Abstract
This paper contributes to the emerging literature analysing public transit fare card data for a better understanding of passengers’ mobility patterns and path choices. A new heuristic is proposed to estimate the stop-level origins and destinations by detecting the traveller activities in the observed transactions in a fare card dataset. The main focus in this research is estimating the actual passenger trajectories for multi-leg journeys. If the fare card dataset includes both boarding and alighting information of each transaction, the main challenge is the estimation of origins and destinations by distinguishing the transfer interchanges from the activity locations. Built on commonly used criteria for identifying transfers, this paper proposes a new method to improve the accuracy of short activity detection to estimate the passengers’ true origins and destinations. The set of criteria in this research is based on the proposed concept of “off-optimality” for a more accurate identification of short/hidden activities within the labelled transfers. The measure of off-optimality incorporates different variables of the transit service between the given journey ends (including alternative paths and routes, service headways, walk distances/times, transfer points, etc.) and reflects those into a simple quantity to improve the accuracy of estimation. In addition to off-optimality, the time gap between two transactions, the total travel time, and the circuity of the path trajectories are other variables that are used in distinguishing the true transfers from activities. The proposed set of criteria is calibrated using a large endogenous set of fare card data from Brisbane, Australia, and is validated using a set of transit journeys and reported activities from a household travel survey. The results are presented for the fare card data from Brisbane collected in March 2013. The validation and case study results affirm the effectiveness of the proposed criteria in short activity detection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
By “transaction”, we mean the farecard record associated with one trip leg. With “tap-on” systems, a single event (usually the passenger boarding) is recorded; with “tap-on” and “tap-off” systems, both the boarding and alighting of the passenger are recorded. A “transaction” in this paper refers to this record.
The term “stop” in this paper is reserved for bus stops, train stations, and ferry terminals.
References
Barry, J., Freimer, R., Slavin, H.: Use of entry-only automatic fare collection data to estimate linked transit trips in New York City. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 2112, 53–61 (2009)
Barry, J.J., Newhouser, R., Rahbee, A., Sayeda, S.: Origin and destination estimation in New York City with automated fare system data. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 1817, 183–187 (2002)
Chu, K., Chapleau, R.: Enriching archived smart card transaction data for transit demand modeling. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 2063, 63–72 (2008)
Devillaine, F., Munizaga, M., Trépanier, M.: Detection of activities of public transport users by analyzing smart card data. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 2276, 48–55 (2012)
Farzin, J.M.: Constructing an automated bus origin-destination matrix using farecard and global positioning system data in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 2072, 30–37 (2008)
Google Developers (2012). General transit feed specification Reference. Retrieved 1 Sept, 2013, from https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference
Gordon, J., Koutsopoulos, H., Wilson, N., Attanucci, J.: Automated inference of linked transit journeys in London using fare-transaction and vehicle location data. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 2343, 17–24 (2013)
Kurauchi, F., Schmöcker, J.-D., Shimamoto, H., Hassan, S.: Variability of commuters’ bus line choice: an analysis of Oyster card data. Public Transp. 6(1–2), 21–34 (2014)
Kusakabe, T., Iryo, T., Asakura, Y.: Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behavior with smart card transaction data. J. Transp. 37(5), 731–749 (2010)
Lee, S., Hickman, M.: Trip purpose inference using automated fare collection data. Public Transp. 6(1–2), 1–20 (2014)
Lee, S., Hickman, M., Tong, D.: Development of a temporal and spatial linkage between transit demand and land-use patterns. J. Transp. Land Use 6(2), 33–46 (2013)
Lee, S., and M. Hickman (2011). Travel pattern analysis using smart card data of regular users. Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
Ma, X.-L., Wang, Y.-H., Chen, F., Liu, J.-F.: Transit smart card data mining for passenger origin information extraction. J. Zhejiang University Sci. C 13(10), 750–760 (2012)
Munizaga, M., Devillaine, F., Navarrete, C., Silva, D.: Validating travel behavior estimated from smartcard data. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 44, 70–79 (2014)
Munizaga, M.A., Palma, C.: Estimation of a disaggregate multimoda public transport origin–destination matrix from passive smartcard data from Santiago, Chile. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 24, 9–18 (2012)
Nassir, N., Khani, A., Lee, S., Noh, H., Hickman, M.: Transit stop-level origin-destination estimation through use of transit schedule and automated data collection system. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board 2263, 140–150 (2011)
Pelletier, M.-P., Trépanier, M., Morency, C.: Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 19(4), 557–568 (2011)
Rahbee, A.B.: Farecard passenger flow model at Chicago Transit Authority, Illinois. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2072, 3–9 (2008)
Schmöcker, J.-D., Shimamoto, H., Kurauchi, F.: Generation and calibration of transit hyperpaths. Procedia—Social Behav. Sci. 80, 211–230 (2013)
Seaborn, C., Attanucci, J., Wilson, N.H.M.: Analyzing multimodal public transport journeys in London with smart card fare payment data. Transp. Res. Record 2121, 55–62 (2009)
Trépanier, M., Tranchant, N., Chapleau, R.: Individual trip destination estimation in a transit smart card automated fare collection system. J. Intel. Transp. Syst. 11(1), 1–14 (2007)
Wang, W., Attanucci, J.P., Wilson, N.H.M.: Bus passenger origin-destination estimation and related analyses using automated data collection systems. J. Public Transp. 14(4), 131–150 (2011)
Zhao, J., Rahbee, A., Wilson, N.: Estimating a rail passenger trip origin-destination matrix using automatic data collection systems. Computer-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 22(5), 376–387 (2007)
Zhu, Y. (2014). Passenger-to-train assignment model based on automated data. Masters Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR), under the ASTRA agreement. The authors would like to thank TMR for the financial support, and also Tanslink for providing the data and invaluable consultations. The authors also wish to thank the valuable comments from two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nassir, N., Hickman, M. & Ma, ZL. Activity detection and transfer identification for public transit fare card data. Transportation 42, 683–705 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9601-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9601-6