Skip to main content
Log in

From network ties to network structures: Exponential Random Graph Models of interorganizational relations

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical accounts of network ties between organizations emphasize the interdependence of individual intentions, opportunities, and actions embedded in local configurations of network ties. These accounts are at odds with empirical models based on assumptions of independence between network ties. As a result, the relation between models for network ties and the observed network structure of interorganizational fields is problematic. Using original fieldwork and data that we have collected on collaborative network ties within a regional community of hospital organizations we estimate newly developed specifications of Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) that help to narrow the gap between theories and empirical models of interorganizational networks. After controlling for the main factors known to affect partner selection decisions, full models in which local dependencies between network ties are appropriately specified outperform restricted models in which such dependencies are left unspecified and only controlled for statistically. We use computational methods to show that networks based on empirical estimates produced by models accounting for local network dependencies reproduce with accuracy salient features of the global network structure that was actually observed. We show that models based on assumptions of independence between network ties do not. The results of the study suggest that mechanisms behind the formation of network ties between organizations are local, but their specification and identification depends on an accurate characterization of network structure. We discuss the implications of this view for current research on interorganizational networks, communities, and fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja G., Polidoro F. Jr, Mitchell W.: Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 30, 941–958 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., Soda, G., Zaheer, A.: The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. (2011) (forthcoming).

  • Baum J.A.C., Singh J.V.: Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. Am. J. Sociol. 100, 346–380 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum J.A.C., Shipilov A.V., Rowley T.J.: Where do small worlds come from?. Ind. Corp. Change 12, 697–725 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum J.A.C, Cowan R., Jonard N.: Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks. Manag. Sci. 56, 2094–2110 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearman P.: Generalized exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 102, 1383–1415 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman C.M., Haunschild P.R., Phillips D.J.: Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15, 259–275 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorman S.A., White H.C.: Social structure from multiple networks. II. Role Structures. Am. J. Sociol. 81, 1384–1446 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass D.J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H.R., Tsai W.: Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 47, 795–817 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton T., Deijfen M., Martin-Löf A.: Generating simple random graphs with prescribed degree distribution. J. Stat. Phys. 124, 1377–1397 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper S., Ebers M., Huxham C., Smith Ring P.: The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander, L., McFarland, D.A.: Intellectual tie formation: multiple networks and refunctionality. Working Paper, Stanford University (2009)

  • Davis G.F., Yoo M., Baker W.E.: The small world of the American Corporate Elite, 1982–2001. Strateg. Organ. 8, 43–68 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein J.M.: Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell M.L.: The effects of environmental characteristics on the structure of hospital clusters. Adm. Sci. Q. 25, 485–510 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach M.L.: The Japanese corporate network: a blockmodel analysis. Adm. Sci. Q. 37, 105–139 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodreau S.M.: Advances in Exponential Random Graph (p*) models applied to a large social network. Soc. Netw. 29, 231–248 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve H.R.: Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organ. Stud. 26, 1025–1047 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M.: Where do interorganizational networks come from?. Am. J. Sociol. 104, 1439–1493 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter D.R.: Curved exponential family models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29, 216–230 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter D.R., Handcock M.S.: Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 15, 565–583 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter D.R., Goodreau S., Handcock M.: Goodness of fit of social network models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103, 248–258 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwashyna T.J., Christie J.D., Kahn J.M., David A.: Uncharted paths: hospital networks in critical care. Chest 135, 827–833 (2009a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwashyna T.J., Jason D.C., Moody J., Kahn J.M., Asch D.A.: The structure of critical care transfer networks. Med. Care 47, 787–793 (2009b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B., Walker G.: The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66, 317–335 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson A.: Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Adm. Sci. Q. 37, 76–104 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann P., Marsden P.V.: Microstructural analysis of interorganizational systems. Soc. Netw. 4, 329–348 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega E., Pattson P.E.: Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study. Soc. Netw. 21, 67–90 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee B.Y., McGlone S.M., Song Y., Avery T.R., Eubank S., Chang C.-C., Bailey R.R., Wagener D.K., Burke D.S., Platt R., Huang S.S.: Social network analysis of patient sharing among hospitals in Orange County, California. Am. J. Public Health 4, 707–713 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomi A., Pattison P.: Manufacturing relations: an empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organ. Sci. 17, 313–332 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers M:J., Snijders T.A.B.: A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: a reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Soc. Netw. 29, 489–507 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., Robins, G.: Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks. 2012. Theory, Methods and Applications. New York. Cambridge University Press. (Forthcoming)

  • Macy M.W., Willer R.: From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28, 143–166 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milo R., Shen-Orr S., Itzkovitz S., Kashtan N., Chklovskii D., Alon U.: Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824–827 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuhashi H., Greve H.: A matching theory of alliance formation and compatibility. Acad. Manag. J. 52, 975–995 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M.E.J.: Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167–256 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M.E.J., Park J.: Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Phys. Rev. E 68, 036122 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachucki M.A., Breiger R.L.: Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 205–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison P.: Algebraic Models for Social Networks. Cambridge University Press, New York (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison P., Robins G.: Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociol. Methodol. 32, 301–337 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picardi C., Calatroni L., Bertoni F.: Communities in Italian corporate networks. Physica A 389, 5247–5258 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny J.M.: Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell W.W., Koput K.W., White D.R., Owen-Smith J.: Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 1132–1205 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan K.G., Milward H.B.: A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Adm. Sci. Q. 40, 1–33 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan K.G., Milward H.B.: Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Adm. Rev. 61, 414–423 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan K.G., Fish A., Sydow J.: Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J. Manag. 33, 479–513 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera M.T., Soderstrom S.B., Uzzi B.: Dynamics of dyads in social networks: assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 91–115 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins G., Alexander M.: Small worlds among interlocking directors: network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 10, 69–94 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins G.L., Pattison P., Woolcock J.: Small and other worlds: Global network structures from local processes. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 894–936 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins G.L., Snijders T.A.B., Wang P., Handcock M., Pattison P.: Recent developments in Exponential Random Graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29, 192–215 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins G., Pattison P., Wang P.: Closure, connectivity, and degree distributions: Exponential Random Graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Soc. Netw. 31, 105–117 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruef M., Scott W.R.: A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Adm. Sci. Q. 43, 877–904 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott W.R., Meyer J.W.: The organization of societal sectors. In: Meyer, J.W., Scott, W.R. (eds) Organizational Environments: Rituals and Rationality, pp. 129–153. Sage, Newbury Park (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders T.A.B.: Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. J. Soc. Struct. 3, 1–41 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison P.E., Robins G.L., Handcock M.S.: New specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models. Sociol. Methodol. 36, 99–153 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn M-W.: Distance and cosine measures of niche overlap. Soc. Netw. 23, 141–165 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn M-W.: A relational approach to measuring competition among hospitals. Health Serv. Res. 37, 457–483 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson O., Stuart T.E.: Bringing the context back in: settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investing. Adm. Sci. Q. 53, 266–294 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart T.E.: Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Adm. Sci. Q. 43, 668–698 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart T.E.: The formation of Inter-organizational networks. In: James, R. (eds) The Missing Links: Formation and Decay of Economic Networks, Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart T.E., Yim S.: Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions. J. Financ. Econ. 97, 174–189 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J.D.: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapido D.: Competitive embeddedness and the emergence of interfirm cooperation. Soc. Forces 86, 167–191 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B.: The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61, 674–698 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B., Lancaster R.: Relational embeddedness and learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients. Manag. Sci. 49, 383–399 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vande Bunt G.G., Groenewegen P.: An actor-oriented dynamic network approach: the case of interorganizational network evolution. Organ. Res. Methods 10, 463–482 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S., Pattison P.E.: Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: an introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika 61, 401–425 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S., Robins G.L.: An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. In: Carrington, P.J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, pp. 148–161. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watts D.J., Strogatz SH.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 4, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal J.D., Zajak E.J.: Defections from the inner circle: social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in U.S. corporations. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 161–183 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H.C., Breiger R.L.: Pattern across networks. Society 12, 68–74 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H.C., Boorman S.A., Breiger R.L.: Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am. J. Sociol. 81, 730–780 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Lomi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pallotti, F., Lomi, A. & Mascia, D. From network ties to network structures: Exponential Random Graph Models of interorganizational relations. Qual Quant 47, 1665–1685 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9619-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9619-6

Keywords

Navigation