Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bad Woman, Bad Victim? Disentangling the Effects of Victim Stereotypicality, Gender Stereotypicality and Benevolent Sexism on Acquaintance Rape Victim Blame

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the assertion that previous research may have inadvertently confounded two stereotypes, we considered the impact of benevolent sexism on rape victim blame in the context of independent manipulations of gender and the perceived genuineness (victim stereotypicality) of an acquaintance rape victim. We predicted that for blame, benevolent sexism may be independently positively associated with gender and victim counter-stereotypicality. Following pilot work, 120 Australian undergraduates read an acquaintance rape scenario. Results indicated that benevolent sexism was only positively associated with blame of the gender counter-stereotypical victim when that victim was also counter-stereotypical in terms of victim stereotypes. This result indicates a more moderate role than previously indicated for benevolent sexism in accounting for rape victim blame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance and stranger rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, I., & Doherty, K. (2008). Accounting for rape: Psychology, feminism and discourse analysis in the study of sexual violence. Women and psychology. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, E. (1991). The context of date rape. In B. Levy (Ed.), Dating violence: Young women in danger (pp. 94–99). Seattle, WA: Seal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9–25). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Stereotype activation and inhibition. Advances in social cognition, 11 (pp. 1–52). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briody, M. (2002). The effects of DNA evidence on sexual offence cases in court. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 14, 159–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buddie, A., & Miller, A. (2001). Beyond rape myths: a more complex view of perceptions of rape victims. Sex Roles, 45, 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B., David, F., & Grant, A. (2001). Sexual violence in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women’s social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DuMont, J., Miller, K., & Myhr, T. (2003). The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individualting processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., Hamm, N. R., & White, K. B. (2003). Perceptions of the woman who breastfeeds: the role of erotophobia, sexism, and attitudinal variables. Sex Roles, 49, 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory; differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Sakilli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & de Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as a simply antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., & Reiger, S. (1991). The female fear: The social cost of rape. Chicago: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., Kings, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1499–1511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, S., & Oreg, S. (2008). Chivalry and the moderating effect of ambivalent sexism: individual differences in crime seriousness judgments. Law and Society Review, 42, 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2000). Masculine and feminine cultures. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, 5 (pp. 115–118). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K., & Turrisi, R. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class and race relations. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. K. (1995). Attributions about date rape: impact of clothing, sex, money spent, date type, and perceived similarity. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23, 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (2001). To believe or not to believe? Police responses to women rape complainants.

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (2002). A research review on the reporting, investigation and prosecution of rape cases. London: Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of Women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed.). Westport: Praeger/Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B. (1991). Social psychological issues in the study of rape. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 279–309). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Sinclair, L. (1999). Motivated reasoning with stereotypes: activation, application, and inhibition. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel constraint satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B. D., & Spencer, S. J. (2002). The dynamic time course for stereotype activation: activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 283–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Jordan, C. (2003). The impact of comprehension goals on the ebb and flow of stereotype activation during interaction. Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium, 9, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K., & Fitzgerald, L. (1994). Rape myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, B. P., & Gross, A. M. (1995). Date rape: an analysis of two contextual variables. Behavior Modification, 19, 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masser, B. M. (1998). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: A social psychological evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Canterbury: University of Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: the consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51, 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya, M., Glick, P., Exposito, F., de Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scronce, C., & Corcoran, K. (1995). The influence of the victim’s consumption of alcohol on perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape. Violence Against Women, 1, 241–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: the system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 56, 743–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., & Spears, J. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. W., Dobbin, S. A., & Gatowski, S. I. (1996). “Real rapes” and “real victims”: the shared reliance on common cultural definitions of rape. Feminist Legal Studies, 4, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vali, D., & Rizzo, N. (1991). Apparel as one factor in sex crimes against young females: professional opinions of U.S. psychiatrists. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T. N., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T. N., Massey, K., & Masser, B. (2005). When chivalry backfires: benevolent sexism and attitudes toward Myra Hindley. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, A. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2006). The effects of a victim’s substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors’ judgments in an acquaintance rape case. Sex Roles, 54, 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Barbara Masser, Kate Lee & Blake M. McKimmie

Authors
  1. Barbara Masser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kate Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Blake M. McKimmie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Masser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masser, B., Lee, K. & McKimmie, B.M. Bad Woman, Bad Victim? Disentangling the Effects of Victim Stereotypicality, Gender Stereotypicality and Benevolent Sexism on Acquaintance Rape Victim Blame. Sex Roles 62, 494–504 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation