Abstract
Political participation researchers have developed several evaluative techniques to assess the representativeness of political participation patterns. Yet, while the Internet has become a mainstream avenue for political participation in the United States, current assessments of online participation insufficiently apply these methods. To incorporate these methods we begin by drawing upon resource theory to inform two-stage ordered-logit models of online and offline political participation. Our results suggest that the factors predicting online participation often differ from the factors that predict offline participation. Even so, we find that those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds tend to disproportionately possess these distinct online determinants. Next, we use a wide spectrum of political opinion questions to determine whether online participators’ opinions reflect or distort those of the general population. Overall, we find that online participation tends to relate moderately with liberal preferences. However, because offline participation relates to political attitudes similarly, the Internet only marginally advantages the political voice of liberals. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Michael R. Alvarez Thad Hall (2004) Point, Click, and Vote Brookings Washington, DC
Larry Bartels (1991.) ArticleTitleInstrumental and quasi-instrumental variables American Journal of Political Science 35 777–800
Stephen Earl Bennett David Resnick (1990) ArticleTitleThe implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United States American Journal of Political Science 34 771–802
Bruce Bimber (1999.) ArticleTitleThe Internet and citizen communication with government: does the medium matter? Political Communication 16 409–428
Bruce Bimber (2000.) ArticleTitleThe study of information technology and civic engagement Political Communication 17 329–333
Bruce Bimber (2003) Information and American Democracy Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Henry Brady Sidney Verba Kay Lehman Schlozman (1995) ArticleTitleBeyond ses: a resource model of political participation American Political Science Review 89 271–294
Erik Bucy (2000.) ArticleTitleSocial access to the Internet Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 5 50–61
Erik Bucy Kimberly Gregson (2001) ArticleTitleMedia participation: a legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy New Media and Society 3 357–380
Center for Survey Research & Analysis (2003). Data obtained from the survey center at the University of Connecticut
Samprit Chatterjee Ali Hadi Bertram Price (1999) Regression Analysis by Example Wiley New York
M. Margaret Conway (1991) Political Participation in the United States CQ Press Washington
Michael Cornfield (2004.) ArticleTitleNew and improved Campaign & Elections 25 42
Cornfield, Michael, Lee Rainie, and John Horrigan (2003). Untuned keyboards: online campaigners, citizens, and portals in the 2002 elections. A Pew Internet and American Life Project
Robert Dahl (1989) Democracy and its Critics Yale University Press New Haven
Richard Davis Diana Owen (1998) New Media and American Politics Oxford University Press New York
Michael Delli Carpini (2000.) ArticleTitleGen.com: youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment Political Communication 17 341–349
John Fox (1991) Regression Diagnostics Sage Publication Newbury Park
Michael Gant William Lyons (1993) ArticleTitleDemocratic theory, nonvoting, and public policy American Politics Quarterly 21 185–204
Tony Grubesic Alan Murray (2002) ArticleTitleConstructing the divide: spatial disparities in broadband access Papers in Regional Science 81 197–221
Quaile Kim Hill Leighley Jan E. (1992) ArticleTitleThe policy consequences of class bias in state electorates American Journal of Political Science 36 351–65
Thomas Johnson Barbara Kaye (2003) ArticleTitleA boost or bust for democracy? Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 8 9–34
Scott Keeter Carolyn Miller Andrew Kohut Robert M. Groves Stanley Presser (2000) ArticleTitleConsequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone survey Public Opinion Quarterly 64 125–148 Occurrence Handle10984330
Kiesler, Sara, Zdaniuk, Bozena, Lundmark, Vicki, and Kraut, Robert (2000). Trobules with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction 15: 323–351
Robert Kling (1999.) ArticleTitleWhat is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine 5 1–30
Brian Krueger (2002.) ArticleTitleAssessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: a resource approach American Politics Research 30 476–498
Richard Lau Gerald Pomper (2002) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections American Journal of Political Science 46 47–67
Leigh, Andrew, and Atkinson, Robert (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. Paper published by The Progressive Policy Institute
Steven Levy (2004.) ArticleTitleDean’s net effect is just the start Newsweek 143 73
Arend Lijphart (1997.) ArticleTitleUnequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma American Political Science Review 91 1–14
Graham Murdock Peter Golding (1989) ArticleTitleInformation poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communications Journal of Communication 39 180–193
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2000). Falling through the net: toward digital inclusion. Report published by the U.S. Department of Commerce
Norris, Pippa (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: business as usual? In Kamarck, Elaine and Joseph Nye, Jr. (eds.), Governance.com. Washington, D.C.: Brookings
Norris, Pippa (1999). Who surfs? new technology, old voters and virtual democracy in the 1996 and 1998 US elections. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference
Robert Putnam (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Simon & Schuster New York
Benjamin Radcliff (1994.) ArticleTitleTurnout and the Democratic vote American Politics Quarterly 22 259–76
J.D. Sargan (1958.) ArticleTitleThe estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables Econometrica 26 393–415
Dhavan Shah Jack Mcleod So-Hyang Yoon (2001) ArticleTitleCommunication, context, and community Communication Research 28 464–506
Solop, Frederic (2000). Digital democracy comes of age in Arizona. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference
Barbara Tabachnick Linda Fidell (1996) Using Multivariate Statistics EditionNumber3 HarperCollins New York
P.J. Tichenor G.A. Donohue C.N. Olien (1965) ArticleTitleMass media flow and differential growth in knowledge Public Opinion Quarterly 34 159–170
Caroline Tolbert Ramona McNeal (2003) ArticleTitleUnraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly 56 175–185
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary (2003). CLARIFY: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results
Lynn Vavreck Constantine Spiliotes Linda Fowler (2002) ArticleTitleThe effects of retail politics in the New Hampshire primary American Journal of Political Science 46 595–611
Sidney Verba Kay Lehman Schlozman Henry E. Brady (1995) Voice and Equality Harvard University Press Cambridge
Lori Weber Alysha Loumakis James Bergman (2003) ArticleTitleWho participates and why?: an analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public Social Science Computer Review 21 26–42
Gary Wolf (2004) ArticleTitleWeapons of mass mobilization Wired 12.09 1–8
Raymond Wolfinger Steven Rosenstone (1980) Who Votes? Yale University Press New Haven
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Best, S.J., Krueger, B.S. Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Polit Behav 27, 183–216 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y