Abstract
Two experiments were conducted investigating the role of visual sequential memory skill in the word recognition efficiency of undergraduate university students. Word recognition was assessed in a lexical decision task using regularly and strangely spelt words, and nonwords that were either standard orthographically legal strings or items made from words with internal transposed letters. Symbol memory was evaluated in a recognition procedure in which sequences of three to five unfamiliar complex symbols were presented, each followed by a subsequent array containing the symbols either in the same order or with an order transposition. In Experiment 1, there was no independent contribution of symbol memory to either word or nonword processing independently of the ability to discriminate the symbols from one another. In Experiment 2, although symbol memory made a significant contribution to word recognition independently of symbol discrimination and letter identification for two conditions—long strangely spelt words and short transposed-letter items, the effects were extremely small. It was concluded that non-verbal visual sequential memory skill does not play a central role in underpinning efficiency of word recognition in experienced adult readers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111.
Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 1065–1086.
Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of capacity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628.
Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F. G., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–11.
Besner, D., & McCann, R. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.
Castles, A., & Nation, K. (2008). Learning to be a good orthographic reader. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 1–7.
Chambers, S. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225–241.
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.
Facoetti, A., Lorusso, M. L., Paganoni, P., Cattaneo, C., Galli, R., & Mascetti, G. G. (2003). The time course of attentional focusing in dyslexic and normally reading children. Brain and Cognition, 53, 181–184.
Facoetti, A., Zorzi, M., Cestnick, L., Lorusso, M. L., Molteni, M., Paganoni, P., et al. (2006). The relationship between visuo-spatial attention and nonword reading in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 841–855.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.
Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2001). Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 673–696.
Friedmann, N., & Rahamin, E. (2007). Developmental letter position dyslexia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 1, 201–236.
Goulandris, N., & Snowling, M. (1991). Visual memory deficits: A plausible cause of developmental dyslexia? Evidence from a single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 127–154.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
Holmes, V. M., Malone, A., & Redenbach, H. (2008). Orthographic processing and visual sequential memory in unexpectedly poor spellers. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 136–156.
Hulme, C. (1988). The implausibility of low-level visual deficits as a cause of children’s reading difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 369–374.
Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., & Kelly, M. (2008). Visual deficits in developmental dyslexia: Relationships between non-linguistic visual tasks and their contribution to components of reading. Dyslexia, 14, 95–115.
Joseph, H. S., Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Word length and landing position effects during reading in children and adults. Vision Research, 49(16), 2078–2086.
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and non-letters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 724–738.
New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45–52.
Olson, I. R., & Jiang, Y. (2004). Visual short-term memory is not improved by training. Memory and Cognition, 32, 1326–1332.
Pammer, K., Lavis, R., Cooper, C., Hansen, P. C., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2005). Symbol-string sensitivity and adult performance in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 94, 278–296.
Pammer, K., Lavis, R., Hansen, P. C., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2004). Symbol-string sensitivity and children’s reading. Brain and Language, 89, 601–610.
Pammer, K., & Vidyasagar, T. R. (2005). Integration of the visual and auditory networks in dyslexia: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 320–331.
Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829–841.
Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691–706.
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Romani, C., Ward, J., & Olson, A. (1999). Developmental surface dysgraphia: What is the underlying cognitive impairment? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 97–128.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.
Silverberg, N., & Buchanon, L. (2005). Verbal mediation and memory for novel figural designs: A dual interference study. Brain and Language, 57, 198–209.
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modelling of elementary psychological processes (pp. 203–205). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vellutino, F. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2005). Developmental dyslexia. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 362–378). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Vidyasagar, T. R. (2005). Attentional gating in primary visual cortex: A physiological basis for dyslexia. Perception, 34, 903–911.
Whitney, C. (2008). Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 824–865.
Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. (2005). Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 274–301.
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due to Susannah Bellows for running participants in Experiment 1 and to Helen Miller and Sabrina Nemorin for running participants in Experiment 2. Gratitude is also extended to Meredith McKague for her support and to Anne Castles and Sachiko Kinoshita for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Set of Gurmukhu symbols used in the symbol memory task
Appendix: Set of Gurmukhu symbols used in the symbol memory task
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holmes, V.M. Adult word recognition and visual sequential memory. Read Writ 25, 23–44 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9245-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9245-z