Example Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Margaret Conway (1991) Political Participation in the United States CQ Press Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Cornfield (2004.) ArticleTitleNew and improved Campaign & Elections 25 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield, Michael, Lee Rainie, and John Horrigan (2003). Untuned keyboards: online campaigners, citizens, and portals in the 2002 elections. A Pew Internet and American Life Project

  • Robert Dahl (1989) Democracy and its Critics Yale University Press New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Davis Diana Owen (1998) New Media and American Politics Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Delli Carpini (2000.) ArticleTitleGen.com: youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment Political Communication 17 341–349

    Google Scholar 

  • John Fox (1991) Regression Diagnostics Sage Publication Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Gant William Lyons (1993) ArticleTitleDemocratic theory, nonvoting, and public policy American Politics Quarterly 21 185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Tony Grubesic Alan Murray (2002) ArticleTitleConstructing the divide: spatial disparities in broadband access Papers in Regional Science 81 197–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaile Kim Hill Leighley Jan E. (1992) ArticleTitleThe policy consequences of class bias in state electorates American Journal of Political Science 36 351–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Johnson Barbara Kaye (2003) ArticleTitleA boost or bust for democracy? Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 8 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Keeter Carolyn Miller Andrew Kohut Robert M. Groves Stanley Presser (2000) ArticleTitleConsequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone survey Public Opinion Quarterly 64 125–148 Occurrence Handle10984330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, Sara, Zdaniuk, Bozena, Lundmark, Vicki, and Kraut, Robert (2000). Trobules with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction 15: 323–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Kling (1999.) ArticleTitleWhat is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine 5 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian Krueger (2002.) ArticleTitleAssessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: a resource approach American Politics Research 30 476–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Lau Gerald Pomper (2002) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections American Journal of Political Science 46 47–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, Andrew, and Atkinson, Robert (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. Paper published by The Progressive Policy Institute

  • Steven Levy (2004.) ArticleTitleDean’s net effect is just the start Newsweek 143 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend Lijphart (1997.) ArticleTitleUnequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma American Political Science Review 91 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham Murdock Peter Golding (1989) ArticleTitleInformation poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communications Journal of Communication 39 180–193

    Google Scholar 

  • National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2000). Falling through the net: toward digital inclusion. Report published by the U.S. Department of Commerce

  • Norris, Pippa (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: business as usual? In Kamarck, Elaine and Joseph Nye, Jr. (eds.), Governance.com. Washington, D.C.: Brookings

  • Norris, Pippa (1999). Who surfs? new technology, old voters and virtual democracy in the 1996 and 1998 US elections. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference

  • Robert Putnam (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Simon & Schuster New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin Radcliff (1994.) ArticleTitleTurnout and the Democratic vote American Politics Quarterly 22 259–76

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Sargan (1958.) ArticleTitleThe estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables Econometrica 26 393–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhavan Shah Jack Mcleod So-Hyang Yoon (2001) ArticleTitleCommunication, context, and community Communication Research 28 464–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Solop, Frederic (2000). Digital democracy comes of age in Arizona. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference

  • Barbara Tabachnick Linda Fidell (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics EditionNumber3 HarperCollins New York

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Tichenor G.A. Donohue C.N. Olien (1965) ArticleTitleMass media flow and differential growth in knowledge Public Opinion Quarterly 34 159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Caroline Tolbert Ramona McNeal (2003) ArticleTitleUnraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly 56 175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary (2003). CLARIFY: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results

  • Lynn Vavreck Constantine Spiliotes Linda Fowler (2002) ArticleTitleThe effects of retail politics in the New Hampshire primary American Journal of Political Science 46 595–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidney Verba Kay Lehman Schlozman Henry E. Brady (1995) Voice and Equality Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lori Weber Alysha Loumakis James Bergman (2003) ArticleTitleWho participates and why?: an analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public Social Science Computer Review 21 26–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary Wolf (2004) ArticleTitleWeapons of mass mobilization Wired 12.09 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond Wolfinger Steven Rosenstone (1980) Who Votes? Yale University Press New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian S. Krueger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Best, S.J., Krueger, B.S. Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Polit Behav 27, 183–216 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y

Keywords

Navigation