Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in Recall and Appraisal of Anti-Smoking Advertising Among American Youth: National Survey Results, 1997–2001

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public health efforts to reduce the harms related to tobacco use currently include a significant emphasis on anti-smoking media campaigns. This paper provides (a) data on the overall extent of exposure to anti-smoking media among American youth from 1997 to 2001, (b) an appraisal of general youth reactions to such advertising, and (c) an examination of how exposure levels and reactions vary by socio-demographic characteristics. Data were obtained from the Monitoring the Future study, an ongoing nationwide study of youth. Data were collected each year from nationally representative separate and nonoverlapping school samples of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students (N = 29,724; 24,639; and 12,138, respectively). Self-reported levels of recalled exposure to both electronic and print anti-smoking advertising were measured, as well as the judged impact and perceived exaggeration of such advertising. Data indicate that significant increases in overall exposure to anti-smoking advertising occurred over the study time period. These increases were associated with (a) increases in the self-reported likelihood that anti-smoking advertising diminished the probability of individual smoking behaviors, and (b) increases in the perceived level to which anti-smoking advertising exaggerates the risks associated with smoking. Further, these trends were significantly associated with various characteristics—most notably, ethnicity, smoking behaviors, and residence in a state with an ongoing tobacco-control program having a media component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. G., Bachman, L. D., Johnston, & O’Malley, P. M. (2001).Themonitoring the future project after 27 years: Design andprocedures. (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 54). AnnArbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, U., Johnson, T., Pallentino, J., Hopkins, R., McDaniel, W., & R. G., Brooks (1999). Tobacco use among middle and high school students—Florida, 1998 and 1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48, 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, U., T. M., Johnson, R. S., Hopkins, & R. G., Brooks (2000). Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 723–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. E., Bauman, LaPrelle, J., J. D., Brown, G. G., Koch, & C. A., Padgett (1991). The influence of three mass media campaigns on variables related to adolescent cigarette smoking: Results of a field experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 81(5), 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biener, L. (2002). Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: What teenagers think. Tobacco Control, 11(Suppl II), ii43–ii46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biener, L., & T. M., Taylor (2002). The continuing importance of emotion in tobacco control media campaigns: A response to Hastings and MacFadyen. Tobacco Control, 11, 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biener, L., McCallum-Keeler, G., & A. L., Nyman (2000). Adults’ response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: Impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics. Tobacco Control, 9, 401–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A., D. V., Ary, Smolkowski, K., Duncan, T., & Black, C. (2000). A randomized controlled trial of a community intervention to prevent adolescent tobacco use. Tobacco Control, 9, 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. J., Briton, T. W., Clark, Krakow, M., Soldz, S., A. K., Baker, & Posner, J. (1997). Adolescent tobacco use in Massachusetts:Trends among public school students, 1984–1996. Boston, MA:Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. C., Farrelly, C. G., Healton, K. C., Davis, Messeri, P., J. C., Hersey, & M. L., Haviland (2002). Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. American Journal of Public Health, 92(6), 901–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. R., Flay, B. R., Brannon, C. A., Johnson, W. B., Hansen, A. L., Ulene, D. A., Whitneysaltiel, L. R., Gleason, Sussman, S., M. D., Gavin, K. M., Glowacz, D. F., Sobol, & Spiegel,D. C. (1988). The television, school and family smoking prevention and cessation project. 1. Theoretical basis and program development. Preventive Medicine, 17, 585–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. R., Flay, T. Q., Miller, Hedeker, D., Siddiqui, O., C. F., Britton, B. R., Brannon, C. A., Johnson, W. B., Hansen, Sussman, S., & Dent, C. (1995). The television, school, and family smoking prevention and cessation project. VII. Student outcomes and mediating variables. Preventive Medicine, 24, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. S., Flynn, J. K., Worden, Secker-Walker, R. H., Badger,G. J., B. M., Geller, & M. C., Costanza (1992). Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. American Journal of Public Health, 82(6), 827–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. S., Flynn, J. K., Worden, Secker-Walker, R. H., P. L., Pirie, Badger, G. J., J. H., Carpenter, & B. M., Geller (1994). Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention: Effects 2 years after completion. American Journal of Public Health, 84(7), 1148–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafstad, A., L. E., Aaro, Engeland, A., Andersen, A., Langmark, F., & Stray-Pedersen, B. (1997). Provocative appeals in anti-smoking mass media campaigns targeting adolescents—The accumulated effect of multiple exposures. Health Education Research, 12(2), 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E., Harris, G. N., Connolly, Brooks, D., & Davis, B. (1996). Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an anti-smoking campaign—Massachusetts, 1990–1996. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 45, 996–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D., Chapman, S., & Donovan, R. (1998). The return of scare tactics. Tobacco Control, 7, 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, T., H. Y., Sung, & T. E., Keeler (1995). Reducing cigarette consumption in California: Tobacco taxes vs. an anti-smoking media campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 85(9), 1218–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A., Johnson, M. A., Pentz, & M. D., Weber (1990). Relativeeffectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuseprevention with high-risk and low-risk adolescents. Journal ofConsulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. D., Johnston, O’Malley, P. M., & J. G., Bachman (2002). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2001. Volume 1: Secondary school students (NIH PublicationNo. 02-5106). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. N., Lee, & M. F., Callcott (1994). Billboard advertising: Acomparison of vice products across ethnic groups. Journal ofBusiness Research, 30, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewit, E., Coate, D., & Grossman, M. (1981). The effects of government regulation on teenage smoking. Journal of Law and Economics, 24, 545–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A., Logan, & D. R., Longo (1999). Rethinking anti-smoking media campaigns: Two generations of research and issues for the next. Journal of Health Care Finance, 25(4), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M., Mayberry, & P. A., Price (1993). Targeting blacks incigarette billboard advertising: Results from down South. HealthValues: The Journal of Health Behavior, Education & Promotion, 17(1), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, J., Gutierrez, K., & McCall, K. (2000). Strategies for an effective youth counter-marketing program: Recommendations from commercial marketing experts. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 6(3), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. N., Mudde, & De Vries, H. (1999). The reach and effectiveness of a national mass media-led smoking cessation campaign in the Netherlands. American Journal of Public Health, 89(3), 346–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M., Murray, C. L., Perry, Griffin, G., K. C., Harty, Jacobs,D. R., Schmid, L., Daly, K., & Pallonen, U. (1992). Results from a statewide approach to adolescent tobacco use prevention. Preventive Medicine, 21, 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. M., Murray, A. V., Prokhorov, & K. C., Harty (1994). Effects of a statewide antismoking campaign on mass media messages and smoking beliefs. Preventive Medicine, 23, 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Department of Human Services. (2003). Make Oregonhealthier: Saving lives and saving dollars. Tobacco prevention andeducation in Oregon. Program report 2001–2003. Salem, OR: Departmentof Human Services.

  • Pechmann, C. (1997). Does antismoking advertising combat underagesmoking? A review of past practices and research. In M. E. Goldberg,M. Fishbein, S. Middlestadt (Eds.), Social marketing:Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 189–216). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.

  • Pechmann, C., & Reibling, E.T. (2000). Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: Case studies from USA and Canada. Tobacco Control, 9(Suppl II), ii0–ii13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., M. E., Goldberg, & Reibling,E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking ads for adolescents? Theuse of protection motivation theory to identify effective messagethemes. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A., Pentz, J. H., Dwyer, & D. P., MacKinnon (1989a). Amulticommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drugabuse. Journal of the American Medical Association, 261, 3259–3266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A., Pentz, D. P., MacKinnon, J. H., Dwyer, Wang, E. Y. I., W. B., Hansen, B. R., Flay, & C. A., Johnson (1989b). Longitudinal effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project on regular and experimental smoking in adolescents. Preventive Medicine, 18, 304–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. L., Perry, S. H., Kelder, D. M., Murray, & K. I., Klepp (1992). Communitywide smoking prevention: Long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study. American Journal of Public Health, 82(9), 1210–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P., Pierce, W. S., Choi, E. A., Gilpin, A. J., Farkas, & Merritt,R. K. (1996). Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychology, 15, 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. P., Pierce, Emery, S., & Gilpin, E. (2002). The California tobacco control program: A long-term health communication project. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change(pp. 97–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. J., Popham, L. D., Potter, M. A., Hetrick, Muthén, L. K., J. M., Duerr, & M. D., Johnson (1994). Effectiveness of the California 1990–1991 tobacco education media campaign. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(6), 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. E., Raghunathan, P. W., Solenberger, & van Hoewyk, J. (2002). IVEware: Imputation and variance estimation software. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Methodology Program, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L., Klein, B., & Murphy, K. (1981). Government regulation of cigarette health information. Journal of Law and Economics, 24, 575–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M., & Biener, L. (2000). The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal youth study. American Journal of Public Health, 90(3), 380–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M., & Biener, L. (2002). The impact of antismoking mediacampaigns on progression to established smoking: Results of alongitudinal youth study in Massachusetts. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 115–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .

    Google Scholar 

  • Sly, D., G. R., Heald, & Ray S. (2001a). The Florida “Truth” anti-tobacco media evaluation: Design, first year results and implications for planning future media evaluations. Tobacco Control, 10, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. F., Sly, R. S., Hopkins, Trapido, E., & Ray, S. (2001b). Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: The Florida “truth” campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. F., Sly, Trapido, E., & Ray, S. (2002). Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Preventive Medicine, 35, 511–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. H., Smith, & M. A., Stutts (1999). Factors that influence adolescents to smoke. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33(2), 321–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry-McElrath, Y., Wakefield, M., Ruel, E., G. I., Balch, Emery, S.,Szczypka, G., Clegg-Smith, K., & Flay, B. (in press). The effect ofanti-smoking advertisement characteristics on youth appraisal andengagement. Journal of HealthCommunication.

  • Wakefield, M., Durrant, R., Terry-McElrath, Y., Ruel, E., Balch, G., Anderson, S., Hastings, G., Szczypka, G., & Flay, B. (2003a). Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: A comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain. Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl 11), ii82–ii86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, M., Flay, B., Nichter, M., & Giovino, G. (2003b). Effects of anti-smoking advertising on youth smoking: A review. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, M., Flay, B., Nichter, M., & Giovino, G. (2003c). Role of the media in influencing trajectories of youth smoking. Addiction, 98(Suppl 1), 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. E., Warner (1977). The effects of the anti-smoking campaign on cigarette consumption. American Journal of Public Health, 67(7), 645–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. E., Warner (1979). Clearing the airwaves: The cigarette ad ban revisited. Policy Analysis, 5, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A., Winkelby, S. P., Fortmann, & Rockhill, B. (1993). Cigarette smoking trends in adolescents and young adults: The Stanford Five City Project. Preventive Medicine, 22, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lloyd D. Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston, L.D., Terry-McElrath, Y.M., O’Malley, P.M. et al. Trends in Recall and Appraisal of Anti-Smoking Advertising Among American Youth: National Survey Results, 1997–2001. Prev Sci 6, 1–19 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-1249-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-1249-6

Navigation