Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of hallux valgus open and percutaneous surgery on AOFAS scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the comparative effect of open and percutaneous hallux valgus (HV) surgery on patients’ quality of life (QoL) using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale including total score and individual domains (pain, function, and alignment).

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to March 2020 for studies on the effect of HV surgery on patients’ QoL using the AOFAS score. A standardized mean difference score was calculated on the total AOFAS score and on each AOFAS domain (pain, function, and alignment) using Cohen’s d index.

Results

Considering the 53 published studies included, the pooled effect size (ES) estimates for the AOFAS total score were 3.69 (95% CI 3.37–4.01; I2 = 95.5%) for open surgery and 3.40 (95% CI 2.99–3.80, I2 = 88.2%) for percutaneous surgery. The total pooled ES estimate was 3.61 (95% CI 3.35–3.87, I2 = 94.5%). Considering the pain domain, the pooled ES estimates were 2.21 (95% CI 1.98–2.43, I2 = 64%) for open surgery and 2.52 (95% CI 1.83–3.20, I2 = 92.6%) for percutaneous surgery. For the function domain, the pooled ES estimates were 1.37 (95% CI 0.93–1.81, I2 = 91%) for open surgery and 2.28 (95% CI 1.10–3.47, I2 = 96.8%) for percutaneous surgery. Finally, the pooled ES estimates for the alignment domain were 3.99 (95% CI 3.51–4.47, I2 = 85.7%) for open surgery and 2.66 (95% CI 2.23–3.09, I2 = 78.5%) for percutaneous surgery.

Conclusion

Our data support that HV surgery increases the total AOFAS score as well as the AOFAS scores by domain (pain, function, and alignment). Furthermore, our data show that HV surgery increases patients’ QoL, after both open and percutaneous surgery, without differences between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nix, S., Smith, M., & Vicenzino, B. (2010). Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 3(1), 21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Myerson, M. S. (2000). Hallux valgus. Foot and ankle disorders (pp. 213–289). Philadelphia: WB Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nix, S. E., Vicenzino, B. T., Collins, N. J., & Smith, M. D. (2013). Gait parameters associated with hallux valgus: A systematic review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 6(1), 9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Badekas, A., Georgiannos, D., Lampridis, V., & Bisbinas, I. (2013). Proximal opening wedge metatarsal osteotomy for correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity using a locking plate. International Orthopaedics, 37(9), 1765–1770.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Maffulli, N., Oliva, F., Coppola, C., et al. (2005). Minimally invasive hallux valgus correction: A technical note and a feasibility study. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances, 14, 193–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maffulli, N., Longo, U., Marinozzi, A., et al. (2011). Hallux valgus: Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review. British Medical Bulletin, 97, 149–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Easley, M. E., & Trnka, H. J. (2007). Current concepts review: Hallux valgus part II: Operative treatment. Foot & Ankle International, 28(6), 748–758.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Magnan, B., Pezze, L., Rossi, N., et al. (2005). Percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87, 1191–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Del Vecchio, J. J., & Ghioldi, M. E. (2020). Evolution of minimally invasive surgery in hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Clinics, 25(1), 79–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caravelli, S., Mosca, M., Massimi, S., Costa, G. G., Lo Presti, M., Fuiano, M., et al. (2018). Percutaneous treatment of hallux valgus: What’s the evidence? A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 102(2), 111–117.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bia, A., Guerra-Pinto, F., Pereira, B. S., Corte-Real, N., & Oliva, X. M. (2018). Percutaneous osteotomies in hallux valgus: A systematic review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 57(1), 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malagelada, F., Sahirad, C., Dalmau-Pastor, M., Vega, J., Bhumbra, R., Manzanares-Céspedes, M. C., & Laffenêtre, O. (2019). Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: A systematic review of current surgical techniques. International Orthopaedics, 43(3), 625–637.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saro, C., Jensen, I., Lindgren, U., & Fellander-Tsai, L. (2007). Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 731–738.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Menz, H. B., Roddy, E., Thomas, E., & Croft, P. R. (2011). Impact of hallux valgus severity on general and foot-specific health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(3), 396–404.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider, W., & Knahr, K. (2005). Poor agreement between prospective and retrospective assessment of hallux surgery using the AOFAS Hallux Scale. Foot and Ankle International, 26(12), 1062–1066.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nilsdotter, A. K., Cöster, M. E., Bremander, A., & Cöster, M. C. (2019). Patient-reported outcome after hallux valgus surgery - a two year follow up. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 25(4), 478–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klugarova, J., Hood, V., Bath-Hextall, F., Klugar, M., Mareckova, J., & Kelnarova, Z. (2017). Effectiveness of surgery for adults with hallux valgus deformity: A systematic review. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 15(6), 1671–1710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim, T., Beiri, A., Azzabi, M., Best, A. J., Taylor, G. J., & Menon, D. K. (2007). Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 46, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kitaoka, H. B., Alexander, I. J., Adelaar, R. S., Nunley, J. A., Myerson, M. S., & Sanders, M. (1994). Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot and Ankle International, 15, 349–353.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schrier, J. C., Palmen, L. N., Verheyen, C. C., Jansen, J., & Koëter, S. (2015). Patient-reported outcome measures in hallux valgus surgery. A review of literature. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 21(1), 11–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt, K. J., & Hurwit, D. (2013). Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 95(16), e1181–e1189.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barg, A., Harmer, J. R., Presson, A. P., Zhang, C., Lackey, M., & Saltzman, C. L. (2018). Unfavorable outcomes following surgical treatment of hallux valgus deformity: A systematic literature review. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 100(18), 1563–1573.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8, 336–341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Retrieved January 21, 2019 from https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.

  26. Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., et al. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. DerSimonian, R., & Kacker, R. (2007). Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 28(2), 105–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., Chandler, J., Welch, V. A., Higgins, J. P., & Thomas, J. (2019). Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: A new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database System Review, 10, ED000142.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sterne, J. A., Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (2001). Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ, 323, 101–105.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tanner-Smith, E. E., Egger, M., & Higgins, J. (2019). Systematic reviews in health research. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(3), 310–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kıyak, G., & Esemenli, T. (2019). Should we use intermetatarsal angle as primary determinant to define the limits of distal chevron osteotomy? Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 58(5), 880–885.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee, M., Walsh, J., Smith, M. M., Ling, J., Wines, A., & Lam, P. (2017). Hallux valgus correction comparing percutaneous chevron/akin (PECA) and open scarf/akin osteotomies. Foot and Ankle International, 38(8), 838–846.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, K. B., Cho, N. Y., Park, H. W., Seon, J. K., & Lee, S. H. (2015). A comparison of proximal and distal Chevron osteotomy, both with lateral soft-tissue release, for moderate to severe hallux valgus in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral correction. Bone Joint Journal, 97-B(2), 202–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Park, H. W., Lee, K. B., Chung, J. Y., & Kim, M. S. (2013). Comparison of outcomes between proximal and distal chevron osteotomy, both with supplementary lateral soft-tissue release, for severe hallux valgus deformity. Bone Joint Journal, 95-B(4), 510–516.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Radwan, Y. A., & Mansour, A. M. (2012). Percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy versus distal chevron osteotomy for correction of mild-to-moderate hallux valgus deformity. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 132(11), 1539–1546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Saro, C., Andrén, B., Wildemyr, Z., & Felländer-Tsai, L. (2007). Outcome after distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus: A prospective randomized controlled trial of two methods. Foot and Ankle International, 28(7), 778–787.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deenik, A. R., Pilot, P., Brandt, S. E., van Mameren, H., Geesink, R. G., & Draijer, W. F. (2007). Scarf versus chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus: A randomized controlled trial in 96 patients. Foot and Ankle International, 28(5), 537–541.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bertolo, F., Pautasso, A., Cuocolo, C., Invernizzi, D., & Atzori, F. (2020). The Endolog technique for moderate to severe hallux valgus treatment: Clinical and radiographic analysis of 194 patients. Foot and Ankle Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2020.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Holme, T. J., Sivaloganathan, S. S., Patel, B., & Kunasingam, K. (2020). Third-generation minimally invasive chevron akin osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 41(1), 50–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Verdu-Roman, C., Sanz-Reig, J., Martinez-Gimenez, E., Carratala-Munuera, C., Lopez-Pineda, A., Quesada, J. A., et al. (2020). Plantar pressure improvement in moderate hallux valgus with modified chevron osteotomy: Clinical and radiographic outcomes. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 26(2), 205–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liuni, F. M., Berni, L., Fontanarosa, A., Cepparulo, R., Guardoli, A., Pellegrini, A., et al. (2020). Hallux valgus correction with a new percutaneous distal osteotomy: Surgical technique and medium term outcomes. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 26(1), 39–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo, J., Qin, S., Zhang, F., Dong, W., Hou, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The plantarward oblique Chevron osteotomy: An optional method to treat hallux valgus with painful plantar callosities. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 17364.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Xiong, Y., Shen, B., Hao, C., Xiao, K., Wang, J., & Fang, Z. (2019). Transfer of abductor hallucis tendon combined with scarf osteotomy versus single scarf osteotomy in moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity: A comparative retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20(1), 455.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Castioni, D., Fanelli, D., Gasparini, G., Iannò, B., & Galasso, O. (2019). Scarf osteotomy for the treatment of moderate to severe hallux valgus: Analysis of predictors for midterm outcomes and recurrence. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 26, 439–444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. De Las, H.-R., Lledó-Alvarez, A. M., Andrés-Grau, J., Picazo-Marín, F., Moreno-Sánchez, J. F., & Hernández-Torralba, M. (2019). A new minimally extended distal Chevron osteotomy (MEDCO) with percutaneous soft tissue release (PSTR) for treatment of moderate hallux valgus. Foot (Edinburg), 40, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lim, W. S. R., Liow, M. H. L., Rikhraj, I. S., Goh, G. S., & Koo, K. (2019). The effect of gender in hallux valgus surgery. A propensity score matched study. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 25(5), 670–673.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Severyns, M., Carret, P., Brunier-Agot, L., Debandt, M., Odri, G. A., & Rouvillain, J. L. (2019). Reverdin-Isham procedure for mild or moderate hallux valgus: Clinical and radiographic outcomes. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 103(2), 161–166.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Li, C., Lu, L., Zhang, Y., Ai-Xin-Jue-Luo, Q. C., Wang, Z. T., & Wang, J. F. (2019). F-shaped osteotomy combined with basal opening wedge osteotomy for severe hallux valgus. Orthopaedic Surgery, 11(4), 604–612.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Díaz, F. R. (2019). Use of a percutaneous osteotomy with plate fixation in hallux valgus correction. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 25(2), 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chan, C. X., Gan, J. Z., Chong, H. C., Rikhraj Singh, I., Ng, S. Y. C., & Koo, K. (2019). Two year outcomes of minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 25(2), 119–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lai, M. C., Rikhraj, I. S., Woo, Y. L., Yeo, W., Ng, Y. C. S., & Koo, K. (2018). Clinical and radiological outcomes comparing percutaneous chevron- akin osteotomies vs open scarf-akin osteotomies for hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 39(3), 311–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Acar, B., Kose, O., Turan, A., Unal, M., Kati, Y. A., & Guler, F. (2018). Comparison of bioabsorbable magnesium versus titanium screw fixation for modified distal chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus. BioMed Research International, 2018, 5242806.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ceccarelli, F., Carolla, A., Schiavi, P., & Calderazzi, F. (2018). Modified SERI technique in the treatment of hallux valgus combined with arthritis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (Hong Kong)., 26(3), 2309499018802489.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lai, S. W. H., Tang, C. Q. Y., Graetz, A. E. K., & Thevendran, G. (2018). Preoperative mental health score and postoperative outcome after hallux valgus surgery. Foot and Ankle International, 39(12), 1403–1409.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Şaylı, U., Akman, B., Tanrıöver, A., Kaspar, Ç., Güven, M., & Özler, T. (2018). The results of Scarf osteotomy combined with distal soft tissue procedure are mostly satisfactory in surgical management of moderate to severe hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 24(5), 448–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Park, C. H., & Lee, W. C. (2018). Is double metatarsal osteotomy superior to proximal chevron osteotomy in treatment of hallux valgus with increased distal metatarsal articular angle? Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 57(2), 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chan, H. Y., Chen, J. Y., Zainul-Abidin, S., Ying, H., Koo, K., & Rikhraj, I. S. (2017). Minimal clinically important differences for american orthopaedic foot & ankle society score in hallux valgus surgery. Foot and Ankle International, 38(5), 551–557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Romero, E. C., Candel, R. P., Gómez, S. G., Arias, A. A., Ordoño, A. A., González, J. G., & Romero, R. C. (2017). Percutaneous forefoot surgery for treatment of hallux valgus deformity: An intermediate prospective study. Musculoskeletal Surgery, 101(2), 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Crespo Romero, E., Arcas Ordoño, A., Peñuela Candel, R., Gómez, S., Arias, A., Gálvez González, J., & Crespo, R. R. (2017). Percutaneous hallux valgus surgery without distal metatarsal articular angle correction. Foot and Ankle Specialist, 10(6), 502–508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Biz, C., Fosser, M., Dalmau-Pastor, M., Corradin, M., Rodà, M. G., Aldegheri, R., & Ruggieri, P. (2016). Functional and radiographic outcomes of hallux valgus correction by mini-invasive surgery with Reverdin-Isham and Akin percutaneous osteotomies: A longitudinal prospective study with a 48-month follow-up. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11(1), 157.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Lucas y Hernandez, J., Golanó, P., Roshan-Zamir, S., Darcel, V., Chauveaux, D., & Laffenêtre, O. (2016). Treatment of moderate hallux valgus by percutaneous, extra-articular reverse-L Chevron (PERC) osteotomy. Bone Joint Journal, 98-B(3), 365–373.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wagner, E., Ortiz, C., Figueroa, F., Vela, O., Wagner, P., & Gould, J. S. (2015). Role of a limited transarticular release in severe hallux valgus correction. Foot and Ankle International, 36(11), 1322–1329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Giannini, S., Faldini, C., Nanni, M., Di Martino, A., Luciani, D., & Vannini, F. (2013). A minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: Simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI). International Orthopaedics, 37(9), 1805–1813.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Choi, J. H., Zide, J. R., Coleman, S. C., & Brodsky, J. W. (2013). Prospective study of the treatment of adult primary hallux valgus with scarf osteotomy and soft tissue realignment. Foot and Ankle International, 34(5), 684–690.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Faour-Martín, O., Martín-Ferrero, M. A., Valverde García, J. A., Vega-Castrillo, A., & de la Red-Gallego, M. A. (2013). Long-term results of the retrocapital metatarsal percutaneous osteotomy for hallux valgus. International Orthopaedics, 37(9), 1799–1803.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Giannini, S., Cavallo, M., Faldini, C., Luciani, D., & Vannini, F. (2013). The SERI distal metatarsal osteotomy and scarf osteotomy provide similar correction of hallux valgus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471(7), 2305–2311.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Iannò, B., Familiari, F., De Gori, M., Galasso, O., Ranuccio, F., & Gasparini, G. (2013). Midterm results and complications after minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for treatment of hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 34(7), 969–977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Angthong, C., Yoshimura, I., Kanazawa, K., Hagio, T., Ida, T., & Naito, M. (2013). Minimally invasive distal linear metatarsal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus: A preliminary study of clinical outcome and analytical radiographic results via a mapping system. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 133(3), 321–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kalender, A. M., Uslu, M., Bakan, B., Ozkan, F., Erturk, C., Altay, M. A., et al. (2013). Mitchell’s osteotomy with mini-plate and screw fixation for hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 34(2), 238–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Chiang, C. C., Lin, C. F., Tzeng, Y. H., Huang, C. K., Chen, W. M., & Liu, C. L. (2012). Distal linear osteotomy compared to oblique diaphyseal osteotomy in moderate to severe hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 33(6), 479–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bai, L. B., Lee, K. B., Seo, C. Y., Song, E. K., & Yoon, T. R. (2010). Distal chevron osteotomy with distal soft tissue procedure for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle International, 31(8), 683–688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Jawish, R., Assoum, H., & Saliba, E. (2010). Opening wedge osteotomy of the first cuneiform for the treatment of hallux valgus. International Orthopaedics, 34(3), 361–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kerr, H. L., Jackson, R., & Kothari, P. (2010). Scarf-akin osteotomy correction for hallux valgus: Short-term results from a district general hospital. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 49(1), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Choi, W. J., Yoon, H. K., Yoon, H. S., Kim, B. S., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Comparison of the proximal chevron and Ludloff osteotomies for the correction of hallux valgus. Foot and Ankle International, 30(12), 1154–1160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Maffulli, N., Longo, U. G., Oliva, F., Denaro, V., & Coppola, C. (2009). Bosch osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 40(4), 515–524.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Nikolaou, V. S., Korres, D., Xypnitos, F., Lazarettos, J., Lallos, S., Sapkas, G., & Efstathopoulos, N. (2009). Fixation of Mitchell’s osteotomy with bioabsorbable pins for treatment of hallux valgus deformity. International Orthopaedics, 33(3), 701–706.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Dermon, A., Tilkeridis, C., Lyras, D., Tryfonidis, M., Petrou, C., Tzanis, S., et al. (2009). Long-term results of Mitchell’s procedure for hallux valgus deformity: A 5- to 20-year followup in 204 cases. Foot and Ankle International, 30(1), 16–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Lipscombe, S., Molloy, A., Sirikonda, S., & Hennessy, M. S. (2008). Scarf osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus: Midterm clinical outcome. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 47(4), 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Dawson, J., Coffey, J., Doll, H., Lavis, G., Cooke, P., Herron, M., & Jenkinson, C. (2006). A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: Validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. Quality of Life Research, 15(7), 1211–1222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Thordarson, D., Ebramzadeh, E., Moorthy, M., Lee, J., & Rudicel, S. (2005). Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters. Foot and Ankle International, 26(2), 122–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Radl, R., Leithner, A., Zacherl, M., Lackner, U., Egger, J., & Windhager, R. (2004). The influence of personality traits on the subjective outcome of operative hallux valgus correction. International Orthopaedics, 28(5), 303–306.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Perugia, D., Basile, A., Gensini, A., Stopponi, M., & Simeonibus, A. U. (2003). The scarf osteotomy for severe hallux valgus. International Orthopaedics, 27(2), 103–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Bauer, T., de Lavigne, C., Biau, D., De Prado, M., Isham, S., & Laffenétre, O. (2009). Percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: A prospective multicenter study of 189 cases. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 40(4), 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Kaufmann, G., Dammerer, D., Heyenbrock, F., Braito, M., Moertlbauer, L., & Liebensteiner, M. (2019). Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A randomized controlled trial. International Orthopaedics, 43(2), 343–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Baumhauer, J. F., McIntosh, S., & Rechtine, G. (2013). Age and sex differences between patient and physician-derived outcome measures in the foot and ankle. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 95(3), 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Jeuken, R. M., Schotanus, M. G., Kort, N. P., Deenik, A., Jong, B., & Hendrickx, R. P. (2016). Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing scarf to chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus correction. Foot and Ankle International, 37, 687–695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Ma, Q., Liang, X., & Lu, J. (2019). Chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A meta-analysis. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 25(6), 755–760.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Lin, J. S., & Bustillo, J. (2007). Surgical treatment of hallux valgus: A review. Current Opinion in Orthopaedics, 18, 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Thordarson, D. B., Ebramzadeh, E., Rudicel, S. A., & Baxter, A. (2005). Age-adjusted baseline data for women with hallux valgus undergoing corrective surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87(1), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Hernández-Castillejo, L. E., Martínez Vizcaíno, V., Garrido-Miguel, M., Cavero-Redondo, I., Pozuelo-Carrascosa, D. P., & Álvarez-Bueno, C. (2020). Effectiveness of hallux valgus surgery on patient quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthopaedica, 14, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Torkki, M., Malmivaara, A., Seitsalo, S., Hoikka, V., Laippala, P., & Paavolainen, P. (2001). Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 285(19), 2474–2480.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Pinsker, E., & Daniels, T. R. (2011). AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems. Foot and Ankle International, 32(9), 841–842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Hogea, L. M., Hogea, B. G., Nussbaum, L. A., Grigoraş, M. L., Andor, B. C., Levai, C. M., & Bredicean, A. C. (2017). Health-related quality of life in patients with hallux valgus. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, 58(1), 175–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Malviya, A., Makwana, N., & Laing, P. (2007). Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery. Foot and Ankle International, 28, 494–498.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Pena, F., Agel, J., & Coetzee, J. C. (2007). Comparison of the MFA to the AOFAS outcome tool in a population undergoing total ankle replacement. Foot and Ankle International, 28, 788–793.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Milnes, H. L., Kilmartin, T. E., & Dunlop, G. (2010). A pilot study to explore if the age that women undergo hallux valgus surgery influences the post-operative range of motion and level of satisfaction. Foot (Edinburg)., 20(4), 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Tai, C. C., Ridgeway, S., Ramachandran, M., Ng, V. A., Devic, N., & Singh, D. (2008). Patient expectations for hallux valgus surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong), 16, 91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Choi, G. W., Kim, H. J., Kim, T. W., Lee, J. W., Park, S. B., & Kim, J. K. (2015). Sex-related differences in outcomes after hallux valgus surgery. Yonsei Medical Journal, 56, 466.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Fernández, O., Sánchez, J., Maderuelo, J. A., Benito, E., & Ramos, L. R. (2017). Resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico del hallux valgus. Análisis de su influencia sobre la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Rev Pie Tobillo, 31(1), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Bock, P., Kluger, R., Kristen, K. H., Mittlböck, M., Schuh, R., & Trnka, H. J. (2015). The scarf osteotomy with minimally invasive lateral release for treatment of hallux valgus deformity: Intermediate and long-term results. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 97(15), 1238–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Martin, D. P., Engelberg, R., Agel, J., et al. (1996). Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 14, 173–181.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Radford, P. J. (1993). General outcomes measures. In P. Pynsent, J. Fairebank, & A. Carr (Eds.), Outcome measures in orthopaedics (pp. 59–80). London: Butterworth-Heinmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain

    Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Miriam Garrido-Miguel, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez & Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno

  2. Universidad Politécnica y Artística del Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay

    Celia Álvarez-Bueno

  3. School of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain

    Ana Torres-Costoso

  4. Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile

    Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno

Authors
  1. Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Celia Álvarez-Bueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miriam Garrido-Miguel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana Torres-Costoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sara Reina-Gutiérrez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celia Álvarez-Bueno.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Castillejo, L.E., Álvarez-Bueno, C., Garrido-Miguel, M. et al. The effect of hallux valgus open and percutaneous surgery on AOFAS scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 30, 957–966 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02715-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02715-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation