Abstract
This study assessed the moderating effects of attitudinal ambivalence on adolescent marijuana use in the context of the theory of planned behavior (TPB). With data from the National Survey of Parents and Youth (N = 1,604), two hierarchical multiple regression models were developed to examine the association of ambivalent attitudes, intentions, and later marijuana use. The first model explored the moderating effect of ambivalence on intentions to use marijuana; the second tested the moderation of ambivalence on actual marijuana use 1 year later. Results across both analyses suggest that ambivalence moderated the association of friend norms and subsequent adolescent marijuana use: friend norms were better predictors of marijuana intentions (β = 0.151, t = 2.29, p = 0.02) and subsequent use when adolescents were attitudinally ambivalent about marijuana use (β = 0.071, t = 2.76, p = 0.006). These results suggest that preventive programs that affect the certainty with which adolescents holds pro- or antimarijuana attitudes may influence the likelihood of their resistance to, initiation, or continuance of marijuana use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Cote, N. G. (2008). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 289–311). New York: Psychology.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.
Armitage, C. J., & Arden, M. A. (2007). Felt and potential ambivalence across the stages of change. Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 149–158. doi:10.1177/1359105307071749.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421–1432.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2004). The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude–intention–behavior relations. In G. Haddock & G. R. Maio (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (pp. 121–143). Hove: Psychology Press.
Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: the case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637–653.
Blanton, H., & Burkley, M. (2008). Deviance regulation theory: Applications to adolescent social influence. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 94–121). New York: Guilford.
Blanton, H., & Christie, C. (2003). Deviance regulation: A theory of action and identity. Review of General Psychology, 7, 115–149. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.115.
Block, R. I., & Ghoneim, M. M. (1993). Effects of chronic marijuana use in human cognition. Psychopharmachology, 110, 219–228.
Boyer, C. B., Tschann, J. M., & Shafer, M.-A. (1999). Predictors of risk for sexually transmitted diseases in ninth grade urban high school students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 448–465.
Brook, J. S., Adams, R. E., Balka, E. B., & Johnson, E. (2002). Early adolescent marijuana use: Risks for the transition to young adulthood. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences, 32, 79–91.
Brown, J. S., & Farber, I. E. (1951). Emotions conceptualized as intervening variables—with suggestions toward a theory of frustration. Psychological Bulletin, 48, 465–495.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (2008). Attitude ambivalence. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 261–288). New York: Psychology Press.
Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 37–70.
Conner, M., Povey, R., Sparks, P., & James, R. (2003). Moderating role of attitude ambivalence within the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 75–94.
Converse, P. E. (1995). Foreword. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. xi–xvii). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Cooke, R., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Moderation of cognition–intention and cognition–behaviour relations: A meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 159–186. doi:10.1348/0144666041501688.
Cottrell, J. (2007). Social networks in youth and adolescence (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Crano, W. D. (2010). Experiments as reforms: Persuasion in the nation’s service. In J. P. Forgas, J. Cooper, & W. D. Crano (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 231–248). New York: Psychology Press.
Crano, W. D. (2012). The rules of influence. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.
Crano, W. D., Gilbert, C., Alvaro, E. M., & Siegel, J. T. (2008). Enhancing prediction of inhalant abuse risk in samples of early adolescents: A secondary analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 895–905. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.02.006.
Crano, W. D., Siegel, J. T., Alvaro, E. M., Lac, A., & Hemovich, V. (2008). The at-risk marijuana nonuser: Expanding the standard distinction. Prevention Science, 9, 129–137.
Crano, W. D., Siegel, J. T., & Alvaro, E. A. (2013). The siren’s call: Mass media and drug prevention. In J. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The persuasion handbook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
David, S., Hornik, R., & Maklan, D. (2010). National Survey of Parents and Youth (NSPY), 1998–2004—restricted use files [computer file]. ICPSR27868-v1. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2010-06-17. doi:10.3886/ICPSR27868.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1995). Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 413–432). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Erceg-Hurn, D. M. (2008). Drugs, money, and graphic ads: A critical review of the Montana Meth Project. Prevention Science, 9, 256–263. doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0098-5.
Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1978). Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude–behavior relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 398–408. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90035-5.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Fishbein, M., Cappella, J., Hornik, R., Sayeed, S., Yzer, M., & Ahern, R. K. (2002). The role of theory in developing effective antidrug public service announcements. In W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 89–117). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Gavin, L. A., & Furman, W. (1989). Age differences in adolescents’ perceptions of their peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 25, 827–834.
Hartup, W. W. (2005). Peer interaction: what causes what? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 387–394.
Hass, R. G., Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J., & Moore, L. (1992). When racial ambivalence evokes negative affect, using a disguised measure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 786–797.
Hornik, R., Jacobsohn, L., Orwin, R., Piesse, A., & Kalton, G. (2008). Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 2229–2236. doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.125849.
Johnston, K. L., & White, K. M. (2003). Binge-drinking: A test of the role of group norms in the theory of planned behavior. Psychology and Health, 17, 63–77.
Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2010). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2009 (NIH publication no. 10–7583). Bethesda: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence–indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361–372.
Keyes, K. M., Schulenberg, J. E., O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., Li, G., et al. (2011). The social norms of birth cohorts and adolescent marijuana use in the United States, 1976–2007. Addiction, 106, 1790–1800.
Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Lac, A., & Crano, W. D. (2009). Monitoring matters: Meta-analytic review reveals the reliable linkage of parental monitoring with adolescent marijuana use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 578–586.
Lac, A., Alvaro, E. M., Crano, W. D., & Siegel, J. T. (2009). Pathways from parental knowledge and warmth to adolescent marijuana use: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Prevention Science, 10, 22–32.
Liebkind, K. (1982). The Swedish-speaking Finns: A case study of ethnolinguistic identity. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lundqvist, T. (2005). Cognitive consequences of cannabis use: Comparison with abuse of stimulants and heroin with regard to attention, memory and executive functions. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 81, 319–330.
Lynskey, M., & Hall, W. (2000). The effects of adolescent cannabis use on educational attainment: A review. Addiction, 95, 1621–1630.
Lynskey, M. T., Heath, A. C., Bucholz, K. K., Slutske, W. S., Madden, P. A., & Martin, N. G. (2003). Escalation of drug use in early-onset cannabis users vs co-twin controls. Journal of American Medical Association, 289, 427–33.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). New York: Random House.
Moore, M. (1973). Ambivalence in attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 481–483.
Moore, M. (1980). Validation of attitude toward any practice scale through use of ambivalence as a moderator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 205–208.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2006). InfoFacts on adolescent drug trends. New York: NIH.
Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., & Zanna, M. P. (2008). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? In R. H. Fazio & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Attitudes: Their structure, function, and consequences (pp. 199–213). New York: Psychology Press.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
Palmonari, A., Pombeni, M. L., & Kirchler, E. (1989). Peer groups and evolution of the self-system in adolescence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 3–15. doi:10.1007/BF03172757.
Palmonari, A., Pombeni, M. L., & Kirchler, E. (1990). Adolescents and their peer groups: A study on the significance of peers, social categorization processes and coping with developmental tasks. Social Behaviour, 5, 33–48.
Penning, M., & Barnes, G. E. (1982). Adolescent marijuana use: A review. The International Journal of Addictions, 17, 749–791.
Petraitis, J., Flay, B. R., & Miller, T. Q. (1995). Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: Organizing pieces of the puzzle. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 67–86.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press.
Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Priester, J. R. (2002). Sex, drugs, and attitude ambivalence: How feelings of evaluative tension influence alcohol use and safe sex behaviors. In W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 145–162). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431–449.
Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitude ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 19–34.
Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2001). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 22, 218–233.
Siegel, J. T., Alvaro, E. M., Patel, N., & Crano, W. D. (2009). '…you would probably want to do it. Cause that's what made them popular': Exploring perceptions of inhalant utility among young adolescent nonusers and occasional users. Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 597–615. doi:10.1080/10826080902809543.
Skenderian, J. J., Siegel, J. T., Crano, W. D., Alvaro, E. M., & Lac, A. (2008). Expectancy change and adolescents' intentions to use marijuana. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 563–569.
Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior—assessing the role of identification with green consumerism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 388–399.
Sparks, P., Conner, M., James, R., Shepherd, R., & Povey, R. (2001). Ambivalence about health related behaviors: An exploration in the domain of food choice. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 53–68.
Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tarrant, M. (2002). Adolescent peer groups and social identity. Social Development, 11, 110–123.
Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitude) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Ullrich, J., & Krueger, J. I. (2010). Interpersonal liking from bivariate attitude similarity. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 214–221.
Ullrich, J., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Böttcher, B. (2008). The moderator effect that wasn't there: Statistical problems in ambivalence research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 774–794. doi:10.1037/a0012709.
Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.
Zanna, M. P., Olson, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Attitude–behavior consistency: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 432–440. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.3.432.
Zhao, X., Sayeed, S., Cappella, J., Hornik, R., Fishbein, M., & Ahern, R. K. (2006). Targeting norm-related beliefs about marijuana use in an adolescent population. Health Communication, 19, 187–196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this research was supported by a grant from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA030490). The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hohman, Z.P., Crano, W.D., Siegel, J.T. et al. Attitude Ambivalence, Friend Norms, and Adolescent Drug Use. Prev Sci 15, 65–74 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0368-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0368-8