Skip to main content
Log in

Policy, pedagogy, and priorities: Exploring stakeholder perspectives on active learning in the Maldives

  • Open File
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Challenges of implementing active-learning reform have been reported across a range of countries and include the need for greater attention to contextual factors and practical realities in the reform process. This study investigates how teachers enact active-learning pedagogy within the Maldives. Using design-based research, it explores—through contextual analysis and pedagogical intervention—the conditions under which active learning can be enacted within the Child Friendly Schools framework. The article presents findings of the contextual-analysis phase, which sought to understand stakeholder priorities in order to inform the intervention phase. The World Café, a participatory approach to data collection, reveals the salient features of active learning considered important across the stakeholder groups: the active participation of students, the use of group work, the teacher as facilitator, a friendly classroom environment, and the potential of the reform to be tailored more equally to all students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akyeampong, K., Pryor, J., & Ampiah, J. G. (2006). A vision of successful schooling: Ghanaian teachers’ understandings of learning, teaching and assessment. Comparative Education, 42(2), 155–176. doi:10.1080/03050060600627936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. J. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altinyelken, H. K. (2011). Student-centred pedagogy in Turkey: Conceptualisations, interpretations and practices. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 137–160. doi:10.1080/02680939.2010.504886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchus, M. K. (2008). The education challenges facing small nation states in the increasingly competitive global economy of the twenty-first century. Comparative Education, 44(2), 127–145. doi:10.1080/03050060802040953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547–570. doi:10.1177/1468794109343625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, K., & Leu, E. (2006). Perceptions of Ethiopian teachers and principals on quality of education. Issue paper. Addis Ababa: American Institutes for Research, and Academy for Educational Development.

  • Brock, C., & Crossley, M. (2013). Revisiting scale, comparative research and education in small states. Comparative Education, 49(3), 388–403. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.803782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, K., Lelliott, A., & Davis, H. (2002). Forms and substance in learner-centred teaching: Teachers’ take-up from an in-service programme in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 541–559. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00015-X.

  • Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2008). Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(2), 195–205. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M. (2010). Context matters in educational research and international development: Learning from the small states’ experience. Prospects, 40(4), 421–429. doi:10.1007/s11125-010-9172-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, W. K., & Williams, J. H. (2008). Policy-making for education reform in developing countries: Policy options and strategies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Sablonnière, R., Taylor, D. M., & Sadykova, N. (2009). Challenges of applying a student-centered approach to learning in the context of education in Kyrgyzstan. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(6), 628–634. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembélé, M., & Lefoka, P. (2007). Pedagogical renewal for quality universal primary education: Overview of trends in sub-Saharan Africa. International Review of Education, 53(5/6), 531–553. doi:10.1007/s11159-007-9066-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Biase, R. (2010). The role of textbooks in active learning reform. Learning and Teaching: An International Journal in Classroom Pedagogy, 3(1), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. (2008). Community education in developing countries: The quiet revolution in schooling. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 369–390). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, M. (2010). Improving educational quality through active-learning pedagogies: A comparison of five case studies. Educational Research, 1(3), 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., & Resnick, L. B. (1989). Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Kantamara, P. (2001). Exploring the cultural context of school improvement in Thailand. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(4), 385–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, F., Abd-Kadir, J., & Smith, F. (2008). Pedagogical renewal: Improving the quality of classroom interaction in Nigerian primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(1), 55–69. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, F., Ackers, J., Abrishamian, N., & O’Sullivan, M. (2011). Developing a systemic approach to teacher education in sub-Saharan Africa: Emerging lessons from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Compare, 41(5), 669–683. doi:10.1080/03057925.2011.581014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpaz, Y. (2005). Teaching and learning in a community of thinking. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 20(2), 136–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (2002). The Aga Khan Foundation school improvement initiative: An international change perspective. In S. E. Anderson (Ed.), Improving schools through teacher development: Case studies of the Aga Khan Foundation projects in East Africa (pp. 271–296). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Hodges, M., & Monk, M. (2000). Teacher development and change in South Africa: A critique of the appropriateness of transfer of northern/western practice. Compare, 30(2), 179–192. doi:10.1080/713657456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, E., & Price-Rom, A. (2006). Quality of education and teacher learning: A review of the literature. USAID Educational Quality Improvement Project 1. Washington, DC: USAID.

  • McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, S. (2009). Child friendly schools perception study. Male: UNICEF, Maldives Country Office.

  • Mohamed, N. (2006). An exploratory study of the interplay between teachers’ beliefs, instructional practices and professional development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Auckland, New Zealand.

  • Mohammed, R. F., & Harlech-Jones, B. (2008). The fault is in ourselves: Looking at ‘failures in implementation’. Compare, 38(1), 39–51. doi:10.1080/03057920701420825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazeer, A. (2006). Teaching economics at secondary school level in the Maldives: A cooperative learning model. Waikato: University of Waikato Press.

  • O’Sullivan, M. (2004). The reconceptualisation of learner-centred approaches: A Namibian case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 585–602. doi:10.1016/s0738-0593(03)00018-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamphilon, B. (2006). Changes that matter: A participatory approach to monitoring and evaluation in the Pacific. Paper presented at the Australian Evaluation Society Conference, 4–7 September, Darwin.

  • Rogan, J. M. (2007). How much curriculum change is appropriate? Defining a zone of feasible innovation. Science Education, 91(3), 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2002). Democracy and teacher education: Negotiating practice in the Gambia. Comparative Education, 38(3), 303–314. doi:10.1080/0305006022000014160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 425–432. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2012). Learner-centred education and teacher progressionalism at the local-global nexus. In T. Seddon & J. Levin (Eds.), Educators, professionalism and politics: Global transitions, national spaces, and professional projects. World Yearbook in Education (pp. 172–183). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2013a). Learner-centred education in international perspective. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2013b). Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shareef, A. (2007). The implementation of the Child Friendly Schools Program in the Maldives. Unpublished master's thesis. University of East Anglia, UK.

  • Sottie, C., Dubus, N., & Sossou, M. A. (2013). Enhancing student outcomes through mentoring, peer counselling and parental involvement. Prospects, 43(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2010). Educational policy trajectories in an era of globalization: Singapore and Cambodia. Prospects, 40(4), 465–480. doi:10.1007/s11125-010-9170-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USAID [United States Agency for International Development] (2005). Education strategy: Improving lives through learning. Washington DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavrus, F., & Bartlett, L. (2012). Comparative pedagogies and epistemological diversity: Social and materials contexts of teaching in Tanzania. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 634–658. doi:10.1086/667395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, J., Durrani, N., Brown, R., Orr, D., Pryor, J., Boddy, J., & Salvi, F. (2013). Education rigorous literature review: Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries. Sussex: Department for International Development, University of Sussex. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/305154/Pedagogy-curriculum-teaching-practices-education.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhonda Di Biase.

Additional information

I am indebted to the school community on “my island” for welcoming me into their school to conduct this research. I also thank the Maldives National University, Ahmed Ali Manik, Ameena Mohammed Didi, and Azra Abdul Raheem for guidance and support during my fieldwork. Finally, I thank Sally Godinho and the reviewers for their feedback and comments on this article.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Biase, R. Policy, pedagogy, and priorities: Exploring stakeholder perspectives on active learning in the Maldives. Prospects 45, 213–229 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9346-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9346-1

Keywords

Navigation