Abstract
In research universities, research time is often too scarce to satiate the wishes of all faculty and must be allocated according to guidelines and principles. We examine self-reported research hours for full-time faculty at research universities in 13 countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Finland, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Norway, UK, USA, and Hong Kong, a semi-autonomous special administrative region of China). We examine the level of variation in individual faculty research time and the factors associated with individual differences, including differences in: (a) university policy regarding the allocation of working time for research between individual faculty members, (b) individual motivation towards research, and (c) family commitments. Our results suggest that the factors associated with additional research time vary across countries, but individual motivation towards research (relative to teaching) is a significant in all countries. University policies towards research and the research status of individual faculty, are relatively weak predictors of individual research time, though stronger effects are generally found in English-speaking countries. Research hours typically decrease with age, but plateau or increase in the oldest cohorts. Family and gender are weak predictors of research time amongst full-time faculty.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
China for Social Sciences (VIF = 4.46), Natural sciences (VIF = 5.92), and Technology (VIF = 5.31); Malaysia for Social sciences (VIF = 4.64), Natural sciences (VIF = 5.78) and Technology (VIF = 6.65).
References
Balbachevsky, E., & Quinteiro, M. C. (2003). The changing academic workplace in Brazil. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The decline of the guru: The academic profession in developing and middle-income countries (pp. 75–106). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Barry, J., Berg, E., & Chandler, J. (2003). Managing intellectual labour in Sweden and England. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 10(3), 3–22.
Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Bellamy, S., Morley, C., & Watty, K. (2003). Why business academics remain in Australian universities despite deteriorating working conditions and reduced job satisfaction: An intellectual puzzle. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 13–28.
Bellas, M. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22, 367–390.
Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2012). Academic work from a comparative perspective: A survey of faculty working time across 13 countries. Higher Education, 63, 529–547.
Chen, X. (2003). The academic profession in China. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The decline of the guru: The academic profession in developing and middle-income countries (pp. 107–134). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Creamer, E. (1998). Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity. Washington D.C.: ASHE-ERIC/George Washington University.
Elster, J. (1992). Local justice: How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enders, J. (Ed.). (2001). Academic staff in Europe: Changing contexts and conditions. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34(3), 347–372.
Gottlieb, E. E., & Keith, B. (1997). The academic research-teaching nexus in eight advanced-industrialized countries. Higher Education, 34(3), 397–419.
Guest, R., & Duhs, A. (2002). Economics teaching in Australian universities: Rewards and outcomes. Economic Record, 78(241), 147–160.
Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting Organisations and Society, 20, 93–109.
Jaccard, J., Becker, M. A., & Wood, G. (1984). Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 589–596.
Jacobs, J. A. (1998). Measuring time at work: Are self-reports accurate? Monthly Labor Review, 121(12), 42–53.
Jacobs, J. A. (2004). The faculty time divide. Sociological Forum, 19(1), 3–27.
Jacobs, J. A., & Winslow, S. E. (2004a). The academic life course, time pressures and gender inequality. Community, Work & Family, 7(2), 143–161.
Jacobs, J. A., & Winslow, S. E. (2004b). Overworked faculty: Job stresses and family demands. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596(1), 104–129.
Kyvik, S. (2009). Allocating time resources for research between academic staff: The case of Norwegian University Colleges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(3), 109–122.
Kyvik, S. (2012). Academic salaries in Norway: Increasing emphasis on research achievement. In P. G. Altbach, L. Reisberg, M. Yudkevich, L. Reisberg, G. Androushchak, & I. Pacheco (Eds.), Paying the professoriate (pp. 255–264). New York: Routledge.
Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T. B. (2008). Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities? Scientometrics, 76(3), 439–455.
Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(1), 54–71.
Lafferty, G., & Fleming, J. (2000). The restructuring of academic work in Australia: Power, management and gender. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(2), 257–267.
Link, A., Swann, C., & Bozeman, B. (2008). A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 363–374.
Long, J. (1990). The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 68(4), 1297–1316.
Marquis, C. (2003). Universities and professors in Argentina: Changes, challenges. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The Decline of the Guru: The Academic Profession in Developing and Middle-Income Countries (pp. 51–73). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Massy, W. F. (2004). Markets in Higher Education: Do They Promote Internal Efficiency? In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in Higer Education, (Vol. 6, pp. 13–35). the Netherlands: Springer.
Meyer, K. A. (1998). Faculty workload studies: Perspectives, needs, and future directions ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Moscati, R. (2001). Italian University Professors in Transition. Higher Education, 41(1/2), 103–129.
Probert, B. (2005). ‘I just couldn’t fit it in’: Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(1), 50–72.
Robinson, J. P., & Bostrom, A. (1994). The overestimated workweek? What time diary measures suggest. Monthly Labor Review, 111(8), 11–23.
Rosser, V. J., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). An examination of faculty work: Conceptual and theoretical frameworks in the literature. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 449–475). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sax, L., Hagedorn, L., Arredondo, M., & DiCrisi, F. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.
Singell, L., & Lillydahl, J. (1996). Will changing times change the allocation of faculty time? Journal of Human Resources, 31(2), 429–449.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1992). Striking the Mother Lode in science: The importance of age, place, and time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39(2), 201–222.
UNESCO. (1978). Recommendation Concerning the International Standardization of Statistics on Science and Technology. Paris: UNESCO.
White, K. (2001). Women in the professoriate in Australia. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 3(2), 64–76.
White, K. (2004). The leaking pipeline: Women postgraduate and early career researchers in Australia. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(3), 227–241.
Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. R., & Massy, W. F. (2005). The lattice and the ratchet. In R. Zemsky, G. R. Wegner, & W. F. Massy (Eds.), Remaking the American University: Market-smart and mission-centered (pp. 15–31). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bentley, P.J., Kyvik, S. Individual Differences in Faculty Research Time Allocations Across 13 Countries. Res High Educ 54, 329–348 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4