Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transitions in welfare participation and female headship

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses data from the 1990, 1992, 1993 and 1996 panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation to examine how welfare policies and local economic conditions contribute to women's transitions into and out of female headship and into and out of welfare participation. It also examines whether welfare participation is directly associated with longer spells of headship. The study employs a simultaneous hazards approach that accounts for unobserved heterogeneity in all of its transition models and for the endogeneity of welfare participation in its headship model. The estimation results indicate that welfare participation significantly reduces the chances of leaving female headship. The estimates also reveal that more generous welfare benefits do not directly contribute to headship but rather contribute indirectly to headship by increasing the chances that a mother will enter welfare and consequently remain a single mother for longer. More generous Earned Income Tax Credit benefits are associated with more stable arrangements for both headship and welfare participation. Other measures of welfare policies, including indicators for the adoption of welfare waivers and the implementation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families programs, are generally not significantly associated with headship or welfare receipt. Better economic opportunities are estimated to increase headship but reduce welfare participation among unmarried mothers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, G. (1995), Do welfare benefits promote out-of-wedlock childbearing? in: I. Sawhill (ed.), Welfare reform: An analysis of the issues. Washington DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P.R. (1993), Children's adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support, Journal of Marriage and the Family 55: 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P.R., Loomis, L.S. & Booth A. (1995), Parental divorce, marital conflict, and offspring well-being during early adulthood, Social Forces 73: 895–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1981), A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitler, M.P., Gelbach, J.B. & Hoynes, H.W. (2002), The impact of welfare reform on living arrangements. Working Paper No. w8784, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitler, M.P., Gelbach, J.B., Hoynes, H.W. & Zavodny, M. (2004), The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce, Demography 41: 213–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M. (1999), Analyzing the length of welfare spells, Journal of Public Economics 39: 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M. (2002). Evaluating welfare reform in the United States, Journal of Economic Literature 40: 1105–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M. & Ruggles, P. (1996), When do women use aid to families with dependent children and foodstamps? The dynamics of eligibility versus participation, Journal of Human Resources 31: 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L.L. & Raley, R.K. (1995), Redefining single-parent families: Cohabitation and changing family reality, Demography 32: 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J.S. & Moffitt, R.A. (1982), A computationally efficient quadrature procedure for the one-factor multinomial probit model, Econometrica 50: 761–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives. (various years). Green book: Background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Crouse, G. (1999), State Implementation of Major Changes to Welfare Policies, 1992– 1998, US Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Available from <http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/Waiver-Policies99/policy_CEA.htm>.

  • Deleire, T. & Kalil, A. (2002), Good things come in threes: Single-parent multigenerational family structure and adolescent adjustment, Demography 39: 393–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickert-Conlin, S. & Houser, S. (1999), EITC, AFDC, and the female headship decision. Discussion Paper no. 1192–99. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J. & Hoffman, S.D. (1990), Welfare benefits, economic opportunities, and out-of-wedlock births among black teenage girls, Demography 27: 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J.M. (1995). Local labor markets and local area effects on welfare duration, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 4: 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J.M. & Ribar, D.C. (2004), The impact of welfare reform on female headship decisions, Demography 41: 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, K.N., Fishman, M.E., Nikolov, P. & Laud, S. (2002), State policies to promote marriage. Report submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Falls Church, VA: The Lewin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L.A. & Knox, V. (2003), Staying single: The effects of welfare reform policies on marriage and cohabitation. The Next Generation Working Paper Series no.13. New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennetian, L.A. & Knox, V. (2004). Getting and staying married: The effects of a Minnesota welfare reform program on marital stability, Population Research and Policy Review 23(5–6): 565–591 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman, M. (2001), Declining caseloads: What do the dynamics of welfare participation reveal, Industrial Relations 40: 537–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J. (2003), The effects of time limits and other policy changes on welfare use, work and income among female-headed families, Review of Economics and Statistics 85: 394–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J., Karoly, L. & Klerman, J.A. (2001), Consequences of welfare reform: A research synthesis. Draft Tech. Report No. DREU-2676-DHHS. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harknett, K. & Gennetian, L.A. (2003), The effect of an earnings supplement on union formation, Demography 40: 451–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C., Camasso, M.J, & Jagannathan, R. (2000), Evaluating welfare reform waivers Under Section 1115, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R. & Wolfe, B. (1994), Succeeding generations: On the effects of investments in children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S.L. & Anderson, K.G. (2003), Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment, Journal of Marriage and the Family 65: 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S.D. & Duncan, G.J. (1995), The effect of incomes, wages, and AFDC benefits on marital disruption, Journal of Human Resources 30: 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath-Rose, A. & Peters, H.E. (2001), Welfare waivers and non-marital childbearing, pp. 222–244, in: G. Duncan & L.C. Lansdale (eds.), Welfare reform: For better, for worse. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoynes, H.W. (1997a), Does welfare play any role in female headship decisions? Journal of Public Economics 65: 89–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoynes, H.W. (1997b), Work, welfare, and family structure: What have we learned? pp. 101–146, in: A.J. Auerbach (ed.), Fiscal policy: Lessons from economic research, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekielek, S.M. (1998), Parental conflict, marital disruption and children's emotional well-being, Social Forces 76: 905–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M.P. & Wolpin, K.I. (2002). Estimating welfare effects consistent with forward looking behavior, Part II: Empirical results, Journal of Human Resources 37: 600–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerman, J. & Haider, S. (forthcoming), A stock-flow analysis of the welfare caseload. Journal of Human Resources.

  • Knox, V.A., Miller, C. & Gennetian, L.A. (2000), Reforming welfare and rewarding work: A summary of the final report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program. New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. (1996), The impact of the changing US family structure on child poverty and income inequality, Economica 63: S119–S139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, L. (1993), Simultaneous equations for hazards: Marriage duration and fertility timing, Journal of Econometrics 56: 189–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S., Ribar, D.C. & Wilhelm, M.O. (1997), The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates, Family Planning Perspectives 29: 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S.S. & Sandefur, G. (1994), Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D. & Rosenbaum, D.T. (2001), Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the labor supply of single mothers, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 1063–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R.A. (1995), The effect of the welfare system on non-marital childbearing, in: Report to Congress on out-of-wedlock childbearing. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R.A. (1998), The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility, in: R.A. Moffitt (ed.), Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R.A. (2001), Welfare benefits and female headship in U.S. time series. Discussion Paper no. 1219–01. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R.A. (2002), The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program. Working paper No. w8749. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R.A. & Rendall, M.S. (1995), Cohort trends in the lifetime distribution of female family headship in the United States, 1968–1985, Demography 32: 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D.R. & Coiro, M.J. (1999), Parental conflict and marital disruption: Do children benefit when high-conflict marriages are dissolved? Journal of Marriage and the Family 61: 626–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (1984), Losing ground. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H.E., Plotnick, R.D. & Jeong, S. (2003), How will welfare reform affect childbearing and family structure decisions? in: R.A. Gordon & H.J. Walberg (eds.), Changing welfare. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribar, D. C. (1998) Economic Opportunities and young women's premarital child bearing. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribar, D.C. (2003), County-level estimates of the employment prospects of low-skill workers, pp 227–268, in: S.W. Polachek (ed.), Worker well-being and public policy, research in labor economics, Vol. 22. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribar, D.C. (2004), Transitions from welfare and the employment prospects of low-skill women. Unpublished Manuscript. Washington, DC: George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosensweig, M.R. (1999), Welfare, marital prospects, and nonmarital childbearing, Journal of Political Economy 107: S3–S32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeni, R.F. & Blank, R.M. (2000), What has welfare reform accomplished? Impacts on welfare participation, employment, and family structure. Working paper no. w7627. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitler, J. O., Reichman, N. E., Garfinkel, I. & Nepomnyaschy, L. (2003) TANF Participation and Marriage. Unpublished Manuscript. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (1997), Setting the baseline: A report on state welfare waivers, Available from <http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/isp/waiver2/title.htm>.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003), Indicators of welfare dependence: Annual report to Congress, 2003, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Bowdoin College, 9700 College Station, Brunswick, Maine, 04011-8497, USA

    John M. Fitzgerald & David C. Ribar

Authors
  1. John M. Fitzgerald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David C. Ribar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fitzgerald, J.M., Ribar, D.C. Transitions in welfare participation and female headship. Population Research and Policy Review 23, 641–670 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-004-3463-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-004-3463-5

Search

Navigation