Abstract
The research outlined in this paper investigated how student teachers perceived the development of their knowledge and attitudes towards physics through video recorded practical workshops based on experiments and subsequent group discussions. During an 8-week physics course, 40 primary science student teachers worked in groups of 13–14 on practical experiments and problem-solving skills in physics. The student teachers were video recorded in order to follow their activities and discussions during the experiments. In connection with every workshop, the student teachers participated in a seminar conducted by their physics teachers and a primary science teacher; they watched the video recording in order to reflect on their activities and how they communicated their conceptions in their group. After the 8 weeks of coursework a questionnaire including a storyline was used to elicit the student teachers’ perceptions of their development of subject matter knowledge from the beginning to the end of the course. Finally, five participants were interviewed after the course. The results provided insight into how aspects such as self-confidence and the meaningfulness of knowledge for primary teaching were perceived as important factors for the primary science student teachers’ development of subject matter knowledge as well as a positive attitude towards physics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teachers’ knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwa: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ameh, C., & Gunstone, R. (1985). Teachers’ concepts in science. Research in Science Education, 15, 151–157.
Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers’ confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self-confidence? International Journal of Science Education, 19, 357–369.
Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32, 393–410.
Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25.
Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 31–54). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Beijaard, D., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Evaluation of story-line methodology in research on teachers’ practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 47–62.
Bennett, J., Rollnick, M., Green, G., & White, M. (2001). The development and use of an instrument to assess student’s attitude to the study of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 833–845.
Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1992). On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 407–427). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Calderhead, J. (1988). Knowledge structures in learning to teach. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 51–64). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Carlsson, B. (2002). Variationsteori och naturvetenskapligt lärande. [Variation theory and the learning of science], Research report/Luleå University of Technology, 2002:04. Luleå, Sweden.
Childs, A., & McNicholl, J. (2007). Investigating the relationship between subject content knowledge and pedagogical practice through the analysis of classroom discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1629–1653.
Cochran, K. F., & Jones, L. L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707–718). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Gergen, M. M. (1988). Narrative structures in social explanation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing social explanation (pp. 94–112). London: Sage.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 199–213). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gunstone, R. F., & Northfield, J. (1994). Metacognition and learning to teach. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 523–537.
Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323–337.
Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 93–105.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109–120.
Helldén, G., Lindahl, B. & Redfors, A. (2005). Lärande och undervisning i naturvetenskap — en forskningsöversikt. [Learning and teaching of science — a research overview, Swedish Research Council] Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Henze, F. A. (2006). Science teachers’ knowledge development in the context of educational reform. Leiden: ICLON, Leiden University, The Netherlands. Unpublished PhD thesis.
Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for research in mathematics education, 35, 330–351.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.
Hope, J., & Townsend, M. (1983). Student teachers’ understanding of science concepts. Research in Science Education, 13, 177–183.
Jarrett, O. S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11, 47–57.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2006). The relationship between primary teachers’ attitudes and cognition during a two year science in-service programme. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 157–168). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kind, P. M., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 871–893.
Koch, J. (2006). Relating learning theories to pedagogy for presevice elementary science education. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 91–106). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lederman, N. G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary science teacher education. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917–946.
Loughran, J. J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London: Routledge.
Murphy, C., & Carlisle, K. (2008). Situating relational ontology and transformative activist stance within the ‘everyday’ practice of co-teaching and cogenerative dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 493–506.
Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding — The complex nature of PCK in pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1281–1299.
Nilsson, P. (2009). From lesson plan to new comprehension: Exploring student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning in learning about teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 239–258.
Olson, J., & Appleton, K. (2006). Considering curriculum for elementary science methods courses. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 127–151). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: Past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 26, 99–147.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collin, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.
Palmer, D. H. (2001). Factors contributing to exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science & Education, 86, 122–138.
Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science & Education, 82, 553–568.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Vygotsky, L. (1934/1986). Thoughts and language. London: MIT Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the ‘zone of proximal development’ (pp. 7–18). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Yip, D. Y., Chung, C. M., & Mak, S. Y. (1998). The subject matter knowledge in physics related topiccs of Hong Kong junior secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 319–328.
Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots and saints: Visions for subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 27–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2. Questions posed in the questionnaire
-
1.
Put into words your knowledge development represented in the storyline. Do you have any peaks or valleys, and why? How do you consider your knowledge development at the end of the course compared to when it started? What was easy and what was difficult, and why?
-
2.
How did you perceive the design and the methods of the course?
-
3.
How did you view the four workshops (good, bad, easy, difficult)?
-
4.
What was your attitude to physics before the course, and did this attitude change during the course?
-
5.
What factors during the 8 weeks were most important for your development of subject matter knowledge in physics?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, P., van Driel, J. How Will We Understand What We Teach? - Primary Student Teachers’ Perceptions of their Development of Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Physics. Res Sci Educ 41, 541–560 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9179-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9179-0