Abstract
Phonemic and prosodic awareness are both phonological processes that operate at different levels: the former at the level of the individual sound segment and the latter at the suprasegmental level across syllables. Both have been shown to be related to word reading in young readers. In this study we examine how these processes are differentially related to reading monosyllabic and multisyllabic words. Participants were 110 children in grades four and five who were asked to read monosyllabic and three- and four-syllable words matched for frequency. Phonemic awareness was assessed via a phoneme elision task; prosodic awareness was assessed by a task asking participants to identify the syllable bearing primary stress in a spoken word. Results showed that phonemic and prosodic awareness were independent predictors of short word reading, and both phonological factors made independent contributions to multisyllabic word reading, showing that phonemic and prosodic awareness are complementary but not redundant processes. Only prosodic awareness survived control for simple decoding ability in the reading of long words, suggesting that suprasegmental phonology gives added value to our understanding of reading multisyllabic words.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We thank an anonymous reviewer for this point.
References
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Anastasiou, D., & Protopapas, A. (2014). Difficulties in lexical stress versus difficulties in segmental phonology among adolescents with dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(1), 31–50. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.934452.
Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 255–259. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00376.x.
Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Seva, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral, and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 180–196. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.005.
Calet, N., Gutiérrez-Palma, N., Simpson, I. C., González-Trujillo, M. C., & Defior, S. (2015). Suprasegmental phonology development and reading acquisition: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(1), 51–71. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.976342.
Cutler, A. & Mehler, J. (1993). The periodicity bias. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 103–108.
Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
Defior, S., Gutiérrez-Palma, N., & Cano-Marín, M. J. (2012). Prosodic awareness skills and literacy acquisition in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(4), 285–294. doi:10.1007/s10936-011-9192-0.
Del Campo, R., Buchanan, W. R., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2014). Levels of phonology related to reading and writing in middle childhood. Reading and Writing, 28, 183–198. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9520-5.
Demuth, K. (1996). The prosodic structure of early words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 171-184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodman, I., Libenson, A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2010). Sensitivity to linguistic stress, phonological awareness and early reading ability in preschoolers. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 113–127. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01423.x.
Goswami, U. (2015). Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: Three challenges for research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 43–54. doi:10.1038/nrn3836.
Goswami, U., Gerson, D., & Astruc, L. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 995–1019. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9186-6.
Goswami, U., Mead, N., Fosker, T., Huss, M., Barnes, L., & Leong, V. (2013). Impaired perception of syllable stress in children with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.03.001.
Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2012). A cross-sectional study of prosodic sensitivity and reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(1), 32–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01459.x.
Jarmulowicz, L., Hay, S. E., Taran, V. L., & Ethington, C. A. (2008). Fitting derivational morphophonology into a developmental model of reading. Reading and Writing, 21(3), 275–297. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9073-y.
Jarmulowicz, L., Taran, V. L., & Hay, S. E. (2007). Third graders’ metalinguistic skills, reading skills, and stress production in derived English words. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1593–1606. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/107).
Kearns, D. M. (2015). How elementary-age children read polysyllabic polymorphemic words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 364–390. doi:10.1037/a0037518.
Kehoe, M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997). The acquisition of prosodic structure: An investigation of current accounts of children’s prosodic development. Language, 73(1), 113–144. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005772.
Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42(2), 75–82. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00487.x.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. J. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first-grade children. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23086537
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 106–151. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001.
Ševa, N., Monaghan, P., & Arciuli, J. (2009). Stressing what is important: Orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(3), 237–249. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.09.002.
Steedman, M. (1996). The role of prosody and semantics in the acquisition of syntax. In J. Morgan and K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 331–342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wade-Woolley, L. & Heggie, L. (in press). Linguistic stress and reading: More than phonological awareness. In J. Thomson & L. Jarmulowicz (Eds.) Linguistic rhythm and literacy. New York: John Benjamins Publishers.
Wade-Woolley, L., & Heggie, L. (2015). Implicit knowledge of word stress and derivational morphology guides skilled readers’ decoding of multisyllabic words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(1), 21–30. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.947647.
Wade-Woolley, L., & Wood, C. (2006). Editorial: Prosodic sensitivity and reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 253–257. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00306.x.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc.
Wang, M., & Arciuli, J. (2015). Introduction to the special issue. Phonology beyond phonemes: Contributions of suprasegmental information to reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(1), 1–4. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.976790.
Whalley, K., & Hansen, J. (2006). The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 288–303. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00309.x.
Wood, C. P., Wade-Woolley, L., & Holliman, A. J. (2009). Phonological awareness: Beyond phonemes. In C. P. Wood & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge.
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests–revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Long and short word list.
Trance | Ceremony |
Emotion | Pyramid |
Glimpse | Military |
Starch | Scheme |
Misery | Macaroni |
Scroll | Gallery |
Thrill | Cabinet |
Luxury | Charity |
Loyalty | Deposit |
Expedition | Reality |
Janitor | Intelligence |
Poetry | Certificate |
Hypothesis | Stride |
Threat | Apology |
Relaxation | Sleeve |
Interruption | Sketch |
Plunge |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wade-Woolley, L. Prosodic and phonemic awareness in children’s reading of long and short words. Read Writ 29, 371–382 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9600-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9600-1